Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2021

01-04-2021 | Endoscopy | Dynamic Manuscript

Endoscopic rescue of early percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube dislodgement

Authors: R. M. Juza, S. Docimo, S. Drexel, V. Sandoval, J. M. Marks, E. M. Pauli

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is one of the most common methods for establishing durable enteral access. Early PEG dislodgement occurs in < 5% of cases but typically prompts urgent surgical intervention to reestablish the gastrocutaneous tract and prevent intra-abdominal sepsis. To date, there is a single case report in the literature where successful endoscopic “rescue” of an early dislodged PEG tube negated the need for operative intervention. Here, we report our experience with a series of endoscopic PEG rescues for early dislodged PEG tubes.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of cases was reviewed from two institutions. Patients with early PEG dislodgements underwent PEG rescue using a gastroscope and standard Ponsky “Pull” PEG techniques through the original tract.

Results

Eleven patients were identified from the database and underwent PEG rescue after early PEG dislodgement. Mean operative time was 68 min, and there were no complications related to PEG rescue. PEG rescue permitted safe re-establishment of the gastrostomy tract while avoiding laparoscopic or open surgical intervention in hemodynamically stable patients. All patients tolerated the procedure well and were able to resume use of the PEG tubes shortly after intervention.

Conclusion

Endoscopic rescue represents a feasible noninvasive option for PEG tube replacement following early inadvertent PEG tube dislodgement in appropriate clinical settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Apelgren KN, Zambos J (1989) Is percutaneous better than open gastrostomy? A clinical study in one surgical department. Am Surg 55(9):596–600PubMed Apelgren KN, Zambos J (1989) Is percutaneous better than open gastrostomy? A clinical study in one surgical department. Am Surg 55(9):596–600PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pofahl WE, Ringold F (1999) Management of early dislodgment of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 9(4):253–256CrossRef Pofahl WE, Ringold F (1999) Management of early dislodgment of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 9(4):253–256CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Galat SA, Gerig KD, Porter JA, Slezak FA (1990) Management of premature removal of the percutaneous gastrostomy. Am Surg 56(11):733–736PubMed Galat SA, Gerig KD, Porter JA, Slezak FA (1990) Management of premature removal of the percutaneous gastrostomy. Am Surg 56(11):733–736PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lockett MA, Templeton ML, Byrne TK, Norcross ED (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications in a tertiary-care center. Am Surg 68(2):117–120PubMed Lockett MA, Templeton ML, Byrne TK, Norcross ED (2002) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy complications in a tertiary-care center. Am Surg 68(2):117–120PubMed
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic rescue of early percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube dislodgement
Authors
R. M. Juza
S. Docimo
S. Drexel
V. Sandoval
J. M. Marks
E. M. Pauli
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08203-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2021 Go to the issue