Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020

Open Access 01-05-2020 | Esophagography

Candy cane revision after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Authors: Anna Kamocka, Emma Rose McGlone, Belén Pérez-Pevida, Krishna Moorthy, Sherif Hakky, Christos Tsironis, Harvinder Chahal, Alexander Dimitri Miras, Tricia Tan, Sanjay Purkayastha, Ahmed Rashid Ahmed

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An excessively long-blind end of the alimentary limb following a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), known as a ‘candy cane’ (CC), may cause symptoms including abdominal pain, regurgitation and vomiting. Very few studies have examined the efficacy of surgical resection of the CC.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess sensitivity of preoperative diagnostic tools for CC, as well as perioperative outcomes and symptom resolution after CC revision surgery.

Setting

High volume bariatric centre of excellence, United Kingdom.

Methods

Observational study of CC revisions from 2010 to 2017.

Results

Twenty-eight CC revision cases were identified (mean age 45 ± 9 years, female preponderance 9:1). Presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (86%), regurgitation/vomiting (43%), suboptimal weight loss (36%) and acid reflux (21%). Preoperative tests provided correct diagnosis in 63% of barium contrast swallows, 50% of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies and 29% computed tomographies. Patients presenting with pain had significantly higher CC size as compared with pain-free group (4.2 vs. 2 cm, p = 0.001). Perioperative complications occurred in 25% of cases. Complete or partial symptom resolution was documented in 73% of patients undergoing CC revision. Highest success rates were recorded in the regurgitation/vomiting group (67%).

Conclusion

Surgical revision of CC is associated with good symptom resolution in the majority of patients, especially those presenting with regurgitation/vomiting. However, it carries certain risk of complications. CC diagnosis may frequently be missed; hence more than one diagnostic tool should be considered when investigating symptomatic patients after RYGB.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Miras AD, Kamocka A, Patel D, Dexter S, Finlay I, Hopkins JC et al (2018) Obesity surgery makes patients healthier and more functional: real world results from the United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(7):1033–1040CrossRef Miras AD, Kamocka A, Patel D, Dexter S, Finlay I, Hopkins JC et al (2018) Obesity surgery makes patients healthier and more functional: real world results from the United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(7):1033–1040CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sjostrom L, Gummesson A, Sjostrom CD, Narbro K, Peltonen M, Wedel H et al (2009) Effects of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence in obese patients in Sweden (Swedish Obese Subjects Study): a prospective, controlled intervention trial. Lancet Oncol 10(7):653–662CrossRef Sjostrom L, Gummesson A, Sjostrom CD, Narbro K, Peltonen M, Wedel H et al (2009) Effects of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence in obese patients in Sweden (Swedish Obese Subjects Study): a prospective, controlled intervention trial. Lancet Oncol 10(7):653–662CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greenstein AJ, O’Rourke RW (2011) Abdominal pain after gastric bypass: suspects and solutions. Am J Surg 201(6):819–827CrossRef Greenstein AJ, O’Rourke RW (2011) Abdominal pain after gastric bypass: suspects and solutions. Am J Surg 201(6):819–827CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dallal RM, Cottam D (2007) “Candy cane” Roux syndrome—a possible complication after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(3):408–410CrossRef Dallal RM, Cottam D (2007) “Candy cane” Roux syndrome—a possible complication after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(3):408–410CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aryaie AH, Fayezizadeh M, Wen Y, Alshehri M, Abbas M, Khaitan L (2017) “Candy cane syndrome:” an underappreciated cause of abdominal pain and nausea after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(9):1501–1505CrossRef Aryaie AH, Fayezizadeh M, Wen Y, Alshehri M, Abbas M, Khaitan L (2017) “Candy cane syndrome:” an underappreciated cause of abdominal pain and nausea after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(9):1501–1505CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Romero-Mejía C, Camacho-Aguilera JF, Paipilla-Monroy O (2010) “Candy cane” Roux syndrome in laparoscopic gastric by-pass. Cir Cir 78(4):347PubMed Romero-Mejía C, Camacho-Aguilera JF, Paipilla-Monroy O (2010) “Candy cane” Roux syndrome in laparoscopic gastric by-pass. Cir Cir 78(4):347PubMed
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mandrekar JN (2010) Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 5(9):1315–1316CrossRef Mandrekar JN (2010) Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol 5(9):1315–1316CrossRef
13.
go back to reference English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM (2018) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(3):259–263CrossRef English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, Mattar SG, Rosenthal RJ, Morton JM (2018) American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(3):259–263CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai C-C, Hung K-C, Chang P-C, Huang C-K (2015) Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(3):612–620CrossRef Vij A, Malapan K, Tsai C-C, Hung K-C, Chang P-C, Huang C-K (2015) Worthy or not? Six-year experience of revisional bariatric surgery from an Asian center of excellence. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(3):612–620CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brolin RE (2005) Long limb Roux en Y gastric bypass revisited. Surg Clin N Am 85(4):807–817CrossRef Brolin RE (2005) Long limb Roux en Y gastric bypass revisited. Surg Clin N Am 85(4):807–817CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C (2017) A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg 60(3):205CrossRef Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C (2017) A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg 60(3):205CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Candy cane revision after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Authors
Anna Kamocka
Emma Rose McGlone
Belén Pérez-Pevida
Krishna Moorthy
Sherif Hakky
Christos Tsironis
Harvinder Chahal
Alexander Dimitri Miras
Tricia Tan
Sanjay Purkayastha
Ahmed Rashid Ahmed
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06988-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2020 Go to the issue