Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2003

01-12-2003 | Original Article

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies

Authors: C. Harter, T. Ostendorf, A. Bach, G. Egerer, H. Goldschmidt, A. D. Ho

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In contrast to the high risk of haemorrhage associated with the implantation of a central venous catheter (CVC) via the internal jugular or subclavian access, the use of a peripherally inserted catheter (PICC) offers the advantage of a lower risk of bleeding complications. However, the rate of phlebitis is higher with the PICC and its use has been declining. We have studied the benefits and adverse events of a new type of PICC and a common type.

Methods

From October 1999 to October 2001, 70 PICCs (Olimpicc, Vygon, Germany, n=40; and LIFECATH-PICC(PUR)5FR Vygon, Germany, n=30) were inserted into 66 patients with haematological malignancies and used for high-dose chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition and autologous blood stem cell transplantation. While removing the catheter, central and peripheral blood cultures were taken. The catheter tip was investigated by the semi-quantitative roll-out method of Maki.

Results

Sixty-five PICCs were removed after a median of 8.9 days. In five cases a catheter-associated significant colonisation with coagulase-negative staphylococci occurred. In two instances catheter-related bacteraemia was found.

Conclusion

In our study this catheter system was inserted in 94% of patients without problems and showed a low incidence of phlebitis (5/65). Because of the high rate of catheter malfunction reported during and after our study, the Olimpicc catheter is no longer available. The PICC system, and the LIFECATH-PICC(PUR)5FR in particular, offers a safe and effective alternative for central venous access to the internal jugular vein.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allen AW, Megargell JL, Brown DB, Lynch FC, Singh H, Singh Y, Waybill PN (2000) Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(10):1309–1314PubMed Allen AW, Megargell JL, Brown DB, Lynch FC, Singh H, Singh Y, Waybill PN (2000) Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(10):1309–1314PubMed
2.
go back to reference Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB (1999) Clinical factors associated with the development of phlebitis after insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter. Nurs 22:36–42 Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB (1999) Clinical factors associated with the development of phlebitis after insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter. Nurs 22:36–42
3.
go back to reference Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB (2000) Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters. Crit Care Med 28:3833–3836PubMed Black IH, Blosser SA, Murray WB (2000) Central venous pressure measurements: peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters. Crit Care Med 28:3833–3836PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bottino J, McCredie KB, Groschel DH, Lawson M (1979) Long-term intravenous therapy with peripherally inserted silicone elastomer central venous catheters in patients with malignant diseases. Cancer 43(5):1937–1943PubMed Bottino J, McCredie KB, Groschel DH, Lawson M (1979) Long-term intravenous therapy with peripherally inserted silicone elastomer central venous catheters in patients with malignant diseases. Cancer 43(5):1937–1943PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cardella JF, Cardella K, Bacci N, Fox PS, Post JH (1996) Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7:5–13PubMed Cardella JF, Cardella K, Bacci N, Fox PS, Post JH (1996) Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution. J Vasc Interv Radiol 7:5–13PubMed
6.
go back to reference Dolcourt JL, Bose CL (1980) Percutaneous insertion of silastic central venous catheters in newborn. Pediatrics 70:484–486 Dolcourt JL, Bose CL (1980) Percutaneous insertion of silastic central venous catheters in newborn. Pediatrics 70:484–486
7.
go back to reference Giuffrida DJ, Bryan-Brown CW, Lumb PD, Kwun KB, Rhoades HM (1986) Central vs peripheral venous catheters in critically ill patients. Chest 90(6):806–809PubMed Giuffrida DJ, Bryan-Brown CW, Lumb PD, Kwun KB, Rhoades HM (1986) Central vs peripheral venous catheters in critically ill patients. Chest 90(6):806–809PubMed
8.
go back to reference Grove JR, Pevec WC (2000) Venous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(7):837–840PubMed Grove JR, Pevec WC (2000) Venous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(7):837–840PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kyle SK, Myers JS (1990) Peripherally inserted central catheters: Development of a hospital based program. J Intraven Nurs 13:287–290PubMed Kyle SK, Myers JS (1990) Peripherally inserted central catheters: Development of a hospital based program. J Intraven Nurs 13:287–290PubMed
10.
go back to reference Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309PubMed Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309PubMed
11.
go back to reference Markel S, Reynen K (1990) Impact on patient care: 2652 PIC catheter days in the alternative setting. J Intraven Nurs 13:347–351PubMed Markel S, Reynen K (1990) Impact on patient care: 2652 PIC catheter days in the alternative setting. J Intraven Nurs 13:347–351PubMed
12.
go back to reference Merrell SW, Peatross BG, Grossman MD, et al (1994) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access. West J Med 160:125–130 Merrell SW, Peatross BG, Grossman MD, et al (1994) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access. West J Med 160:125–130
13.
go back to reference Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L (1997) Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 72:225–233PubMed Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L (1997) Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 72:225–233PubMed
14.
go back to reference Paz-Fumagalli R, Miller YA, Russell BA, Crain MR, Beres RA, Mewissen MW (1997) Impact of peripherally inserted central catheters on phlebitic complications of peripheral intravenous therapy in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 20(3):341–344PubMed Paz-Fumagalli R, Miller YA, Russell BA, Crain MR, Beres RA, Mewissen MW (1997) Impact of peripherally inserted central catheters on phlebitic complications of peripheral intravenous therapy in spinal cord injury patients. J Spinal Cord Med 20(3):341–344PubMed
15.
go back to reference Puntis JWL (1986) Percutaneous insertion of central venous feeding catheters. Arch Dis Child 61:1138–1140PubMed Puntis JWL (1986) Percutaneous insertion of central venous feeding catheters. Arch Dis Child 61:1138–1140PubMed
16.
go back to reference Shaw JCL (1973) Parenteral nutrition in the management of sick low birthweight infants. In: Gluck L (ed) Pediatr Clin North Am Saunders, Philadelphia, 20:333–358 Shaw JCL (1973) Parenteral nutrition in the management of sick low birthweight infants. In: Gluck L (ed) Pediatr Clin North Am Saunders, Philadelphia, 20:333–358
17.
go back to reference Sheppard R, Ong TH (1980) Evaluation of percutaneously inserted peripheral silicone catheters for parental nutrition in infants and children. Aust Paediatr J 16:181–184PubMed Sheppard R, Ong TH (1980) Evaluation of percutaneously inserted peripheral silicone catheters for parental nutrition in infants and children. Aust Paediatr J 16:181–184PubMed
18.
go back to reference Sherertz et al (1997) The risk of peripheral vein phlebitis associated with chlorhexidin-coated catheters: a randomized, double-blind trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18:230–236PubMed Sherertz et al (1997) The risk of peripheral vein phlebitis associated with chlorhexidin-coated catheters: a randomized, double-blind trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 18:230–236PubMed
19.
go back to reference Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD (1998) Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited Am J Surg 176(2):208–211CrossRef Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD (1998) Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited Am J Surg 176(2):208–211CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sweed M, Guenter P, Lucente K, Turner JL, Weingarten MS (1995) Long-term central venous catheters in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Infect Control 23(3):194–199PubMed Sweed M, Guenter P, Lucente K, Turner JL, Weingarten MS (1995) Long-term central venous catheters in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Infect Control 23(3):194–199PubMed
21.
go back to reference Williams J, Smith HL, Woods CG, Weller PH (1988) Silastic catheters for antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 63:658–659PubMed Williams J, Smith HL, Woods CG, Weller PH (1988) Silastic catheters for antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 63:658–659PubMed
Metadata
Title
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies
Authors
C. Harter
T. Ostendorf
A. Bach
G. Egerer
H. Goldschmidt
A. D. Ho
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2003
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-003-0517-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2003

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2003 Go to the issue

Society News

December 2003

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine