Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Supportive Care International

Meeting information needs on cancer-related fatigue: an exploration of views held by Italian patients and nurses

Authors: Michela Piredda, Maria Grazia De Marinis, Laura Rocci, Raffaella Gualandi, Daniela Tartaglini, Emma Ream

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Interest in cancer-related fatigue has been growing over the last two decades and efforts have been dedicated to investigate this topic. However, research addressing the adequacy of educational resources for patients with this distressing and common symptom is lacking. Only one study has been undertaken and this explored Swiss and British patients’ views.

Materials and methods

The current study replicated and extended the study previously undertaken in the United Kingdom (UK) and Switzerland. It sought views on the adequacy of materials on cancer-related fatigue available to patients with cancer living in Italy, and to determine the educational preferences and needs of Italian patients with cancer-related fatigue. These were attained through conduct of two focus groups. One was undertaken with Italian patients and the other with a group of Italian nurses.

Main results

Findings from this study supported patients’ desire for timely, accurate and individualised information. Barriers to effective fatigue education included the limited dialogue regarding fatigue initiated in clinical settings. It appeared that nurses and patients held different priorities in symptom management. Further, it was acknowledged that there was often insufficient time to inform patients adequately about fatigue. Participants considered written materials as helpful complements to oral information, thus supporting the provision of information in both forms. However, it was clear that fewer written resources concerning cancer-related fatigue were available in Italy compared to either in Switzerland or in the UK.

Conclusion

The study supported the view within the current literature that whilst cancer-related fatigue is recognised as a frequent and disruptive symptom, patient education about this symptom and its management still needs to be enhanced. The resources available to educate patients about cancer-related fatigue should be improved and made more accessible to patients who experience it.
Literature
1.
Ahlberg K, Ekman T, Gaston-Johansson F, Mock V (2003) Assessment and management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Lancet 362:640–650PubMedCrossRef
2.
Arthur S, Nazroo J (2003) Designing fieldwork strategies and materials. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London, pp 109–137
3.
Asbury JE (1995) Overview of focus group research. Qual Health Res 5:414–420CrossRef
4.
Barsevick AM, Whitmar K, Walker L (2001) In their own words: using the common sense model to analyse patient descriptions of cancer-related fatigue. Oncol Nurs Forum 28:1363–1369PubMed
5.
Barsevick A, Dudley W, Beck S, Sweeney C, Whitmer K, Nail L (2004) A randomised clinical trial of energy conservation for patients with cancer-related fatigue. Cancer 100:1302–1310PubMedCrossRef
6.
Beaudin CL, Pelletier LR (1996) Consumer-based research: using focus groups as a method for evaluating quality of care. J Nurs Care Qual 10:28–33PubMed
7.
Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford
8.
Carey MA (1995) Comment: concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Health Res 5:487–495CrossRef
9.
Chelf JH, Agre P, Axelrod A, Cheney L, Cole DD, Conrad K, Hooper S, Liu I, Mercurio A, Stepan K, Villejo L, Weaver C (2001) Cancer-related patient education: an overview of the last decade of evaluation and research. Oncol Nurs Forum 28:1139–1147PubMed
10.
Dodd M, Miaskowski C, Lee K (2004) Occurrence of symptom clusters. J Natl Cancer Inst 32:76–78
11.
Ferrell BR, Grant M, Dean G, Funk B, Ly J (1996) Bone tired: the experience of fatigue and its impact on quality of life. Oncol Nurs Forum 23:1539–1547
12.
Finch H, Lewis J (2003) Focus groups. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London, pp 170–198
13.
Foltz AT, Sullivan JM (1999) Limited literacy revisited. Implications for patient education. Cancer Pract 7:145–150PubMedCrossRef
14.
Given C, Given B, Rahbar M, Jeon S, McCorkle R, Cimprich B, Galecki A, Kozachik S, Brady A, Fisher-Malloy MJ, Courtney K, Bowie E (2004) Effect of a cognitive behavioral Intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:507–516PubMedCrossRef
15.
Glaus A (2000) Fatigue in patients with cancer—from an orphan topic to a global concern. Support Care Cancer 9:1–3CrossRef
16.
17.
Glaus A, Crow R, Hammond S (1996) A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Eur J Cancer Care 5:8–23CrossRef
18.
Grant M, Golant M, Rivera L, Dean G, Benjamin H (2000) Developing a community program on cancer pain and fatigue. Cancer Pract 8:187–194PubMedCrossRef
19.
Greenbaum TL (1998) The handbook for focus group research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
20.
Grillo C, Prandi C, Perfetti E, Defilippi V, Clerico M, Porcile G (2003) [Oncology health professionals’ perception regarding the problem of fatigue in cancer in Italy]. Prof Inferm 56:238–244PubMed
21.
Harden J, Schafenacker A, Northouse L, Mood D, Smith D, Pienta K, Hussain M, Baranowski K (2002) Couples’ experiences with prostate cancer: focus group research. Oncol Nurs Forum 29:701–709PubMedCrossRef
22.
Hinds PS, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Gilger E, Kline N, Burleson C, Bottomley S, Quargnenti A (1999) Comparing patient, parent, and staff descriptions of fatigue in pediatric oncology patients. Cancer Nurs 22:277–289PubMedCrossRef
23.
Hilfinger Messias DK, Yeager KA, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ (1997) Patients’ perspectives of fatigue while undergoing chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum 24:43–48
24.
25.
Holley S, Borger D (2001) Energy for living with cancer: preliminary findings of a cancer rehabilitation group intervention study. Oncol Nurs Forum 28:1393–1396PubMed
26.
Kitzinger J, Barbour RS (1999) Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus group. In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J (eds) Developing focus group research politics, theory and practice. Sage, London, pp 1–20
27.
Knowles G, Borthwick D, McNamara S, Miller M, Leggot L (2000) Survey of nurses’ assessment of cancer-related fatigue. Eur J Cancer Care 9:105–113CrossRef
28.
Krueger RA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
29.
Krueger RA (1998) Moderating focus groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
30.
La Verde G, Arienti D (2002) “Fatigue e sintomi correlati in emato-oncologia: la visione dell’ematologo0 e del paziente [Cancer-related fatigue in haematological cancer: haematologist’s and patient’s view]. Recent Prog Med 93:463–469
31.
Macleod Clark J, Maben J, Jones K (1996) The use of focus group interviews in nursing research: issues and challenges. NT Res 1:143–153
32.
Magnusson K, Karlsson EB, Palmblad C, Leitner C, Paulson A (1997) Swedish nurses’ estimation of fatigue as a symptom in cancer patients—report of a questionnaire. Eur J Cancer Care 6:186–191CrossRef
33.
Magnusson K, Moller A, Ekman T, Wallgren A (1999) A qualitative study to explore the experience of fatigue in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care 8:224–232CrossRef
34.
Merton RK, Fiske M, Kendall PL (1990) The focused interview: a manual of problems and procedures, 2nd edn. Free press, New York
35.
Miller M, Kearney N (2001) Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards cancer-related fatigue. Eur J Oncol Nurs 5:208–217PubMedCrossRef
36.
Mings D (1998) Patient education resources: an annotated bibliography of fatigue resources for patients and their families. Can Oncol Nurs J 8(S1):S16PubMed
37.
Morgan DL (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
38.
Morgan DL (1998) Planning and developing focus groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
39.
Moumjid N, Morelle M, Carrère MO, Bachelot T, Mignotte H, Brémond A (2003) Elaborating patient information with patients themselves: lessons from a cancer treatment focus group. Health Expect 6:128–139PubMedCrossRef
40.
National Cancer Alliance (1996) Patient-centred cancer services? What patients say. National Cancer Alliance, Oxford
41.
42.
Parsaie FA, Golchin M, Asvadi I (2000) A comparison of nurse and patient perceptions of chemotherapy treatment stressors. Cancer Nurs 23:371–374PubMedCrossRef
43.
Passik SD, Kirsh KL, Donaghy K, Holtsclaw E, Theobald D, Cella D, Breitbart W (2002) Patient-related barriers to fatigue communication; initial validation of the fatigue management barriers questionnaire. J Pain Symptom Manage 24:481–491PubMedCrossRef
44.
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
45.
Peters DA (1993) Improving quality requires consumer input: using focus groups. J Nurs Care Qual 7:34–41PubMed
46.
Piredda M, Rocci L, Gualandi R (2004) Cancer-related fatigue and its management in patients and healthcare professionals views: a literature review. Int Nurs Perspect 4:103–114
47.
Ream E, Browne N (2001) An exploration of European nurses’ and patients’ views on the resources available for patients to enable them to cope with cancer-related fatigue. In: Report of Action on Fatigue Research Programme to the European Oncology Nursing Society, Brussels, Belgium
48.
Ream E, Browne N, Glaus A, Knipping C, Frei IA (2003) Quality and efficacy of educational materials on cancer-related fatigue: views on of patients from two European countries. Eur J Oncol Nurs 7:99–109PubMedCrossRef
49.
Ream E, Richardson A, Alexander-Dann C (2006) Supportive intervention for fatigue in patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomised clinical trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 31:148–161PubMedCrossRef
50.
Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G (2003) Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative research practice. Sage, London, pp 1–23
51.
Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG (eds) Analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, pp 173–194
52.
Robinson N (1999) The use of focus group methodology—with selected examples from sexual health research. J Adv Nurs 29:905–913PubMedCrossRef
53.
Servaes P, Verhagen C, Bleijenberg G (2002) Fatigue in cancer patients during and after treatment: prevalence, correlates and interventions. Eur J Cancer 38:27–43PubMedCrossRef
54.
Stasi R, Abriani L, Beccaglia P, Terzoli E, Amadori S (2002) [Anemia induced by solid tumor chemotherapy]. Recent Prog Med 93:585–601
55.
Stone P, Ream E, Richardson A, Thomas H, Andrews P, Cambell P, Dawson T, Edwards J, Goldie T, Hammick M, Kearney N, Lean M, Rapley D, Smith AG, Teague C, Young A (2003) Cancer-related fatigue—a difference of opinion? Results of a multicentre survey of healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers. Eur J Cancer Care 12:20–27CrossRef
56.
Sullivan JM, Foltz AT (2000) Focus groups: giving voice to people. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 4:177–182PubMed
57.
Tanghe A, Evers G, Paridaens R (1998) Nurses’ assessments of symptom occurrence and symptom distress in chemotherapy patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2:14–26CrossRef
58.
Tavio M, Milan I, Tirelli U (2002) Astenia correlata al tumore [Tumor-correlated asthenia]. Recent Prog Med 93:610–616
59.
Twinn S (1997) An exploratory study examining the influence of translation on the validity of qualitative data in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 26:418–423PubMedCrossRef
60.
Twinn S (2000) The analysis of focus group data: a challenge to the rigour of qualitative research. NT Res 5:140–146
61.
Vogelzang NJ, Breitbart W, Cella D, Curt GA, Groopman GE, Horning SJ, Itri LM, Johnson DH, Scherr SL, Portenoy RK (1997) Patient, caregiver and oncologist perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The Fatigue Coalition. Semin Hematol 34:4–12PubMed
62.
Wilkinson S (1999) Focus group methodology: a review. Int J Soc Res Methodol 1:181–203
63.
Winningham ML, Nail LM, Burke MB, Brophy L, Cimprich B, Jones LS, Pickard-Holley S, Rhodes V, St Pierre B, Beck S (1994) Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 21:23–36PubMed
Metadata
Title
Meeting information needs on cancer-related fatigue: an exploration of views held by Italian patients and nurses
Authors
Michela Piredda
Maria Grazia De Marinis
Laura Rocci
Raffaella Gualandi
Daniela Tartaglini
Emma Ream
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0240-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2007 Go to the issue

Original Article

Developing supportive care for family members of people with lung cancer: a feasibility study

Original Article

Association of complementary methods with quality of life and life satisfaction in patients with gynecologic and breast malignancies

Short Communication

Intraclass correlation metrics for the accuracy of algorithmic definitions in a computerized decision support system for supportive cancer care

Short Communiation

Adjunct dipyrone in association with oral morphine for cancer-related pain: the sooner the better

Review Article

Measurement of oral mucositis in children: a review of the literature

Erratum

Erratum To: Abstract of the 20th International Anniversary MASCC/ISOO Symposium: A Phase III randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy of low level laser therapy for the prevention of oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits