Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Endoscopy | 2019 SAGES Oral

Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni

Authors: Joshua J. Weis, Adnan A. Alseidi, D. Rohan Jeyarajah, Michael A. Schweitzer, Yumi Hori, Vanessa Cheung, Daniel J. Scott

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The Fellowship Council (FC) oversees 172 non-ACGME surgical fellowships offering 211 fellowship positions per year. These training programs cover multiple specialties including Advanced gastrointestinal (GI), Advanced GI/MIS, Bariatric, Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB), Flexible Endoscopy, Colorectal, and Thoracic Surgery. Although some data have been published detailing the practice environments (i.e., urban vs. rural) and yearly total case volumes of FC alumni, there is a lack of granular data regarding the practice patterns of FC graduates. The aim of this study was to gather detailed data on the specific case types performed and surgical approaches employed by recent FC alumni.

Methods

A 21-item survey covering 64 data points was emailed to 835 FC alumni who completed their fellowship between 2013 and 2017. Email addresses were obtained from FC program directors and FC archives.

Results

We received 327 responses (39% response rate). HPB, Advanced Colorectal, and Advanced Thoracic alumni appear to establish practices focused on their respective fields. Graduates from Advanced GI, Adv GI/MIS, and Bariatric programs appear to build practices with a mix of several complex GI case types including bariatrics, colorectal, foregut, HPB, and hernia cases.

Conclusions

This is the first large data set to provide granular information on the practice patterns of FC alumni. FC trained surgeons perform impressive volumes of complex procedures, and minimally invasive approaches are extremely prevalent in these practices. Further, many graduates carve out practices with large footprints in robotics and endoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Swanstrom LL, Park A, Arregui M, Franklin M, Smith CD, Blaney C (2006) Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships. Ann Surg 243(4):431–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Swanstrom LL, Park A, Arregui M, Franklin M, Smith CD, Blaney C (2006) Bringing order to the chaos: developing a matching process for minimally invasive and gastrointestinal postgraduate fellowships. Ann Surg 243(4):431–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference McBride CL, Rosenthal RJ, Brethauer S et al (2017) Constructing a competency-based bariatric surgery fellowship training curriculum. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(3):437–441CrossRefPubMed McBride CL, Rosenthal RJ, Brethauer S et al (2017) Constructing a competency-based bariatric surgery fellowship training curriculum. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(3):437–441CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Weis JJ, Goldblatt M, Pryor A et al (2018) SAGES’s advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project. Surg Endosc 32:2613–2619CrossRefPubMed Weis JJ, Goldblatt M, Pryor A et al (2018) SAGES’s advanced GI/MIS fellowship curriculum pilot project. Surg Endosc 32:2613–2619CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Park AE, Sutton ER, Heniford BT (2015) Minimally invasive surgery fellowship graduates: their demographics, practice patterns, and contributions. Surgery 158(6):1462–1467CrossRefPubMed Park AE, Sutton ER, Heniford BT (2015) Minimally invasive surgery fellowship graduates: their demographics, practice patterns, and contributions. Surgery 158(6):1462–1467CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Banka G, Woodard G, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton JM (2012) Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass surgery: differences in patient demographics, safety, and outcomes. Arch Surg 147(6):550–556CrossRefPubMed Banka G, Woodard G, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton JM (2012) Laparoscopic vs open gastric bypass surgery: differences in patient demographics, safety, and outcomes. Arch Surg 147(6):550–556CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Benlice C, Aytac E, Costedio M et al (2017) Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1783CrossRef Benlice C, Aytac E, Costedio M et al (2017) Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Int J Med Robot 13(3):e1783CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hakanson BS, Thor KB, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O (2007) Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21(2):289–298CrossRefPubMed Hakanson BS, Thor KB, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O (2007) Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21(2):289–298CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN et al (2015) Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: insights from the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. World J Gastroenterol 21(45):12843–12850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN et al (2015) Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: insights from the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. World J Gastroenterol 21(45):12843–12850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129(4):390–400CrossRefPubMed Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP et al (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129(4):390–400CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, Marin P, Torralba JA, Garcia-Ayllon J (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Arch Surg 133(2):173–175CrossRefPubMed Lujan JA, Parrilla P, Robles R, Marin P, Torralba JA, Garcia-Ayllon J (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. Arch Surg 133(2):173–175CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185CrossRefPubMed Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Khoshhal Z, Canner J, Schneider E et al (2017) Impact of surgeon specialty on perioperative outcomes of surgery for benign esophageal diseases: a NSQIP analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol A 27(9):924–930CrossRef Khoshhal Z, Canner J, Schneider E et al (2017) Impact of surgeon specialty on perioperative outcomes of surgery for benign esophageal diseases: a NSQIP analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol A 27(9):924–930CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kubasiak JC, Landin M, Schimpke S et al (2017) The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc 31(6):2661–2666CrossRefPubMed Kubasiak JC, Landin M, Schimpke S et al (2017) The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc 31(6):2661–2666CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Landin M, Kubasiak JC, Schimpke S et al (2017) The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc 31(2):917–921CrossRefPubMed Landin M, Kubasiak JC, Schimpke S et al (2017) The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc 31(2):917–921CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zheng Z, Jemal A, Lin CC, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(3):491CrossRef Zheng Z, Jemal A, Lin CC, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(3):491CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ (2012) Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg 29(5):374–383CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ (2012) Centralization of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Dig Surg 29(5):374–383CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference La Torre M, Nigri G, Ferrari L, Cosenza G, Ravaioli M, Ramacciato G (2012) Hospital volume, margin status, and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 78(2):225–229PubMed La Torre M, Nigri G, Ferrari L, Cosenza G, Ravaioli M, Ramacciato G (2012) Hospital volume, margin status, and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 78(2):225–229PubMed
Metadata
Title
Providing complex GI surgical care with minimally invasive approaches: a survey of the practice patterns of Fellowship Council alumni
Authors
Joshua J. Weis
Adnan A. Alseidi
D. Rohan Jeyarajah
Michael A. Schweitzer
Yumi Hori
Vanessa Cheung
Daniel J. Scott
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06929-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020 Go to the issue