Top

Supportive Care in Cancer

Published in:

01-04-2010 | Original Article

Ways of talking about illness and prognosis in palliative cancer care consultations—two interactional frames

Authors: Eva Lidén, Joakim Öhlén, Lars-Christer Hydén, Febe Friberg

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2010

Abstract

Goals of work

The purpose of the study was to describe how interaction about changes in illness and prognosis was shaped by participants in outpatient palliative cancer care consultations.

Patients and methods

The data collection involved six video-recorded consultations at an outpatient oncology unit at a university hospital in Sweden. The interactions were studied by means of discourse analysis. Inclusion criteria for the patients were gastro-intestinal cancer and receiving palliative care. The sample included three men and three women, aged 54–70, with various metastasised gastro-intestinal tumours. Significant others (SOs) were included where patients brought one to the consultation. Three male consultants aged 55–59 participated.

Main results

In palliative care consultations, the person-to-person and the patient–professional conversation frames were found to be in use as patients, SOs and physicians talked about the patients’ illness and prognosis. Within the patient–professional frame, three interactional patterns were found: the patient emphasising emotional experiences of illness or well-being and the physicians responding by toning down strategies, patients asking direct questions and getting straight answers and finally interaction marked by cautiousness and avoidances. Within the person–person frame, the interactions were described as: playful talk, collegial talk and existential talk.

Conclusions

When patients shared their personal interpretations of illness and prognosis, their narrative was more enhanced by the person-to-person frame than the patient–professional frame. Finding out if and how patients and SOs want to express their worries and finding a balance between the interactional patterns that occur are ethical challenges which health professionals must face. Since patients and SOs may restrain their emotional experiences, investigating grounded ways of overcoming these difficulties is imperative.

Anderson WG et al (2008) “What concerns me is...” Expression of emotion by advanced cancer patients during outpatient visits. Support Care Cancer 16:803–811. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0350-8 CrossRefPubMed

Baider L (2008) Communicating about illness: a family narrative. Support Care Cancer 16:607–611. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0370-4 CrossRefPubMed

Beach WA et al (2005) Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews. Soc Sci Med 60:893–910. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.031 CrossRefPubMed

Burns C et al (2007) Fluctuating awareness of treatment goals among patients and their caregivers: a longitudinal study of a dynamic process. Support Care Cancer 15(2):187–196. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0116-8 CrossRefPubMed

Butow P et al (2004) Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4401–4409. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.66.155 CrossRefPubMed

Butow PN et al (2002) Oncologists’ reactions to cancer patients’ verbal cues. Psychooncology 11(1):47–58. doi:10.1002/pon.556 CrossRefPubMed

Bülow PH (2004) Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling. Discourse Soc 15(1):33–53. doi:10.1177/0957926504038943 CrossRef

Clayton JM et al (2005) Discussing end-of-life issues with terminally ill cancer patients and their carers: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 13(8):589–599. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0759-2 CrossRefPubMed

Coleman T (2000) Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Pract 17(5):422–427. doi:10.1093/fampra/17.5.422 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Europe, C.o. (2003) Recommendation Rec(2003)24 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the organisation of palliative care and explanatory memorandum.

11.

Frank A (1995) The wounded storyteller. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

12.

Friberg F, Öhlén J (2007) Searching for knowledge and understanding while living with impending death—a phenomenological case study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 2(4):217–226. doi:10.1080/17482620701523777 CrossRef

13.

Halimaa S-L (2001) Video recording as a method of data collection in nursing research. Vard Norden 21:21–26

14.

Hancock K et al (2007) Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review. Palliat Med 21(6):507–517. doi:10.1177/0269216307080823 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hancock K et al (2007) Discrepant perceptions about end-of-life communication: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage 34(2):190–200. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.009 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Jarrett N, Payne SA (2000) Creating and maintaining ‘optimism’ in cancer care communication. Int J Nurs Stud 37:81–90. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(99)00039-5 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lee V (2008) The existential plight of cancer: meaning making as a concrete approach to the intangible search for meaning. Support Care Cancer 16:779–785. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0396-7 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Maguire P, Pitceathley C (2002) Key communication skills and how to acquire them. BMJ 325(7366):697–700. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7366.697 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Makoul G (2001) Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo Consensus Statement. Acad Med 76(4):390–393. doi:10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mattingly C (1998) Healing dramas and clinical plots. The narrative structure of experience. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

21.

Murinson BB, Aakash KA, Haythornthwaite JA (2008) Cognitive expertise, emotional development, and reflective capacity: clinical skills for improved care. J Pain 9(11):975–983. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.07.010 CrossRefPubMed

22.

O’Hair D (2003) Research traditions in provider–consumer interaction: implications for cancer care. Patient Educ Couns 50(1):5–8PubMed

23.

Parker SM et al (2007) A systematic review of prognostic/end-of-life communication with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: patient/caregiver preferences for the content, style, and timing of information. J Pain Symptom Manage 34(1):81–93. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.035 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Polit DF, Beck CT (2004) Nursing research : principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

25.

Potter J (2003) Discursive psychology: between method and paradigm. Discourse Soc 14:783–794. doi:10.1177/09579265030146005 CrossRef

26.

Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage, London

27.

Rapley T et al (2006) Doctor–patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. Soc Sci Med 62(9):2267–2278. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.011 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Roberts C, Sarangi S (2005) Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 39:632–640. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02171.x CrossRefPubMed

29.

Romanoff BD, Thompson BE (2006) Meaning construction in palliative care: the use of narrative, ritual, and the expressive arts. Am J Hosp Palliat Med 23(4):309–316CrossRef

30.

Roter DL et al (2000) Experts practice what they preach. A descriptive study of best and normative practices in end-of-life discussions. Arch Intern Med 160(22):3477–3485. doi:10.1001/archinte.160.22.3477 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Sarangi S, Roberts C (1999) The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In: Sarangi S, Roberts C (eds) Talk, work and institutional order Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 1–57CrossRef

32.

Silverman D (2004) Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction, 2nd edn. Sage, London

33.

Whittemore R, Chase SK, Mandle CL (2001) Validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 11:522–537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Öhlén J et al (2008) Exploration of communicative patterns of consultations in palliative cancer care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12(1):44–52. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2007.07.005 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Ways of talking about illness and prognosis in palliative cancer care consultations—two interactional frames
Authors: Eva Lidén
Joakim Öhlén
Lars-Christer Hydén
Febe Friberg
Publication date: 01-04-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0673-8

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Goals of work

Patients and methods

Main results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Personality predicts perceived availability of social support and satisfaction with social support in women with early stage breast cancer

Quality of life, anxiety, and depression in Turkish colorectal cancer patients

Defunctioning stoma in high ASA grade, aged patients, with bowel occlusion due to advanced cancer: is it still worthwhile?

Validation of the Portuguese version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients

Resident preparedness in discussing prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer

A proposed EGFR inhibitor dermatologic adverse event-specific grading scale from the MASCC skin toxicity study group

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer