Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

Open Access 01-03-2020 | Endoscopy

Effectiveness of the HoloLens mixed-reality headset in minimally invasive surgery: a simulation-based feasibility study

Authors: Hasaneen Fathy Al Janabi, Abdullatif Aydin, Sharanya Palaneer, Nicola Macchione, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The advent of Virtual Reality technologies presents new opportunities for enhancing current surgical practice. Studies suggest that current techniques in endoscopic surgery are prone to disturbance of a surgeon’s visual-motor axis, influencing performance, ergonomics and iatrogenic injury rates. The Microsoft® HoloLens is a novel head-mounted display that has not been explored within surgical innovation research. This study aims to evaluate the HoloLens as a potential alternative to conventional monitors in endoscopic surgery.

Materials and methods

This prospective, observational and comparative study recruited 72 participants consisting of novices (n = 28), intermediate-level (n = 24) and experts (n = 20). Participants performed ureteroscopy, within an inflatable operating environment, using a validated training model and the HoloLens mixed-reality device as a monitor. Novices also completed the assigned task using conventional monitors; whilst the experienced groups did not, due to their extensive familiarity. Outcome measures were procedural completion time and performance evaluation (OSATS) score. A final evaluation survey was distributed amongst all participants.

Results

The HoloLens facilitated improved outcomes for procedural times (absolute difference, − 73 s; 95% CI − 115 to − 30; P = 0.0011) and OSAT scores (absolute difference, 4.1 points; 95% CI 2.9–5.3; P < 0.0001) compared to conventional monitors. Feedback evaluation demonstrated 97% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the HoloLens will have a role in surgical education (mean rating, 4.6 of 5; 95% CI 4.5–4.8). Furthermore, 95% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the HoloLens is feasible to introduce clinically and will have a role within surgery (mean rating, 4.4 of 5; 95% CI 4.2–4.5).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the device facilitated improved outcomes of performance in novices and was widely accepted as a surgical visual aid by all groups. The HoloLens represents a feasible alternative to the conventional setup, possibly by aligning the surgeon’s visual-motor axis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 77(12):1321–1329 Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 77(12):1321–1329
2.
go back to reference El Shallaly G, Cuschieri A (2006) Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 20(12):1879–1882CrossRef El Shallaly G, Cuschieri A (2006) Optimum view distance for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 20(12):1879–1882CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Iqbal MH et al (2016) The effectiveness of Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in surgery: A simulation study. Int J Surg 36:293–297PubMedCrossRef Iqbal MH et al (2016) The effectiveness of Google GLASS as a vital signs monitor in surgery: A simulation study. Int J Surg 36:293–297PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kihara K et al (2012) New three-dimensional head-mounted display system, TMDU-S-3D system, for minimally invasive surgery application: Procedures for gasless single-port radical nephrectomy. Int J Urol 19(9):886–889PubMedCrossRef Kihara K et al (2012) New three-dimensional head-mounted display system, TMDU-S-3D system, for minimally invasive surgery application: Procedures for gasless single-port radical nephrectomy. Int J Urol 19(9):886–889PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Koesveld JJM, Tetteroo GWM, Graaf EJR (2003) Use of head-mounted display in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 17(6):943–946CrossRef Koesveld JJM, Tetteroo GWM, Graaf EJR (2003) Use of head-mounted display in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 17(6):943–946CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Levy ML et al (1998) Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 43(2):392–395PubMedCrossRef Levy ML et al (1998) Stereoscopic head-mounted display incorporated into microsurgical procedures: technical note. Neurosurgery 43(2):392–395PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maithel SK et al (2005) Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 19(3):406–411PubMedCrossRef Maithel SK et al (2005) Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue. Surg Endosc 19(3):406–411PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Prendergast CJ et al (2009) Surgical performance with head-mounted displays in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19(s1):s237–s240CrossRef Prendergast CJ et al (2009) Surgical performance with head-mounted displays in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19(s1):s237–s240CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schier F, Beyerlein S, Gauderer M (2002) Imaging for endoscopic surgery: new developments applicable to pediatric surgical interventions. Pediatr Surg Int 18(5):459–462PubMed Schier F, Beyerlein S, Gauderer M (2002) Imaging for endoscopic surgery: new developments applicable to pediatric surgical interventions. Pediatr Surg Int 18(5):459–462PubMed
11.
go back to reference Yoshida S et al (2015) Head-mounted display for a personal integrated image monitoring system: ureteral stent placement. Urol Int 94(1):117–120PubMedCrossRef Yoshida S et al (2015) Head-mounted display for a personal integrated image monitoring system: ureteral stent placement. Urol Int 94(1):117–120PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Aydin A et al (2016) Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review. J Urol 196(2):312–320PubMedCrossRef Aydin A et al (2016) Current status of simulation and training models in urological surgery: a systematic review. J Urol 196(2):312–320PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kneebone R et al (2010) Distributed simulation—accessible immersive training. Med Teach 32(1):65–70PubMedCrossRef Kneebone R et al (2010) Distributed simulation—accessible immersive training. Med Teach 32(1):65–70PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brunckhorst O et al (2015) Simulation-based ureteroscopy skills training curriculum with integration of technical and non-technical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 29:2728–2735PubMedCrossRef Brunckhorst O et al (2015) Simulation-based ureteroscopy skills training curriculum with integration of technical and non-technical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 29:2728–2735PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference van Det MJ et al (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23(6):1279–1285PubMedCrossRef van Det MJ et al (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23(6):1279–1285PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wauben LSGL et al (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 20(8):1268–1274CrossRef Wauben LSGL et al (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc Other Interv Techn 20(8):1268–1274CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of the HoloLens mixed-reality headset in minimally invasive surgery: a simulation-based feasibility study
Authors
Hasaneen Fathy Al Janabi
Abdullatif Aydin
Sharanya Palaneer
Nicola Macchione
Ahmed Al-Jabir
Muhammad Shamim Khan
Prokar Dasgupta
Kamran Ahmed
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06862-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Go to the issue