Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020 | Rectal Cancer | 2019 SAGES Oral

Short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic rectal surgery—from the real word data of 1145 consecutive cases in China

Authors: Wenju Chang, Ye Wei, Li Ren, Mi Jian, Yijiao Chen, Jingwen Chen, Tianyu Liu, Wenbai Huang, Shangjin Peng, Jianmin Xu

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to a limited patient sample size, substantial data on robotic rectal resection (RRR) is lacking. Here, we reported a large consecutive cases from the real word data to assess the safety and efficacy of RRR.

Methods

From September 2010 to June 2017, a total of 1145 consecutive RRR procedures were performed in patients with stage I–IV disease. We conducted an analysis based on information from a prospectively designed database to evaluate surgical outcomes, urogenital function, and long-term oncological outcomes.

Results

Of three types of RRR performed, 227 (24.2%) were abdominoperineal resections, 865 (75.5%) were anterior resections, and 3 (0.3%) were Hartmann. Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 5.9% of patients. The overall positive circumferential margin rate was 1.3%. Surgical complication rate and mortality were 16.2% and 0.8% within 30 days of surgery, respectively. Mean hospital stay after surgery and hospital cost were 6.3 ± 2.9 days and 10442.5 ± 3321.5 US dollars, respectively. Risk factors for surgical complications included male gender, tumor location (mid-low rectum), combined organ resection, and clinical T category (cT3–4). Urinary function and general sexual satisfaction decreased significantly 1 month after surgery for both sexes. Subsequently, both parameters increased progressively, and the values 1 year after surgery were comparable to those measured before surgery. At a median follow-up of 34.6 months, local recurrence and distant metastases occurred in 2.3% and 21.1% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Robotic rectal resection was safe with preserved urogenital function and arrived equivalent oncological outcomes in a nonselected group of patients with rectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J (2015) Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 262(6):1040–1045PubMedCrossRef Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J (2015) Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg 262(6):1040–1045PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martinez-Perez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N (2017) Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 23(44):7906–7916PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martinez-Perez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N (2017) Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 23(44):7906–7916PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A, Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Gurrado A, Strippoli GFM (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 267(6):1034–1046PubMedCrossRef Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A, Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Gurrado A, Strippoli GFM (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 267(6):1034–1046PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A (2010) Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251(5):882–886PubMedCrossRef Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A (2010) Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251(5):882–886PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eftaiha SM, Pai A, Sulo S, Park JJ, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ (2016) Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 59(7):607–614PubMedCrossRef Eftaiha SM, Pai A, Sulo S, Park JJ, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ (2016) Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 59(7):607–614PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318(16):1569–1580PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lim DR, Bae SU, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2017) Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Surg Endosc 31(4):1728–1737PubMedCrossRef Lim DR, Bae SU, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2017) Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Surg Endosc 31(4):1728–1737PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218PubMedCrossRef van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group COcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jones OM, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (2009) Preservation of sexual and bladder function after laparoscopic rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 11(5):489–495PubMedCrossRef Jones OM, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (2009) Preservation of sexual and bladder function after laparoscopic rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 11(5):489–495PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678PubMedCrossRef Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sammour T, Malakorn S, Bednarski BK, Kaur H, Shin US, Messick C, You YN, Chang GJ (2018) Oncological outcomes after robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: analysis of a prospective database. Ann Surg 267:521–526PubMedCrossRef Sammour T, Malakorn S, Bednarski BK, Kaur H, Shin US, Messick C, You YN, Chang GJ (2018) Oncological outcomes after robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: analysis of a prospective database. Ann Surg 267:521–526PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89(3):327–334PubMedCrossRef Wibe A, Rendedal PR, Svensson E, Norstein J, Eide TJ, Myrvold HE, Soreide O (2002) Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 89(3):327–334PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Quirke P (2003) Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncol 4(11):695–702PubMedCrossRef Quirke P (2003) Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncol 4(11):695–702PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mazeh H, Samet Y, Abu-Wasel B, Beglaibter N, Grinbaum R, Cohen T, Pinto M, Hamburger T, Freund HR, Nissan A (2009) Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):355–361PubMedCrossRef Mazeh H, Samet Y, Abu-Wasel B, Beglaibter N, Grinbaum R, Cohen T, Pinto M, Hamburger T, Freund HR, Nissan A (2009) Application of a novel severity grading system for surgical complications after colorectal resection. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):355–361PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, Board IA (2006) The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):1063–1066 (discussion 1066) PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J, Board IA (2006) The International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):1063–1066 (discussion 1066) PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830PubMedCrossRef Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49(6):822–830PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208PubMedCrossRef Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Collettini F, Enders J, Stephan C, Fischer T, Baur ADJ, Penzkofer T, Busch J, Hamm B, Gebauer B (2019) Image-guided irreversible electroporation of localized prostate cancer: functional and oncologic outcomes. Radiology 292(1):250–257PubMedCrossRef Collettini F, Enders J, Stephan C, Fischer T, Baur ADJ, Penzkofer T, Busch J, Hamm B, Gebauer B (2019) Image-guided irreversible electroporation of localized prostate cancer: functional and oncologic outcomes. Radiology 292(1):250–257PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Saito S, Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Akazai Y, Ota M, Ohue M, Komori K, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Akasu T, Moriya Y, Colorectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology, Group (2016) Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: results of a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for patients with lower rectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0212. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(12):1851–1858PubMedCrossRef Saito S, Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, Saito N, Kinugasa Y, Akazai Y, Ota M, Ohue M, Komori K, Shiozawa M, Yamaguchi T, Akasu T, Moriya Y, Colorectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology, Group (2016) Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: results of a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for patients with lower rectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0212. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(12):1851–1858PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(6):1125–1130PubMedCrossRef Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE (2016) A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(6):1125–1130PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xu JM, Wei Y, Wang XY, Fan H, Chang WJ, Ren L, Jiang W, Fan J, Qin XY (2015) Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. World J Gastroenterol 21(9):2848–2853PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xu JM, Wei Y, Wang XY, Fan H, Chang WJ, Ren L, Jiang W, Fan J, Qin XY (2015) Robot-assisted one-stage resection of rectal cancer with liver and lung metastases. World J Gastroenterol 21(9):2848–2853PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Asa Z, Greenberg R, Ghinea R, Inbar R, Wasserberg N, Avital S (2013) Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(10):3748–3753PubMedCrossRef Asa Z, Greenberg R, Ghinea R, Inbar R, Wasserberg N, Avital S (2013) Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 27(10):3748–3753PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261(1):129–137PubMedCrossRef Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261(1):129–137PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Manilich E, Vogel JD, Kiran RP, Church JM, Seyidova-Khoshknabi D, Remzi FH (2013) Key factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56(1):64–71PubMedCrossRef Manilich E, Vogel JD, Kiran RP, Church JM, Seyidova-Khoshknabi D, Remzi FH (2013) Key factors associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 56(1):64–71PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Asari SA, Cho MS, Kim NK (2015) Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(2):175–185PubMedCrossRef Asari SA, Cho MS, Kim NK (2015) Safe anastomosis in laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a narrative review and outcomes study from an expert tertiary center. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(2):175–185PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148(1):65–71PubMedCrossRef Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148(1):65–71PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yang CS, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Choi JI, Han KS (2016) Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 18(12):O445–O452PubMedCrossRef Yang CS, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Choi JI, Han KS (2016) Rectal tube drainage reduces major anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 18(12):O445–O452PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257(1):95–101PubMedCrossRef Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison–open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257(1):95–101PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E (2014) Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 101(10):1272–1279PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angeras U, Cuesta MA, Jess P, Rosenberg J, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E (2014) Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 101(10):1272–1279PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332PubMedCrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS, Bae SU, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy. Surg Endosc 29(6):1419–1424PubMedCrossRef Baek SJ, Kim CH, Cho MS, Bae SU, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy. Surg Endosc 29(6):1419–1424PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic rectal surgery—from the real word data of 1145 consecutive cases in China
Authors
Wenju Chang
Ye Wei
Li Ren
Mi Jian
Yijiao Chen
Jingwen Chen
Tianyu Liu
Wenbai Huang
Shangjin Peng
Jianmin Xu
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07170-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Go to the issue