Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Sleeve Gastrectomy

Trocar site closure with a novel anchor-based (neoClose®) system versus standard suture closure: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Authors: Pouya Iranmanesh, Angielyn R. Rivera, Kulvinder S. Bajwa, Mustafa Alibhai, Brad E. Snyder, Todd D. Wilson, Melissa M. Felinski, Sheilendra S. Mehta, Kavita D. Chandwani, Connie L. Klein, Peter A. Walker, Shinil K. Shah, Erik B. Wilson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with obesity have a higher risk of trocar site hernia. The objective of the present study was to compare a standard suture passer versus the neoClose® device for port site fascial closure in patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Methods

This is a randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms. Thirty five patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 and undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were randomized to each group. Port site fascial closure for trocars ≥ 10 mm was performed with the neoClose® device in the study group and the standard suture passer in the control group. Primary outcomes were time required to complete closure and intensity of postoperative pain at the fascial closure sites. Secondary outcomes were intraabdominal needle depth and incidence of trocar site hernia.

Results

The use of the neoClose® device resulted in shorter closure times (20.2 vs 30.0 s, p = 0.0002), less pain (0.3 vs 0.9, p = 0.002) at port closure sites, and decreased needle depth (3.3 cm vs 5.2 cm, p < 0.0001) compared to the standard suture passer. There was no trocar site hernia at the one-year follow-up in either group.

Conclusions

Use of the neoClose® device resulted in faster fascial closure times, decreased intraoperative needle depth, and decreased postoperative abdominal pain at 1 week as compared to the standard suture passer. These data need to be confirmed on larger cohorts of patients with longer follow-up.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Janes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia S (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5 CrossRefPubMed Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Janes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia S (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19(1):1–24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10029-014-1342-5 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Walker PAS SK, Wilson EB (2016) Preclinical study evaluating a novel trocar site closure system. Open Access Surg 9:29–35CrossRef Walker PAS SK, Wilson EB (2016) Preclinical study evaluating a novel trocar site closure system. Open Access Surg 9:29–35CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shah SK, Walker PA, Snyder BE, Wilson EB (2015) Essentials and future directions of robotic bariatric surgery. In: Kroh MCS (ed) Essentials of robotic surgery. Springer, Switzerland, pp 73–80CrossRef Shah SK, Walker PA, Snyder BE, Wilson EB (2015) Essentials and future directions of robotic bariatric surgery. In: Kroh MCS (ed) Essentials of robotic surgery. Springer, Switzerland, pp 73–80CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Trocar site closure with a novel anchor-based (neoClose®) system versus standard suture closure: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Authors
Pouya Iranmanesh
Angielyn R. Rivera
Kulvinder S. Bajwa
Mustafa Alibhai
Brad E. Snyder
Todd D. Wilson
Melissa M. Felinski
Sheilendra S. Mehta
Kavita D. Chandwani
Connie L. Klein
Peter A. Walker
Shinil K. Shah
Erik B. Wilson
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06891-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Go to the issue