Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2009

01-11-2009 | Short Communication

Routine assessment of social difficulties in cancer patients: are we opening Pandora’s box?

Authors: Emma J. Podmore, Laura C. Bingham, Kathryn M. Roberts, Peter J. Selby, Penny Wright, Galina Velikova

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

Living with cancer impacts on the social aspects of the lives of the patient and their families, causing problems that can remain undetected. The Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI) has been shown as an effective screening tool, but concerns exist that detecting more problems may increase the workload for clinic staff and related services. The aim of this analysis is to assess the level of unmet need for social difficulties and to identify any potential increase in required interventions that may occur as a result of detailed assessment.

Patients and methods

A previous cross-sectional interview study was conducted to establish the clinical utility of the SDI. Adult patients were recruited from oncology, haematology and chest medicine clinics. They completed the SDI and a semi-structured interview by a social worker, who was blind to the SDI results. With participant agreement, interventions were made for the detected problems. This paper reports on a secondary descriptive analysis of intervention data, which was performed to examine the details of the interventions and referral patterns.

Main results

No intervention was necessary for 108 (59%) of patients, 42 (23%) received information, 33 (15%) were referred to another service and five (3%) received both information and a referral. Most information was provided about holiday insurance. The majority of referrals were made to Social Work (55% of all referrals) with the main reason being related to benefits or finances.

Conclusions

Increased referral rate was observed following a social work interview, when comparing with local audit data. However, the majority of needs could be met by increasing accessibility of information.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cull A, Stewart M, Altman DG (1995) Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 72:229–235PubMed Cull A, Stewart M, Altman DG (1995) Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 72:229–235PubMed
2.
go back to reference Eakin EG, Strycker LA (2001) Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psychooncology 10:103–113CrossRefPubMed Eakin EG, Strycker LA (2001) Awareness and barriers to use of cancer support and information resources by HMO patients with breast, prostate, or colon cancer: patient and provider perspectives. Psychooncology 10:103–113CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Department of Health (ed) (2007) Cancer reform strategy. Central Office of Information, London. pp 9–10, 22, 70–84 Department of Health (ed) (2007) Cancer reform strategy. Central Office of Information, London. pp 9–10, 22, 70–84
4.
go back to reference Macmillan Cancer Support, University of Southampton (2006) We listen to patients: a Macmillan Cancer Support report - the research priorities of people affected by cancer. University of Southampton, Southampton Macmillan Cancer Support, University of Southampton (2006) We listen to patients: a Macmillan Cancer Support report - the research priorities of people affected by cancer. University of Southampton, Southampton
5.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (ed) (2004) Guidance on cancer services—improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer—the manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London. pp 86–94 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (ed) (2004) Guidance on cancer services—improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer—the manual. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London. pp 86–94
6.
go back to reference Ramirez AJ, Graham J, Richards MA, Cull A, Gregory WM (1996) Mental health of hospital consultants: the effects of stress and satisfaction at work. Lancet 347:724–728CrossRefPubMed Ramirez AJ, Graham J, Richards MA, Cull A, Gregory WM (1996) Mental health of hospital consultants: the effects of stress and satisfaction at work. Lancet 347:724–728CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Taylor C, Graham J, Potts HW, Richards MA, Ramirez AJ (2005) Changes in mental health of UK hospital consultants since the mid-1990s. Lancet 366:742–744CrossRefPubMed Taylor C, Graham J, Potts HW, Richards MA, Ramirez AJ (2005) Changes in mental health of UK hospital consultants since the mid-1990s. Lancet 366:742–744CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thorne SE, Bultz BD, Baile WF (2005) Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care?: a critical review of the literature. Psychooncology 14:875–884 discussion 885-876CrossRefPubMed Thorne SE, Bultz BD, Baile WF (2005) Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care?: a critical review of the literature. Psychooncology 14:875–884 discussion 885-876CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Travado L, Grassi L, Gil F, Ventura C, Martins C (2005) Physician-patient communication among Southern European cancer physicians: the influence of psychosocial orientation and burnout. Psychooncology 14:661–670CrossRefPubMed Travado L, Grassi L, Gil F, Ventura C, Martins C (2005) Physician-patient communication among Southern European cancer physicians: the influence of psychosocial orientation and burnout. Psychooncology 14:661–670CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wright EP, Kiely M, Johnston C, Smith AB, Cull A, Selby PJ (2005) Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Qual Life Res 14:373–386CrossRefPubMed Wright EP, Kiely M, Johnston C, Smith AB, Cull A, Selby PJ (2005) Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Qual Life Res 14:373–386CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wright EP, Kiely MA, Lynch P, Cull A, Selby PJ (2002) Social problems in oncology. Br J Cancer 87:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed Wright EP, Kiely MA, Lynch P, Cull A, Selby PJ (2002) Social problems in oncology. Br J Cancer 87:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wright P, Marshall L, Smith AB, Velikova G, Selby P (2008) Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI). Eur J Cancer 44:1529–1535CrossRefPubMed Wright P, Marshall L, Smith AB, Velikova G, Selby P (2008) Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI). Eur J Cancer 44:1529–1535CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wright P, Smith A, Booth L, Winterbottom A, Kiely M, Velikova G, Selby P (2005) Psychosocial difficulties, deprivation and cancer: three questionnaire studies involving 609 cancer patients. Br J Cancer 93:622–626CrossRefPubMed Wright P, Smith A, Booth L, Winterbottom A, Kiely M, Velikova G, Selby P (2005) Psychosocial difficulties, deprivation and cancer: three questionnaire studies involving 609 cancer patients. Br J Cancer 93:622–626CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wright P, Smith A, Roberts K, Selby P, Velikova G (2007) Screening for social difficulties in cancer patients: clinical utility of the Social Difficulties Inventory. Br J Cancer 97:1063–1070CrossRefPubMed Wright P, Smith A, Roberts K, Selby P, Velikova G (2007) Screening for social difficulties in cancer patients: clinical utility of the Social Difficulties Inventory. Br J Cancer 97:1063–1070CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Routine assessment of social difficulties in cancer patients: are we opening Pandora’s box?
Authors
Emma J. Podmore
Laura C. Bingham
Kathryn M. Roberts
Peter J. Selby
Penny Wright
Galina Velikova
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0690-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine