Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2007

01-10-2007 | Review Article

Patients’ needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools

Authors: Alison Richardson, Jibby Medina, Vivienne Brown, John Sitzia

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The assessment of patients’ needs for care is a critical step in achieving patient-centred cancer care. Tools can be used to assess needs and inform care planning. This review discusses the importance of systematic assessment of needs in routine care and the contribution tools can make to this process.

Method

A rapid appraisal was undertaken to identify currently available tools for patient assessment in cancer care through searches conducted with Medline and CINHAL databases. It focused on tools for the systematic assessment of individual patients’ needs for help, care or support, to be used for clinical purposes—not for research or other purposes. Tools that focused on a single domain of care such as psychosocial needs were excluded, as were studies of patient satisfaction. A wide list of search terms was used, with references stored and managed using bibliographic software.

Results

In all, 1,803 papers were identified from the initial search, with 91 papers found to be relevant; although 36 tools were identified, only 15 tools were found to fit our criteria. These were appraised for their validity, reliability, responsiveness to change and feasibility, including acceptability to patients. The process of their development and psychometric properties were reasonably well documented, but data on how feasible they were to use in practice was scarce. Each tool met some but not all the widely accepted criteria for validity, reliability, responsiveness and burden. None were found to be complete for all dimensions of needs assessment. Most have not been sufficiently well tested for use in routine care.

Conclusion

There is a need to continue to develop and test tools that have the attributes necessary for effective practice and to research their effects on the quality of supportive cancer care.
Literature
1.
Wen K-Y, Gustafson DH (2004) Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2(1):11PubMedCrossRef
2.
NICE (2004) Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. The Manual. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
3.
Brown V et al (2001) The development and evaluation of an instrument to assess the adverse effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Final report WaSHN Trust, West Sussex
4.
National Cancer Alliance (1996) Patient centred cancer services? What patients say. NCA, Oxford
5.
National Audit Office (2005) Tackling cancer: improving the patient journey. National Audit Office, London
6.
Farrell C, Lewis J (2000) The cancer experience. National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), London
7.
8.
Wilkinson SM et al (2003) Can intensive three-day programmes improve nurses' communication skills in cancer care? Psycho-oncology 12(8):747–759PubMedCrossRef
9.
Department of Health, Health Service Circular 2002/001/LAC (2002) 1-Guidance on the single assessment process for older people, 2002. Department of Health, London
10.
Glasziou P et al (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11.
Bowling A (2001) Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckinghamshire
12.
Bowling A (2005) Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales, 3rd edn. Open University Press, Berkshire
13.
Fitzpatrick R et al (1998) Evaluating patient-outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2(14):1–74PubMed
14.
Hearn J, Higginson I (1997) Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health Med 19(2):193–199PubMed
15.
16.
Carr AJ et al (2003) Quality of life. BMJ, London
17.
McHorney C, Tarvlov A (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307PubMedCrossRef
18.
Corcoran K, Fischer J (1987) Measures for clinical practice: a sourcebook. The Free Press, London
19.
Osse BH et al (2000) Assessment of the need for palliative care as perceived by individual cancer patients and their families: a review of instruments for improving patient participation in palliative care. Cancer 88(4):900–911PubMedCrossRef
20.
Fitzsimmons D, Ahmedzai S (2004) In: Payne S, Seymour J, Ingleton C (eds) Approaches to assessment in palliative care, in palliative care nursing: principles and evidence for practice. Open University Press, Berkshire, pp 163–185
21.
Ahmedzai SH et al (2004) Improving access to specialist palliative care: Developing a screening measure to assess the distress caused by advanced illness that may require referral to specialist palliative care. Sheffield Palliative Care Studies Group: University of Sheffield and Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield
22.
McCusker J (1984) Development of scales to measure satisfaction and preferences regarding long-term and terminal care. Med Care 22(5):476–493PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
Aspinal F et al (2002) A user’s guide to the palliative care outcome scale. Palliative Care and Policy Publications, Kings College, London
25.
Ellershaw JE, Peat SJ, Boys LC (1995) Assessing the effectiveness of a hospital palliative care team. Palliat Med 9:145–152PubMed
26.
Higginson IJ, McCarthy M (1993) Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 7:219–228PubMed
27.
Gates MF, Lackey NR, White MR (1995) Needs of Hospice and clinic patients with cancer. Cancer Pract 3(4):226–232PubMed
28.
Thomas C et al (2001) What are the psychosocial needs of cancer patients and their main carers? A study of user experience of cancer services with particular reference to psychosocial need. Project Report. Lancaster University, Institute for Health Research
29.
Ganz PA et al (1992) The CARES: a generic measure of health-related quality of life for patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1:19–29PubMedCrossRef
30.
Schag CA et al (1994) Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 3:127–141PubMedCrossRef
31.
Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz P (1983) Cancer inventory of problem situations: an instrument for assessing cancer patients' rehabilitation needs. J Psychosoc Oncol 1(4):11–24CrossRef
32.
Fortner B et al (2003) The cancer care monitor: psychometric content evaluation and pilot testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26(6):1077–1092PubMedCrossRef
33.
Ruland CM (1999) Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: effects on nursing care and patient outcomes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6(4):304–312PubMed
34.
Ruland CM (2002) Handheld technology to improve patient care: evaluating a support system for preference-based care planning at the bedside. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9(2):192–201PubMedCrossRef
35.
Ruland CM et al (2003) Effects of a computerized system to support shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(6):573–579PubMedCrossRef
36.
Harrison J et al (1994) Concerns, confiding and psychiatric disorder in newly diagnosed cancer patients: a descriptive study. Psycho-oncology 3:173–179CrossRef
37.
Heaven CM, Maguire P (1997) Disclosure of concerns by hospice patients and their identification by nurses. Palliat Med 11:283–290PubMed
38.
Heaven CM, Maguire P (1998) The relationship between patients’ concerns and psychological distress in a hospice setting. Psycho-Oncology 7:502–507PubMedCrossRef
39.
Heaven CM, Maguire P (1996) Training hospice nurses to elicit patients concerns. J Adv Nurs 23:280–286PubMedCrossRef
40.
Devlen J (1984) Psychological and social aspects of Hodgkins disease and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. University of Manchester, Manchester
41.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Distress Management (2003) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN): clinical practice guidelines in oncology, vol 1, 2003
42.
Crooks DL et al (2004) The Initial Health Assessment: an intervention to identify the supportive care needs of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 12(1):19–24PubMedCrossRef
43.
Asadi-Lari M, Tamburini M, Gray D (2004) Patients’ needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: towards a comprehensive model. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:32PubMedCrossRef
44.
Tamburini M et al (2000) Assessment of hospitalized cancer patients’ needs by the needs evaluation questionnaire. Ann Oncol 11:31–37PubMedCrossRef
45.
Tamburini M et al (2003) Cancer patients' needs during hospitalisation: a quantitative and qualitative study. BMC Cancer 3(12)
46.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1998) The promise of a good death. Lancet 351(Suppl 2):S21–S29
47.
Emanuel LL et al (2000) What terminally ill patients care about: toward a validated construct of patients' perspectives. J Palliat Med 3(4):419–431PubMedCrossRef
48.
Emanuel LL, Alpert HR, Emanuel EE (2001) Concise screening questions for clinical assessments of terminal care: the needs near the end-of-life care screening tool. J Palliat Med 4(4):465–474PubMedCrossRef
49.
Romsaas EP et al (1983) A method for assessing the rehabilitation needs of oncology outpatients. Oncol Nurs Forum 10(3):17–21PubMed
50.
Coyle N et al (1996) Development and validation of a patient needs assessment tool (PNAT) for oncology clinicians. Cancer Nurs 19(2):81–92PubMedCrossRef
51.
Osse BH et al (2004) Towards a new clinical tool for needs assessment in the palliative care of cancer patients: the PNPC instrument. J Pain Symptom Manage 28(4):329–341PubMedCrossRef
52.
Osse BHP et al (2002) Problems to discuss with cancer patients in palliative care: a comprehensive approach. Patient Educ Couns 47(3):195–204PubMedCrossRef
53.
Cull A, Stewart M, Altman D (1995) Assessment of and intervention for psychosocial problems in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 72:229–235PubMed
54.
55.
Bonevski B et al (2000) Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:217–225PubMedCrossRef
56.
McElduff P et al (2004) Supportive care needs survey: a guide to administration, scoring and analysis. Centre for Health Research and Psycho-oncology (CHeRP). The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
57.
Foot G, Sanson-Fisher R (1995) Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 19:131–135
58.
Ahmed N et al (2004) Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals. Palliat Med 18(6):525–542PubMedCrossRef
59.
Bestall JC et al (2004) Access and referral to specialist palliative care: Patients’ and professionals' experiences. Int J Palliat Nurs 10(8):381–389PubMed
60.
Butters EM et al (2005) Assessing symptoms and concerns in patients with advanced cancer: the validity and reliability of a checklist for use in clinical practice (unpublished)
61.
Butters EM et al (2005) Assessing symptoms and concerns in patients with advanced cancer: the development of a checklist for use in clinical practice (unpublished)
62.
Lidstone V et al (2003) Symptoms and concerns amongst cancer outpatients: identifying the need for specialist palliative care. Palliat Med 17:588–595PubMedCrossRef
63.
Jacobsen S (1992) Evaluating instruments for use in clinical nursing research. In: Frank-Stromborg M, Olsen S (eds) Instruments for Clinical Health-care Research. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, Massachusetts, pp 3–19
64.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
65.
Schag CC, Ganz PA, Heinrich RL (1991) Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system–short form (CARES-SF). A cancer specific rehabilitation and quality of life instrument. Cancer 68(6):1406–1413PubMedCrossRef
66.
Velikova G et al (2002) Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51–59PubMedCrossRef
67.
Velikova G et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998–1007PubMed
68.
McLachlan SA et al (2001) Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19(21):4117–4125PubMed
69.
Richardson A et al (2005) Patients’ needs assessment tools in cancer care: principles and practice. King’s College London, London
Metadata
Title
Patients’ needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools
Authors
Alison Richardson
Jibby Medina
Vivienne Brown
John Sitzia
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0205-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2007 Go to the issue

Original Article

Nail changes due to docetaxel—a neglected side effect and nuisance for the patient

Original Article

Prospective evaluation of fatigue during a course of curative radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer

Original Article

Oral cryotherapy reduces mucositis and opioid use after myeloablative therapy—a randomized controlled trial

Original Article

Decreases in pain at rest and movement-related pain during zoledronic acid treatment in patients with bone metastases due to breast or prostate cancer: a pilot study

Supportive Care International

The last 3 days of life in three different care settings in The Netherlands

Original Article

What symptom and functional dimensions can be predictors for global ratings of overall quality of life in lung cancer patients?
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits