Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020

01-11-2020

Is the American College of Surgeons Online Communities a safe and useful venue to ask for surgical advice?

Authors: Karla Bernardi, Puja Shah, Erik P. Askenasy, Courtney Balentine, Mark M. Crabbe, Mario A. Cerame, John A. Harvin, Lillian Huang, Stefanos G. Millas, Patrick Molt, Tamara E. Saunders, Shinil K. Shah, Jerry Schwartz, Tien C. Ko, Tyler G. Hughes, Mike K. Liang, Surgical Social Media Study Group

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many surgeons rely on the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Community Forums for advice on managing complex patients. Our objective was to assess the safety and usefulness of advice provided on the most popular surgical forum.

Methods

Overall, 120 consecutive, deidentified clinical threads were extracted from the General Surgery community in reverse chronological order. Three groups of three surgeons (mixed academic and community perspectives) evaluated the 120 threads for unsafe or dangerous posts. Positive and negative controls for safe and unsafe answers were included in 20 threads, and reviewers were blinded to their presence. Reviewers were free to access all online and professional resources.

Results

There were 855 unique responses (median 7, 2–15 responses per thread) to the 120 clinical threads/scenarios. The review teams correctly identified all positive and negative controls for safety. While 58(43.3%) of threads contained unsafe advice, the majority (33, 56.9%) were corrected. Reviewers felt that a there was a standard of care response for 62/120 of the threads of which 50 (80.6%) were provided by the responses. Of the 855 responses, 107 (12.5%) were considered unsafe/dangerous.

Conclusion

The ACS Community Forums are generally a safe and useful resource for surgeons seeking advice for challenging cases. While unsafe or dangerous advice is not uncommon, other surgeons typically correct it. When utilizing the forums, advice should be taken as a congregate, and any single recommendation should be approached with healthy skepticism. However, social media such as the ACS Forums is self-regulating and can be an appropriate method for surgeons to communicate challenging problems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mary Modahl LT, Tracey Moorhead. Doctors, Patients & Social Media. 2011. Accessed June, 2018 Mary Modahl LT, Tracey Moorhead. Doctors, Patients & Social Media. 2011. Accessed June, 2018
3.
go back to reference Greene JA, Kesselheim AS (2010) Pharmaceutical marketing and the new social media. N Engl J Med 363(22):2087–2089CrossRef Greene JA, Kesselheim AS (2010) Pharmaceutical marketing and the new social media. N Engl J Med 363(22):2087–2089CrossRef
4.
go back to reference George DR, Rovniak LS, Kraschnewski JL (2013) Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(3):453–462CrossRef George DR, Rovniak LS, Kraschnewski JL (2013) Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine. Clin Obstet Gynecol 56(3):453–462CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J et al (2013) Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review. Acad Med 88(9):1376–1383CrossRef Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J et al (2013) Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review. Acad Med 88(9):1376–1383CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 287(21):2869–2871CrossRef Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 287(21):2869–2871CrossRef
7.
go back to reference DeCamp M (2012) Social media and medical professionalism: toward an expanded program. Arch Intern Med 172(18):1418–1419CrossRef DeCamp M (2012) Social media and medical professionalism: toward an expanded program. Arch Intern Med 172(18):1418–1419CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A (2018) Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 4(1):e3CrossRef Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A (2018) Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ 4(1):e3CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Decamp M (2012) Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities. Lancet 380(9840):472–473CrossRef Decamp M (2012) Social media guidance, conflicts of interest, and health inequalities. Lancet 380(9840):472–473CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McCarthy CP, DeCamp M, McEvoy JW (2018) Social media and physician conflict of interest. Am J Med 131(8):859–860CrossRef McCarthy CP, DeCamp M, McEvoy JW (2018) Social media and physician conflict of interest. Am J Med 131(8):859–860CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shillcutt SK, Silver JK (2018) Social media and advancement of women physicians. N Engl J Med 378(24):2342–2345CrossRef Shillcutt SK, Silver JK (2018) Social media and advancement of women physicians. N Engl J Med 378(24):2342–2345CrossRef
13.
go back to reference George DR, Green MJ (2012) Beyond good and evil: exploring medical trainee use of social media. Teach Learn Med 24(2):155–157CrossRef George DR, Green MJ (2012) Beyond good and evil: exploring medical trainee use of social media. Teach Learn Med 24(2):155–157CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Radcliffe K, Lyson HC, Barr-Walker J, Sarkar U (2019) Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):158CrossRef Radcliffe K, Lyson HC, Barr-Walker J, Sarkar U (2019) Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19(1):158CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688CrossRef Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Hartling L (2014) A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr 14:138CrossRef Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Hartling L (2014) A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr 14:138CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Adilman R, Rajmohan Y, Brooks E et al (2016) Social media use among physicians and trainees: results of a national medical oncology physician survey. J Oncol Pract. 12(1):79–80 e52-60CrossRef Adilman R, Rajmohan Y, Brooks E et al (2016) Social media use among physicians and trainees: results of a national medical oncology physician survey. J Oncol Pract. 12(1):79–80 e52-60CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR (2011) The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26(10):1168–1174CrossRef Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR (2011) The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26(10):1168–1174CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Erzinger FL, de Araujo WJB, Ordinola AAM et al (2018) Vascular forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases. J Vasc Bras 17(3):193–200CrossRef Erzinger FL, de Araujo WJB, Ordinola AAM et al (2018) Vascular forum: collective intelligence in the resolution of vascular clinical cases. J Vasc Bras 17(3):193–200CrossRef
20.
go back to reference DeCamp M (2015) Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships. Int Rev Psychiatry 27(2):97–105CrossRef DeCamp M (2015) Ethical issues when using social media for health outside professional relationships. Int Rev Psychiatry 27(2):97–105CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steele S, Adcock C, Steel A (2016) Ethical, legal and professional issues arising from social media coverage by UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services. Emerg Med J 33(1):57–60CrossRef Steele S, Adcock C, Steel A (2016) Ethical, legal and professional issues arising from social media coverage by UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services. Emerg Med J 33(1):57–60CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, Buchman SR, Preminger BA, Vercler CJ (2018) The ethical and professional use of social media in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):388e–398eCrossRef Bennett KG, Berlin NL, MacEachern MP, Buchman SR, Preminger BA, Vercler CJ (2018) The ethical and professional use of social media in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):388e–398eCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901CrossRef Giles J (2005) Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438(7070):900–901CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is the American College of Surgeons Online Communities a safe and useful venue to ask for surgical advice?
Authors
Karla Bernardi
Puja Shah
Erik P. Askenasy
Courtney Balentine
Mark M. Crabbe
Mario A. Cerame
John A. Harvin
Lillian Huang
Stefanos G. Millas
Patrick Molt
Tamara E. Saunders
Shinil K. Shah
Jerry Schwartz
Tien C. Ko
Tyler G. Hughes
Mike K. Liang
Surgical Social Media Study Group
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07299-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2020 Go to the issue