Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Sleeve Gastrectomy

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study

Authors: Sameh Hany Emile, Amr Madyan, Tarek Mahdy, Ayman Elshobaky, Hosam Ghazy Elbanna, Mohamed Anwar Abdel-Razik

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The present study aimed to compare the outcome of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in regards weight loss, improvement in comorbidities at 12 months of follow-up, and postoperative complications.

Methods

This was a case-matched, multicenter analysis of the outcome of patients who underwent SG or SASI bypass. Patients who underwent SASI bypass were matched with an equal number of patients who underwent SG in terms of age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. The main outcome measures were excess weight loss (EWL) at 6 and 12 months after surgery, improvement in medical comorbidities, and complications.

Results

A total of 116 patients (97 female) of a mean age of 35.8 years were included. Fifty-eight patients underwent SASI bypass and an equal number underwent SG. %EWL at 6 months postoperatively was similar between the two groups. SASI bypass conferred significantly higher %EWL at 12 months than SG (72.6 Vs 60.4, p < 0.0001). Improvement in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SASI bypass was better than SG (95.8% Vs 70% and 85.7% Vs 18.2%, respectively). SASI bypass required longer operation time than SG (108.7 Vs 92.8 min, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred in 12 (20.7%) patients after SG and 4 (6.9%) patients after SASI bypass (p = 0.056).

Conclusion

The %EWL at 12 months after SASI bypass was significantly higher than after SG. SASI bypass conferred better improvement in T2DM and GERD than SG. Both procedures had similar weight loss at 6 months postoperatively and comparable complication rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference McField D, Parker D, Petrick A, Strodel W, Benotti P, Gabrielsen J (2016) Surgery is more effective than medical management for treatment for weight loss failure after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):S182–S183CrossRef McField D, Parker D, Petrick A, Strodel W, Benotti P, Gabrielsen J (2016) Surgery is more effective than medical management for treatment for weight loss failure after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):S182–S183CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Emile SH, Elfeki H (2017) Nutritional deficiency after sleeve gastrectomy: a comprehensive literature review. EMJ Gastroenterol 6(1):99–105 Emile SH, Elfeki H (2017) Nutritional deficiency after sleeve gastrectomy: a comprehensive literature review. EMJ Gastroenterol 6(1):99–105
8.
go back to reference Lustig RH (2001) The neuroendocrinology of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30(3):765–785CrossRef Lustig RH (2001) The neuroendocrinology of obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 30(3):765–785CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MC et al (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: a potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obesity. Ann Surg 256(1):104–110CrossRef Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MC et al (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: a potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obesity. Ann Surg 256(1):104–110CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Salama TM, Sabry K, Ghamrini YE (2017) Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass: new step in the evolution of bariatric surgeries. J Investig Surg 30(5):291–296CrossRef Salama TM, Sabry K, Ghamrini YE (2017) Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass: new step in the evolution of bariatric surgeries. J Investig Surg 30(5):291–296CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vennapusa A, Bhargav RKP, Mukharjee SSM (2017) A feasibility study of novel “laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop gastroileal bypass” for obesity: an Indian experience. Int Surg 102(11–12):504–513CrossRef Vennapusa A, Bhargav RKP, Mukharjee SSM (2017) A feasibility study of novel “laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop gastroileal bypass” for obesity: an Indian experience. Int Surg 102(11–12):504–513CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE et al (2012) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 366(17):1567–1576CrossRef Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE et al (2012) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 366(17):1567–1576CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sharma A, Aggarwal S, Ahuja V, Bal C (2014) Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux before and after sleeve gastrectomy using symptom scoring, scintigraphy, and endoscopy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:600–605CrossRef Sharma A, Aggarwal S, Ahuja V, Bal C (2014) Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux before and after sleeve gastrectomy using symptom scoring, scintigraphy, and endoscopy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:600–605CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study
Authors
Sameh Hany Emile
Amr Madyan
Tarek Mahdy
Ayman Elshobaky
Hosam Ghazy Elbanna
Mohamed Anwar Abdel-Razik
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2021 Go to the issue