Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2007

01-04-2007 | Original Article

Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Authors: J. Herrstedt, TC Sigsgaard, HA Nielsen, J. Handberg, SW Langer, S. Ottesen, P. Dombernowsky

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo during 4 cycles of multiple-day, cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

82 chemotherapy-naive patients with germ cell cancer scheduled to 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (20 or 40 mg/m2/day for 5 days) given every 3 weeks were included. A double-blind parallel trial design was used and patients randomized to tropisetron plus metopimazine or tropisetron plus placebo. Tropisetron was administered as a single 5 mg intravenous dose on days 1–5 and a single 5 mg oral dose on day 6, and metopimazine as 30 mg orally t.i.d. on day 1, and q.i.d on days 2–6.

Results

Patients were evaluable for efficacy during a total of 195 cycles. Small, but certain advantages were obtained with the combination. In cycle 1, complete protection from emetic episodes on day 1, days 1–5, days 6–9 and days 1–9 was achieved in 85.7%, 42.9%, 86.2% and 40.5% with tropisetron plus metopimazine and in 90.0%, 22.5%, 64.3% and 17.5% with tropisetron plus placebo, respectively. This difference achieved statistical significance in the overall period, days 1–9 (P = 0.029). During the entire period (days 1–9), significantly less nausea was seen in patients receiving tropisetron plus metopimazine (P = 0.027), whereas other nausea parameters did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative emetic protection rate after 4 cycles was 0.51 with tropisetron plus metopimazine and 0.25 with tropisetron plus placebo (P = 0.037). Side effects were generally few and mild with both treatments and no significant differences were seen.

Conclusion

Tropisetron plus metopimazine is superior to tropisetron during 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but both treatments are ineffective in a number of patients. The effect of the combination seems comparable to that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone. Newer drugs such as the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist, aprepitant, should be investigated to optimize antiemetic therapy in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grunberg SM, Osoba D, Hesketh PJ et al (2005) Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity—an update. Support Care Cancer 13:80–84PubMedCrossRef Grunberg SM, Osoba D, Hesketh PJ et al (2005) Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity—an update. Support Care Cancer 13:80–84PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Antiemetic subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (1998) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the Perugia Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 9:811–819 Antiemetic subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (1998) Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the Perugia Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 9:811–819
3.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Aapro MS, Smyth JF et al (1998) Corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists and other drugs. Support Care Cancer 6:204–214PubMedCrossRef Herrstedt J, Aapro MS, Smyth JF et al (1998) Corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists and other drugs. Support Care Cancer 6:204–214PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference van den Berkmortel F, de Wit R, de Rooy J, de Mulder P (2004) Osteonecrosis in patients with testicular tumours treated with chemotherapy. Neth J Med 62:23–26PubMed van den Berkmortel F, de Wit R, de Rooy J, de Mulder P (2004) Osteonecrosis in patients with testicular tumours treated with chemotherapy. Neth J Med 62:23–26PubMed
5.
go back to reference Winquist EW, Bauman GS, Balogh J (2001). Nontraumatic osteonecrosis after chemotherapy for testicular cancer: a systematic review. Am J Clin Oncol 24:603–606PubMedCrossRef Winquist EW, Bauman GS, Balogh J (2001). Nontraumatic osteonecrosis after chemotherapy for testicular cancer: a systematic review. Am J Clin Oncol 24:603–606PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haid M (1981) Steroid antiemesis may be harmful. N Engl J Med 304:1237PubMed Haid M (1981) Steroid antiemesis may be harmful. N Engl J Med 304:1237PubMed
7.
go back to reference Marigini G, Murray S, Goldhirsch A (1996) The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 7:245–250 Marigini G, Murray S, Goldhirsch A (1996) The effect of adjuvant prednisone combined with CMF on patterns of relapse and occurrence of second malignancies in patients with breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 7:245–250
8.
go back to reference Moertel CG, Reitemeier RJ (1973) Controlled studies of metopimazine for treatment of nausea and vomiting. J Clin Pharmacol 13:283–287PubMed Moertel CG, Reitemeier RJ (1973) Controlled studies of metopimazine for treatment of nausea and vomiting. J Clin Pharmacol 13:283–287PubMed
9.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Sigsgaard T, Boesgaard M, Jensen TP, Dombernowsky P (1993) Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron alone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 328:1076–1080PubMedCrossRef Herrstedt J, Sigsgaard T, Boesgaard M, Jensen TP, Dombernowsky P (1993) Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron alone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 328:1076–1080PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Sigsgaard T, Handberg J et al (1997) Randomized, double-blind comparison of ondansetron versus ondansetron plus metopimazine as antiemetic prophylaxis during platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:1690–1696PubMed Herrstedt J, Sigsgaard T, Handberg J et al (1997) Randomized, double-blind comparison of ondansetron versus ondansetron plus metopimazine as antiemetic prophylaxis during platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:1690–1696PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lebeau B, Depierre A, GIiovanni et al (1997) The efficacy of a combination of ondansetron, methylprednisolone and metopimazine in patients previously uncontrolled with a dual antiemetic treatment in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The French Ondansetron Study Group. Ann Oncol 8:887–892PubMedCrossRef Lebeau B, Depierre A, GIiovanni et al (1997) The efficacy of a combination of ondansetron, methylprednisolone and metopimazine in patients previously uncontrolled with a dual antiemetic treatment in cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The French Ondansetron Study Group. Ann Oncol 8:887–892PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference de Wit R, Schmitz PIM, Verweij J et al (1996) Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained. J Clin Oncol 14:644–651PubMed de Wit R, Schmitz PIM, Verweij J et al (1996) Analysis of cumulative probabilities shows that the efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonist prophylaxis is not maintained. J Clin Oncol 14:644–651PubMed
13.
go back to reference Blijham GH (1992) Does granisetron remain effective over multiple cycles? Eur J Cancer 28A (Suppl 1):S17–S21PubMedCrossRef Blijham GH (1992) Does granisetron remain effective over multiple cycles? Eur J Cancer 28A (Suppl 1):S17–S21PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Jørgensen M, Angelo HR (1990) The effect of food on serum concentrations of metopimazine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 30:237–243PubMed Herrstedt J, Jørgensen M, Angelo HR (1990) The effect of food on serum concentrations of metopimazine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 30:237–243PubMed
15.
go back to reference Einhorn LH, Rapoport B, Koeller J et al (2005) Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statement. Support Care Cancer 13:112–116PubMedCrossRef Einhorn LH, Rapoport B, Koeller J et al (2005) Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statement. Support Care Cancer 13:112–116PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Handberg J, Kjær M, Dombernowsky P (2001) Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 19:2091–2097PubMed Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Handberg J, Kjær M, Dombernowsky P (2001) Ondansetron plus metopimazine compared with ondansetron plus metopimazine plus prednisolone as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 19:2091–2097PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Andersen LJ et al (1999) Granisetron compared with prednisolone plus metopimazine as anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients receiving multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 80:412–418PubMedCrossRef Sigsgaard T, Herrstedt J, Andersen LJ et al (1999) Granisetron compared with prednisolone plus metopimazine as anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients receiving multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 80:412–418PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference The Granisetron Study Group (1993) The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy over 5 days. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 119:555–559CrossRef The Granisetron Study Group (1993) The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy over 5 days. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 119:555–559CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bremer K on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group (1992) A single-blind study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous granisetron compared with alizapride plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis and control of emesis in patients receiving 5-day cytostatic therapy. Eur J Cancer 28A:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef Bremer K on behalf of the Granisetron Study Group (1992) A single-blind study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous granisetron compared with alizapride plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis and control of emesis in patients receiving 5-day cytostatic therapy. Eur J Cancer 28A:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sledge GW, Einhorn LH, Nagy C, House K (1992) Phase III double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 70:2524–2528PubMedCrossRef Sledge GW, Einhorn LH, Nagy C, House K (1992) Phase III double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 70:2524–2528PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Noble A, Bremer K, Goedhals D et al (1994) A double-blind, randomised, crossover comparison of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: assessment of efficacy, safety and patient preference. Eur J Cancer 30A:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef Noble A, Bremer K, Goedhals D et al (1994) A double-blind, randomised, crossover comparison of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: assessment of efficacy, safety and patient preference. Eur J Cancer 30A:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fox SM, Einhorn LH, Cox E et al (1993) Ondansetron versus ondansetron, dexamethasone, and chlorpromazine in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:2391–2395PubMed Fox SM, Einhorn LH, Cox E et al (1993) Ondansetron versus ondansetron, dexamethasone, and chlorpromazine in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11:2391–2395PubMed
23.
go back to reference Räth U, Upadhyaya BK, Arechavala E et al (1993) Role of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in fractionated chemotherapy. Oncology 50:168–172PubMedCrossRef Räth U, Upadhyaya BK, Arechavala E et al (1993) Role of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in fractionated chemotherapy. Oncology 50:168–172PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Double-blind, dose-finding study of four intravenous doses of dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis. J Clin Oncol 16:2937–2942 Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1998) Double-blind, dose-finding study of four intravenous doses of dexamethasone in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis. J Clin Oncol 16:2937–2942
25.
go back to reference Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098PubMedCrossRef Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al (2003) Addition of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 97:3090–3098PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119PubMedCrossRef Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al (2003) The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4112–4119PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:2822–2830PubMedCrossRef Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:2822–2830PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B et al (2004) The oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant given with standard antiemetics provided protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a combined analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials. Eur J Cancer 40:403–410PubMed de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B et al (2004) The oral NK1 antagonist aprepitant given with standard antiemetics provided protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a combined analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trials. Eur J Cancer 40:403–410PubMed
29.
go back to reference Herrstedt J, Muss HB, Warr DG et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis over multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 104:1548–1555PubMedCrossRef Herrstedt J, Muss HB, Warr DG et al (2005) Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis over multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Cancer 104:1548–1555PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J (2006) The Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28PubMedCrossRef Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J (2006) The Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol 17:20–28PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy
Authors
J. Herrstedt
TC Sigsgaard
HA Nielsen
J. Handberg
SW Langer
S. Ottesen
P. Dombernowsky
Publication date
01-04-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0158-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2007 Go to the issue

Forthcoming Meetings

Forthcoming Meetings

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine