Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Laparotomy | Review Article

The risk of COVID-19 transmission by laparoscopic smoke may be lower than for laparotomy: a narrative review

Authors: Yoav Mintz, Alberto Arezzo, Luigi Boni, Ludovica Baldari, Elisa Cassinotti, Ronit Brodie, Selman Uranues, MinHua Zheng, Abe Fingerhut

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgical smoke is a well-recognized hazard in the operating room. At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical societies quickly published guidelines recommending avoiding laparoscopy or to consider open surgery because of the fear of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through surgical smoke or aerosol. This narrative review of the literature aimed to determine whether there are any differences in the creation of surgical smoke/aerosol between laparoscopy and laparotomy and if laparoscopy may be safer than laparotomy.

Methods

A literature search was performed using the Pubmed, Embase and Google scholar search engines, as well as manual search of the major journals with specific COVID-19 sections for ahead-of-print publications.

Results

Of 1098 identified articles, we critically appraised 50. Surgical smoke created by electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices has the same composition both in laparoscopy and laparotomy. SARS-CoV-2 has never been found in surgical smoke and there is currently no data to support its virulence if ever it could be transmitted through surgical smoke/aerosol.

Conclusion

If laparoscopy is performed in a closed cavity enabling containment of surgical smoke/aerosol, and proper evacuation of smoke with simple measures is respected, and as long as laparoscopy is not contraindicated, we believe that this surgical approach may be safer for the operating team while the patient has the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Evidence-based research in this field is needed for definitive determination of safety.
Literature
1.
Pierce JS, Lacey SE, Lippert JF et al (2011) Laser-generated air contaminants from medical laser applications: a state-of-the-science review of exposure characterization, health effects, and control. J Occup Environ Hyg 8(7):447–466CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP et al (2006) Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect 62(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Heinsohn P, Jewett DL (1993) Exposure to blood-containing aerosols in the operating room: a preliminary study. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 54:446–453CrossRefPubMed
17.
Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG (1987) Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? Lasers Surg Med 7:376–382CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Karjalainen M, Kontunen A, Saari S, Rönkkö T, Lekkala J, Roine A, Oksala N (2018) The characterization of surgical smoke from various tissues and its implications for occupational safety. PLoS ONE 13(4):e0195274CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Ragde SF, Jorgensen R, Foreland S (2016) Characterisation of exposure to ultrafine particles from surgcial smoke by use of a fast mobility particle sizer. Ann Occup Hyg 60:860–874CrossRefPubMed
21.
Nicola JH, Nicola EM, Vieira R et al (2002) Speed of particles ejected from animal skin by CO2 laser pulses, measured by laser Doppler velocimetry. Phys Med Biol 47(5):847–856CrossRefPubMed
22.
Nuyttens D, Schampheleire M, Baetens D, Dekeyser B (2008) Sonck, direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: Field drift experiments. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 73:763–767PubMed
23.
Champault G, Taffinder N, Ziol M, Riskalla H, Catheline JM (1997) Cells are present in the smoke created during laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84(7):993–995CrossRefPubMed
24.
Nduka CC, Poland N, Kennedy M, Dye J, Darzi A (1998) Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells? Surg Endosc 12(8):1031–1034CrossRefPubMed
25.
Li CI, Pai JY, Chen CH (2020) Characterization of smoke generated during the use of surgical knife in laparotomy surgeries. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 70(3):324–332CrossRefPubMed
26.
Choi C, Do IG, Song T (2018) Ultrasonic versus monopolar energy-based surgical devices in terms of surgical smoke and lateral thermal damage (ULMOST): a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 32(11):4415–4421CrossRefPubMed
27.
Barrett WL, Garber SM (2003) Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air? Surg Endosc 17(6):979–987CrossRefPubMed
28.
Mallick R, Odejinmi F, Clark TJ (2020) Covid 19 pandemic and gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: knowns and unknowns. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 12(1):3–7PubMed
29.
Capizzi PJ, Clay RP, Battey MJ (1998) Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris. Lasers Surg Med 23(3):172–174CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kwak HD, Kim S-H, Seo YS, Song KJ (2016) Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med 73:857–863PubMed
31.
Rioux M, Garland A, Webster D, Reardon E (2013) HPV positive tonsillar cancer in two laser surgeons: case reports. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 42(1):54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Sawchuck WS, Weber PJ, Lowy DR, Dzubow LM (1989) Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 21:41–49CrossRef
33.
Johnson GK, Robinson WS (1991) Human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) in the vapors of surgical power instruments. J Med Virol 33(1):47–50CrossRefPubMed
34.
Garden JM, O’Banion MK, Bakus AD, Olson C (2002) Viral disease transmitted by laser-generated plume (aerosol). Arch Dermatol 138:1303–1307CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Bree K, Barnhill S, Rundell W (2017) The dangers of electosurgical smoke to operating room personnel: a review. Workplace Health Saf 65(11):517–526CrossRefPubMed
37.
van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH et al (2020) Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. NEJM 382(16):1564–1567CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
Judson SD, van Doremalen N, Munster VJ (2020) Stability and viability of SARS-CoV-2 Reply. N Engl J Med. 13:382
40.
41.
42.
Ishida H, Murata N, Yamada H, Nomura T, Shimomura K, Fujioka M, Idezuki Y (2000) Influence of trocar placement and CO2 pneumoperitoneum on port site metastasis following laparoscopic tumor surgery. Surg Endosc 14(2):193–197CrossRefPubMed
43.
Ramirez PT, Wolf JK (2003) Levenback C Laparoscopic port-site metastases: etiology and prevention. Gynecol Oncol 91:179–189CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
46.
47.
Tian Y, Rong L, Nian W, He Y (2020) Review article: gastrointestinal features in COVID-19 and the possibility of fecal transmission. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 51(9):843–851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Wu Y, Guo C, Tang L, Hong Z, Zhou J, Dong X, Yin H, Xiao Q, Tang Y, Qu X, Kuang L, Fang X, Mishra N, Lu J, Shan H, Jiang G, Huang X (2020) Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in fecal samples. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(5):434–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Fingerhut A, Hanna GB, Veyrie N, Ferzli G, Millat B, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2010) Optimal trocar placement for ergonomic intracorporeal sewing and knotting in laparoscopic hiatal surgery. Am J Surg 200:519–528CrossRefPubMed
50.
Park JS, Ahn EJ, Ko DD, Kang H, Shin HY, Baek CH, Jung YH, Woo UC, Kim JY, Koo GH (2012) Effects of pneumoperitoneal pressure and position changes on respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic colectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 63:419–424CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The risk of COVID-19 transmission by laparoscopic smoke may be lower than for laparotomy: a narrative review
Authors
Yoav Mintz
Alberto Arezzo
Luigi Boni
Ludovica Baldari
Elisa Cassinotti
Ronit Brodie
Selman Uranues
MinHua Zheng
Abe Fingerhut
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07652-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020 Go to the issue

2019 SAGES Oral

Mass spectrometry transanal minimally invasive surgery (MS-TAMIS) to promote organ preservation in rectal cancer

2019 SAGES Oral

Comparative review of outcomes: laparoscopic and robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) access retrorectus repairs

2020 SAGES Oral

The role of preoperative workup in predicting dysphagia, dilation, or explantation after magnetic sphincter augmentation

OriginalPaper

Clinical efficacy of gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis and predictors of outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis using surgical pyloroplasty as a comparator group

2019 EAES Oral

Does endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty stand the test of time? Objective assessment of endoscopic ESG appearance and its relation to weight loss in a large group of consecutive patients

2020 SAGES Oral

Educational value of telementoring for a simulation-based fundamental use of surgical energy™ (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized controlled trial in surgical trainees