Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Original Article

Cancer patients’ preferences for communication of unfavourable news: an Asian perspective

Authors: Li-Qi Chiu, Wei-Shan Delice Lee, Fei Gao, Patricia A. Parker, Gim-Yew Ng, Chee-Keong Toh

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

It is important to understand cancer patients’ preferences for communication as it impacts on how unfavourable news should be delivered in such a way as not to demoralize the patients while at the same time maintain good doctor–patient relationships. However, few studies have been undertaken in the Asian countries. This study aims to determine the preferences of cancer patients regarding the disclosure of unfavourable news in an Asian population in Singapore. Two hundred cancer patients at the National Cancer Centre, Singapore, completed a Measure of Patients’ Preferences (MPP) questionnaire on how they would like their physicians to tell them unfavourable news about their condition. The patients rated the content and context of the communication as well as the physicians’ characteristics on a five-point Likert scale. Items that scored the highest mostly related to physicians’ expertise and content of the interaction, while those relating to the supportive aspects scored the lowest. Gender was significantly associated with scores on the support subscale of the MPP such that women reported that the supportive elements were more important than the men did. No other demographic and medical characteristics were associated with patients’ preferences. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two main factors, which accounted for 79.38% of the common variance. Patients’ preferences in our local Asian population are fairly similar to those obtained from other studies conducted in the West, despite possible socio-cultural differences such as the use of euphemisms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA et al (1992) Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 20:2189–2196CrossRef Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA et al (1992) Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 20:2189–2196CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Butow PN, Karzemi JN, Beeney LJ et al (1996) When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77:2630–2637CrossRefPubMed Butow PN, Karzemi JN, Beeney LJ et al (1996) When the diagnosis is cancer: patient communication experiences and preferences. Cancer 77:2630–2637CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM et al (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8:857–863PubMedCrossRef Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM et al (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8:857–863PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004) Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int 93:47–51CrossRefPubMed Davison BJ, Parker PA, Goldenberg SL (2004) Patients’ preferences for communicating a prostate cancer diagnosis and participating in medical decision-making. BJU Int 93:47–51CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (1999) Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer 35:1592–1597CrossRefPubMed Fallowfield L, Jenkins V (1999) Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer 35:1592–1597CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW (1995) Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners. J Clin Oncol 13:2449–2456PubMed Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW (1995) Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners. J Clin Oncol 13:2449–2456PubMed
7.
go back to reference Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Schofield MJ (1999) Is there consensus between breast cancer patients and providers on guidelines for breaking bad news? Behav Med 25:69–77PubMedCrossRef Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Schofield MJ (1999) Is there consensus between breast cancer patients and providers on guidelines for breaking bad news? Behav Med 25:69–77PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goldberg RJ (1984) Disclosure of information to adult cancer patients: issues and update. J Clin Oncol 2:948–955PubMed Goldberg RJ (1984) Disclosure of information to adult cancer patients: issues and update. J Clin Oncol 2:948–955PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM et al (2005) Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23:1278–1288. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 23:3652CrossRefPubMed Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM et al (2005) Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis. J Clin Oncol 23:1278–1288. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol 23:3652CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB et al (1997) Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med 127:1–12PubMed Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB et al (1997) Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med 127:1–12PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lapine A, Wang-Cheng R, Goldstein M et al (2001) When cultures clash: physician, patient, and family wishes in truth disclosure for dying patients. J Palliat Med 4:475–480CrossRefPubMed Lapine A, Wang-Cheng R, Goldstein M et al (2001) When cultures clash: physician, patient, and family wishes in truth disclosure for dying patients. J Palliat Med 4:475–480CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Levinson W (1994) Physician–patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention. JAMA 272:1619–1620CrossRefPubMed Levinson W (1994) Physician–patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention. JAMA 272:1619–1620CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Maguire P, Faulkner A (1998) Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. BMJ 297:907–909CrossRef Maguire P, Faulkner A (1998) Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions. BMJ 297:907–909CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C et al (2001) Breaking bad news about cancer: patients’ preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol 19:2049–2056PubMed Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C et al (2001) Breaking bad news about cancer: patients’ preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol 19:2049–2056PubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Roberts CS, Cox CE, Reintgen DS et al (1994) Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients’ psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer 74 (Suppl 1):S336–S341CrossRef Roberts CS, Cox CE, Reintgen DS et al (1994) Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients’ psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer 74 (Suppl 1):S336–S341CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD et al (1999) Patient–physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med 159:997–1004CrossRefPubMed Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD et al (1999) Patient–physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med 159:997–1004CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Seo M, Tamura K, Shijo H et al (2000) Telling the diagnosis to cancer patients in Japan: attitude and perception of patients, physicians and nurses. Palliat Med 14:105–110CrossRefPubMed Seo M, Tamura K, Shijo H et al (2000) Telling the diagnosis to cancer patients in Japan: attitude and perception of patients, physicians and nurses. Palliat Med 14:105–110CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Shrank WH, Kutner JS, Richardson T et al (2005) Focus group findings about the influence of culture on communication preferences in end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med 20:703–709CrossRefPubMed Shrank WH, Kutner JS, Richardson T et al (2005) Focus group findings about the influence of culture on communication preferences in end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med 20:703–709CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stewart MA (1995) Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 152:1423–1433PubMed Stewart MA (1995) Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 152:1423–1433PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tang ST, Lee SY (2004) Cancer diagnosis and prognosis in Taiwan: patient preferences versus experiences. Psychooncology 13:1–13PubMed Tang ST, Lee SY (2004) Cancer diagnosis and prognosis in Taiwan: patient preferences versus experiences. Psychooncology 13:1–13PubMed
22.
go back to reference Tucker CM, Herman KC, Pedersen TR et al (2003) Cultural sensitivity in physician–patient relationships: perspectives of an ethnically diverse sample of low-income primary care patients. Med Care 41:859–870. Erratum in: Med Care 41:1330CrossRefPubMed Tucker CM, Herman KC, Pedersen TR et al (2003) Cultural sensitivity in physician–patient relationships: perspectives of an ethnically diverse sample of low-income primary care patients. Med Care 41:859–870. Erratum in: Med Care 41:1330CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cancer patients’ preferences for communication of unfavourable news: an Asian perspective
Authors
Li-Qi Chiu
Wei-Shan Delice Lee
Fei Gao
Patricia A. Parker
Gim-Yew Ng
Chee-Keong Toh
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0911-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2006 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine