Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2007

01-09-2007 | Original Article

Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice

Authors: Claire F. Snyder, Sydney M. Dy, Danetta E. Hendricks, Julie R. Brahmer, Michael A. Carducci, Antonio C. Wolff, Albert W. Wu

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

Questionnaires used in oncology practice for individual patient management need to address issues patients find important and want help with and issues cancer center health professionals can address. We investigated the item content from two health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires and two needs assessments for this purpose.

Patients and methods

In this preliminary study, 61 cancer patients and 19 cancer center health professionals rated the item content from the EORTC-QLQ-C30, FACT-G, Supportive Care Needs Survey-34 (SCNS), and Kingston Needs Assessment–Cancer. Patients rated each item’s importance and whether they wanted help with it; health professionals rated each item’s importance and whether they felt able to help patients address it. Patients and health professionals also reported their overall questionnaire preference.

Main results

Patients rated information about treatments (options, benefits, side effects) and care coordination as the most important issues and those for which they most wanted help from their health professionals. Health professionals rated pain and other symptom/side effect items as most important to patients and those for which they were most able to help. Findings were consistent across tumor type and treatment status. Patients had an overall preference for the SCNS. Health professionals had no clear questionnaire preference.

Conclusions

This preliminary study suggests that the issues patients most want help with may not be the issues that health professionals feel most able to address. If these findings are confirmed in more representative samples, interventions may be needed to assist health professionals in managing cancer patients’ HRQOL issues and needs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd (edn). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 179–189 Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd (edn). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 179–189
2.
go back to reference Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A, Supportive Care Review Group (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225PubMedCrossRef Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A, Supportive Care Review Group (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients’ experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 7:513–519PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, Davies AR, Jette AM, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Young RT, Brook RH, Delbanco TL (1994) Functional disability screening of ambulatory patients: a randomized controlled trial in a hospital-based practice group. J Gen Intern Med 9:590–592PubMedCrossRef Calkins DR, Rubenstein LV, Cleary PD, Davies AR, Jette AM, Fink A, Kosecoff J, Young RT, Brook RH, Delbanco TL (1994) Functional disability screening of ambulatory patients: a randomized controlled trial in a hospital-based practice group. J Gen Intern Med 9:590–592PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P (2001) Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46–52PubMed Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P (2001) Computerized quality-of-life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46–52PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cella DF, Bonomi AE (1996) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) Quality of life measurement system. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd (edn). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 203–214 Cella DF, Bonomi AE (1996) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) Quality of life measurement system. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd (edn). Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 203–214
7.
go back to reference Davidson JR, Findlay L, Zetes-Zanatta L, Ram SS, Brundage MD, Smith A (2003) Assessing the supportive care needs of patients who attend a cancer centre: development and feasibility of a questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2:814 Davidson JR, Findlay L, Zetes-Zanatta L, Ram SS, Brundage MD, Smith A (2003) Assessing the supportive care needs of patients who attend a cancer centre: development and feasibility of a questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2:814
8.
go back to reference Detmar SB, Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 20:1056–1062PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 20:1056–1062PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communications. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gill TM, Feinstein AR (1994) A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA 272:619–626PubMedCrossRef Gill TM, Feinstein AR (1994) A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA 272:619–626PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greenhalgh J, Meadows K (1999) The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 5:401–416PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh J, Meadows K (1999) The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 5:401–416PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gustafson D (2005) Needs assessment in cancer. In: Lipsomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds) Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–328 Gustafson D (2005) Needs assessment in cancer. In: Lipsomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds) Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–328
14.
go back to reference Haywood K, Marshall S, Fitzpatrick R (2006) Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns 63:12–23PubMedCrossRef Haywood K, Marshall S, Fitzpatrick R (2006) Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns 63:12–23PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacobsen PB, Davis K, Cella D (2002) Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology 16:133–139PubMed Jacobsen PB, Davis K, Cella D (2002) Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practice. Oncology 16:133–139PubMed
16.
go back to reference Larsson G, Widmark-Petersson V, Lampic C, von Essen L, Sjoden P-O (1998) Cancer patient and staff ratings of the importance of caring behaviours and their relations to patient anxiety and depression. J Adv Nurs 27:855–864PubMedCrossRef Larsson G, Widmark-Petersson V, Lampic C, von Essen L, Sjoden P-O (1998) Cancer patient and staff ratings of the importance of caring behaviours and their relations to patient anxiety and depression. J Adv Nurs 27:855–864PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McLachlan S-A, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M, Beresford J, Zalcberg J (2001) Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:4117–4125PubMed McLachlan S-A, Allenby A, Matthews J, Wirth A, Kissane D, Bishop M, Beresford J, Zalcberg J (2001) Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessment versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:4117–4125PubMed
20.
go back to reference Morris J, Perez D, McNoe B (1998) The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 7:85–91PubMedCrossRef Morris J, Perez D, McNoe B (1998) The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 7:85–91PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK, Dorman PJ (1997) Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients’ and doctors’ perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 314:1580–1583PubMed Rothwell PM, McDowell Z, Wong CK, Dorman PJ (1997) Doctors and patients don’t agree: cross sectional study of patients’ and doctors’ perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 314:1580–1583PubMed
22.
go back to reference Rubenstein LV, McCoy JM, Cope DW, Barrett PA, Hirsch SH, Messer KS, Young RT (1995) Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. J Gen Intern Med 10:607–614PubMedCrossRef Rubenstein LV, McCoy JM, Cope DW, Barrett PA, Hirsch SH, Messer KS, Young RT (1995) Improving patient quality of life with feedback to physicians about functional status. J Gen Intern Med 10:607–614PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P, Supportive Care Review Group (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–237PubMedCrossRef Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P, Supportive Care Review Group (2000) The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–237PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Skeel RT (1993) Quality of life dimensions that are most important to cancer patients. Oncology 7:55–60PubMed Skeel RT (1993) Quality of life dimensions that are most important to cancer patients. Oncology 7:55–60PubMed
25.
go back to reference Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-Oncology 9:203–213PubMedCrossRef Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-Oncology 9:203–213PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby PJ (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby PJ (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17:998–1007PubMed
27.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB, Stark D, Perren T, Brown J, Selby P (2001) Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB, Stark D, Perren T, Brown J, Selby P (2001) Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed
28.
go back to reference Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, Selby PJ (2002) Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor–patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51–59PubMedCrossRef Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, Selby PJ (2002) Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor–patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51–59PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714–724PubMedCrossRef Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714–724PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Widmark-Petersson V, von Essen L, Sjoden P-O (2000) Perceptions of caring among patients with cancer and their staff: differences and disagreements. Cancer Nurs 23:32–39PubMedCrossRef Widmark-Petersson V, von Essen L, Sjoden P-O (2000) Perceptions of caring among patients with cancer and their staff: differences and disagreements. Cancer Nurs 23:32–39PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikova G, Watson K, Gould A, Cull A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382PubMedCrossRef Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikova G, Watson K, Gould A, Cull A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yount S, Davis K, Khan S, Bass M, Eton D, Masters G, Cella D (2003) Real-time symptom monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer. Qual Life Res 12:725 Yount S, Davis K, Khan S, Bass M, Eton D, Masters G, Cella D (2003) Real-time symptom monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer. Qual Life Res 12:725
Metadata
Title
Asking the right questions: investigating needs assessments and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires for use in oncology clinical practice
Authors
Claire F. Snyder
Sydney M. Dy
Danetta E. Hendricks
Julie R. Brahmer
Michael A. Carducci
Antonio C. Wolff
Albert W. Wu
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0223-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine