Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020

01-10-2020

Effects of surgical flow disruptions on surgeons’ resources: a pilot study

Authors: B. C. G. van Houwelingen, A.-F. Rutkowski, S. Ganni, P. S. Stepaniak, J. J. Jakimowicz

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surgery requires surgeons to allocate more attention and efforts than open surgery. A surgeon’s pool of resource is affected by the multiple occurrences of interruptions and distractions in the operating room. Surgical flow disruption has been addressed from a quantitative perspective. However, little is known on its impact on the surgeons’ physiological resources.

Methods

Three physiological markers, heat flux (HF), energy expenditure in metabolic equivalent of tasks and galvanic skin response were recorded using body sensor monitoring during the 21 surgical operations. The three markers, respectively, represent: stress, energy mobilization and task engagement. A total of 8 surgeons with different levels of expertise (expert vs. novice) were observed performing 21 surgical procedures categorized as short versus long. Factors of distractions were time-stamped, and triangulated with physiological markers. Two cases illustrate the impact of surgical flow disruptions on the surgeons.

Results

The results indicate that expert surgeons’ mental schemata are better organized than novices. Additionally, the physiological markers indicate that novice surgeons display a higher HF at the start (tendency p = .059) and at the end of procedures (p = .001) when compared to experts. However, during longer procedures, expert surgeons have higher HF at the start (p = .041) and at the end (p = .026), than at the start and end of a short procedure.

