Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Minimally Invasive Surgery | New Technology

Novel clip applicator for minimally invasive surgery

Authors: Simon Erridge, Christopher J. Payne, Mikael Sodergren

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ligation clips are used ubiquitously throughout minimally invasive surgery for apposition of tissues. Their size limits their application beyond ligation of small tubular structures. A novel clip and clip applicator that allows for broad-area clamping and rotation has been developed by our team. The primary aim of this study is to provide preliminary data assessing tensile strength of the clip across apposed segments of bowel.

Methods

A comparative study evaluating the maximum load (N) held across two apposed tissues by (a) our novel broad-area clip and (b) a conventional commercial clip was performed. Two sections of porcine bowel were clamped together and the maximum load (N) was measured using a tensile strength material testing machine. A preliminary experiment comparing staple line leak pressures in a porcine model ± clip enforcement of staple line was also conducted. p < 0.05 determined statistical significance.

Results

Twenty-four samples (intervention = 15; control = 9) of porcine bowel annealed by surgical clips were tested. The mean maximum force withheld by the bowel and staples was greater for our novel clip design (2.043 ± 0.831 N) than the control clip (1.080 ± 0.466 N, p = 0.004). Ten staple line (intervention = 5; control = 5) pressures of porcine bowel were measured. There was no statistically significant difference between the leak pressures with clip reinforcement (84.8 mmHg; range 71.8–109.8 mmHg), or without (54.1 mmHg; range 26.3–98.9 mmHg).

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that our novel clip is able to withstand higher tensile force across tissues compared to a leading commercial clip. A small preliminary trial of effect on leak pressures demonstrated no statistical significance; however, increasing reliability of staple line deformation may be a clinically important finding. Whilst further iteration of product design and clinical testing is required, this product may occupy an important clinical niche through staple line reinforcement, enterotomy closure and other applications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wood EC (1968) Hemostatic clip. Patent 3,363,628 Wood EC (1968) Hemostatic clip. Patent 3,363,628
2.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, Krause KR et al (2013) The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 257(5):791–797CrossRefPubMed Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, Krause KR et al (2013) The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 257(5):791–797CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shikora SA, Mahoney CB (2015) Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25(7):1133–1141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shikora SA, Mahoney CB (2015) Clinical benefit of gastric staple line reinforcement (SLR) in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25(7):1133–1141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Wang Z, Dai X, Xie H, Feng J, Li Z, Lu Q (2016) The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 25:145–152CrossRefPubMed Wang Z, Dai X, Xie H, Feng J, Li Z, Lu Q (2016) The efficacy of staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 25:145–152CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, Huffman KM, Wolfe BM, Nguyen NT et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264(3):464–473CrossRefPubMed Berger ER, Clements RH, Morton JM, Huffman KM, Wolfe BM, Nguyen NT et al (2016) The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg 264(3):464–473CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli E, Dutot C, Mercier G, Nocca D (2016) Clinical and economic evaluation of absorbable staple line buttressing in sleeve gastrectomy in high-risk patients. Obes Surg 26(8):1710–1716CrossRefPubMed Gayrel X, Loureiro M, Skalli E, Dutot C, Mercier G, Nocca D (2016) Clinical and economic evaluation of absorbable staple line buttressing in sleeve gastrectomy in high-risk patients. Obes Surg 26(8):1710–1716CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Segalini E, Todero S, Botusan R, Novello M et al (2017) A novel technique for enterotomy closure in stapled laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 19(10):O372–O376CrossRefPubMed Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Segalini E, Todero S, Botusan R, Novello M et al (2017) A novel technique for enterotomy closure in stapled laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 19(10):O372–O376CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Desilets DJ (2017) Fundamentals of NOTES. In: Romanelli JR, Desilets DJ, Earle DB (eds) NOTES and endoluminal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 13–27CrossRef Desilets DJ (2017) Fundamentals of NOTES. In: Romanelli JR, Desilets DJ, Earle DB (eds) NOTES and endoluminal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 13–27CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK, IDEAL Group (2013) IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ 346:f3012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCulloch P, Cook JA, Altman DG, Heneghan C, Diener MK, IDEAL Group (2013) IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages. BMJ 346:f3012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M (2008) Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4(3):416–422CrossRefPubMed Mery CM, Shafi BM, Binyamin G, Morton JM, Gertner M (2008) Profiling surgical staplers: effect of staple height, buttress, and overlap on staple line failure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4(3):416–422CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2011) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 15(3):322–325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2011) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 15(3):322–325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Iossa A, Abdelgawad M, Watkins BM, Silecchia G (2016) Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401(6):757–766CrossRef Iossa A, Abdelgawad M, Watkins BM, Silecchia G (2016) Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: overview of pathogenesis and risk factors. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401(6):757–766CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Glaysher M, Khan OA, Mabvuure NT, Wan A, Reddy M, Vasilikostas G (2013) Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it affect clinical outcomes? Int J Surg 11(4):286–289CrossRefPubMed Glaysher M, Khan OA, Mabvuure NT, Wan A, Reddy M, Vasilikostas G (2013) Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it affect clinical outcomes? Int J Surg 11(4):286–289CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, Wachtel MS, Linos D, Frezza EE (2009) Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg 19(2):166–172CrossRefPubMed Chen B, Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayannis D, Wachtel MS, Linos D, Frezza EE (2009) Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg 19(2):166–172CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gold JP, Pulsinelli W, Winchester P, Brill PW, Jacewicz M, Isom OW (1989) Safety of metallic surgical clips in patients undergoing high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Thorac Surg 48(5):643–645CrossRefPubMed Gold JP, Pulsinelli W, Winchester P, Brill PW, Jacewicz M, Isom OW (1989) Safety of metallic surgical clips in patients undergoing high-field-strength magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Thorac Surg 48(5):643–645CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Iqbal A, Haider M, Stadlhuber RJ, Karu A, Corkill S, Filipi CJ (2008) A study of intragastric and intravesicular pressure changes during rest, coughing, weight lifting, retching, and vomiting. Surg Endosc 22(12):2571–2575CrossRefPubMed Iqbal A, Haider M, Stadlhuber RJ, Karu A, Corkill S, Filipi CJ (2008) A study of intragastric and intravesicular pressure changes during rest, coughing, weight lifting, retching, and vomiting. Surg Endosc 22(12):2571–2575CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kranke P, Eberhart LH (2011) Possibilities and limitations in the pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(11):758–765CrossRefPubMed Kranke P, Eberhart LH (2011) Possibilities and limitations in the pharmacological management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28(11):758–765CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kovac AL (2013) Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 73(14):1525–1547CrossRefPubMed Kovac AL (2013) Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 73(14):1525–1547CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Novel clip applicator for minimally invasive surgery
Authors
Simon Erridge
Christopher J. Payne
Mikael Sodergren
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06860-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2019 Go to the issue