Conclusion

Data collected during this pilot study showed that interruptions and disruptions affect novice and expert surgeons differently. Surgical flow disruption appears to be taxing on the surgeons’ mental, emotional and physiological resources; as a function of the length and nature of the disruptions. Several training curricula have incorporated the use of virtual reality programs to train surgeons to cope with the new technology and equipment. We recommend integrating interruptions and distractions in virtual reality training programs as these impact the surgeons’ pool of resources.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:1204–1207PubMed
2.
Jakimowicz J, Cuschieri A (2005) Time for evidence-based minimal access surgery training—simulate or sink. Surg Endosc 19:1521–1522PubMed
3.
Zheng B, Cassera MA, Martinec DV, Spaun GO, Swanstrom LL (2010) Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks. Surg Endosc 24:45–50PubMed
4.
Cao CGL, Zhou M, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD (2007) Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1564–1569PubMed
5.
Balch CM, Freischlag JA, Shanafelt TD (2009) Stress and burnout among surgeons: understanding and managing the syndrome and avoiding the adverse consequences. Arch Surg 144(4):371–376PubMed
6.
Bitterman NJ (2006) Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room. J Clin Monit Comput 20:165–173PubMed
7.
Zheng B, Rieder E, Cassera MA, Martinec DV, Lee G, Panton ONM, Park A, Swanström LL (2012) Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. Surg Endosc 26:1352–1358PubMed
8.
Hobfoll SE, Freedy J (1993) Conservation of resources: a general stress theory applied to burnout. In: Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T (eds) Professional burnout: recent developments in theory and practice. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp 115–133
9.
Rutkowski A-F, Saunders C (2018) Emotional and cognitive overload: the dark side of information technology. Routledge, New York
10.
Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Michigan
11.
Monetta L, Joanette Y (2003) Specificity of the right hemisphere’s contribution to verbal communication: the cognitive resources hypothesis. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 11:203–211
12.
Zheng B, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, Swanström LL (2008) A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 22:2171–2177PubMed
13.
Wiegmann DA, ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Sundt TM (2007) Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation. Surgery 142:658–665PubMed
14.
15.
Palmer G, Abernathy JH, Swinton G, Allison D, Greenstein J, Shappell S, Juang K, Reeves ST (2013) Realizing improved patient care through human-centered operating room design: a human factors methodology for observing flow disruptions in the cardiothoracic operating room. Anesthesiology 119:1066–1077PubMed
16.
Cohen TN, Cabrera JS, Sisk OD, Welsh KL, Abernathy JH, Reeves ST, Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA, Boquet AJ (2016) Identifying workflow disruptions in the cardiovascular operating room. Anaesthesia 71:948–954PubMed
17.
Sutton E, Youssef Y, Meenaghan N, Godinez C, Xiao Y, Lee T, Dexter D, Park A (2010) Gaze disruptions experienced by the laparoscopic operating surgeon. Surg Endosc 24:1240–1244PubMed
18.
Pilke EM (2004) Flow experiences in information technology use. Int J Hum Comput Stud 61:347–357
19.
Al-Hakim L, Xiao J, Sengupta S (2017) Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery. Surg Endosc 31(12):5043–5056PubMed
20.
Tollner AM, Riley MA, Matthews G, Shockley KD (2005) Divided attention during adaptation to visual-motor rotation in an endoscopic surgery simulator. Cognit Technol Work 7:6–13
21.
Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494PubMed
22.
Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD (2003) A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg 138:967–970PubMed
23.
Pluyter JR, Buzink SN, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowicz JJ (2010) Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc 24:902–907PubMed
24.
Shambo L, Umadhay T, Pedoto A (2015) Music in the operating room: is it a safety hazard? AANA J 83:44–48
25.
Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 320:745–749PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Weenk M, Alken APB, Engelen LJLPG, Bredie SJH, van de Belt TH, van Goor H (2017) Stress measurement in surgeons and residents using a smart patch. Am J Surg 216(2):361–368PubMed
27.
Hassan I, Weyers P, Maschuw K, Dick B, Gerdes B, Rothmund M, Zielke A (2006) Negative stress-coping strategies among novices in surgery correlate with poor virtual laparoscopic performance. Br J Surg 93(12):1554–1559PubMed
28.
Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 147(3):318–330PubMed
29.
Liden CB, Wolowicz M, Stivoric J, Teller A, Vishnubhatla S, Pelletier R, Farringdon J (2002) Accuracy and reliability of the SenseWear™ armband as an energy expenditure assessment device. BodyMedia Inc., Pittsburgh, pp 1–15
30.
Pluyter JR, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowicz JJ (2014) Immersive training: bREAKING the bubble and measuring the heat. Surg Endosc 28:1545–1554PubMed
31.
Dawson ME, Schell AM, Filion DL (2007) The electrodermal system. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 159–181
32.
Pecchinenda A, Smith CA (1996) The affective significance of skin conductance activity during a difficult problem-solving task. Cognit Emot 10:481–503
33.
Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 101: data presentation. Singap Med J 44(6):280–285
34.
Hettmansperger TP, McKean JW (1998) Robust nonparametric statistical methods. Kendall’s Library of Statistics. Wiley, London
35.
Levine S (2005) Developmental determinants of sensitivity and resistance to stress. J Psychoneuroendocrinol 30:939–946
36.
Schijven MP, Bemelman WA (2011) Problems and pitfalls in modern competency-based laparoscopic training. Surg Endosc 25:2159–2163PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IAMJ, Tseng LNL (2005) The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course: improving operating room performance using virtual reality training trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 19:1220–1226PubMed
38.
Gallagher AG, Leonard G, Traynor OJ (2009) Role and feasibility of psychomotor and dexterity testing in selection for surgical training. ANZ J Surg 79:108–113PubMed
39.
Hagiwara MA, Backlund P, Söderholm HM, Lundberg L, Lebram M, Engström H (2016) Measuring participants’ immersion in healthcare simulation: the development of an instrument. Adv Simul 1:1–9
40.
Backlund P, Söderholm HM, Engström H, Hagiwara MA, Lebram M (2018) Breaking out of the bubble putting simulation into context to increase immersion and performance. Simul Gaming 49:642–660
41.
Undre S, Koutantji M, Sevdalis N, Gautama S, Selvapatt N, Williams S, Sains P, McCulloch P, Darzi A, Vincent C (2007) Multidisciplinary crisis simulations: the way forward for training surgical teams. World J Surg 31:1843–1853PubMed
42.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 139:140–149PubMed
43.
Flin R, O’Connor P, Mearns K (2006) Crew resource management: improving team work in high reliability industries. Team Perform Manag 8:68–78
Metadata
Title
Effects of surgical flow disruptions on surgeons’ resources: a pilot study
Authors
B. C. G. van Houwelingen
A.-F. Rutkowski
S. Ganni
P. S. Stepaniak
J. J. Jakimowicz
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07239-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A comprehensive study comparing tack and glue mesh fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for adult groin hernias

OriginalPaper

Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2019 SAGES Oral

Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer

OriginalPaper

Subtotal cholecystectomy: early and long-term outcomes

2019 SAGES Oral

Anatomical characteristics and classifications of gastrocolic trunk of Henle in laparoscopic right colectomy: preliminary results of multicenter observational study

OriginalPaper

Doing more with less: our decade of experience with laparo-endoscopic single site Heller myotomy supports its application