Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2020

01-02-2020

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a cognitive task analysis framework toward training design

Authors: Sudeep Hegde, Mark A. Gromski, Tansel Halic, Melih Turkseven, Zhaohui Xia, Berk Çetinsaya, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Daniel B. Jones, Suvranu De, Cullen D. Jackson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the major impediments to the proliferation of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in Western countries is the lack of sufficient experts as instructors. One way to address this gap is to develop didactic systems, such as surgical simulators, to support the role of trainers. Cognitive task analysis (CTA) has been used in healthcare for the design and improvement of surgical training programs, and therefore can potentially be used for design of similar systems for ESD.

Objective

The aim of the study was to apply a CTA-based approach to identify the cognitive aspects of performing ESD, and to generate qualitative insights for training.

Materials and methods

Semi-structured interviews were designed based on the CTA framework to elicit knowledge of ESD practitioners relating to the various tasks involved in the procedure. Three observations were conducted of expert ESD trainers either while they performed actual ESD procedures or at a training workshop. Interviews were either conducted over the phone or in person. Interview participants included four experts and four novices. The observation notes and interviews were analyzed for emergent qualitative themes and relationships.

Results

The qualitative analysis yielded thematic insights related to four main cognition-related categories: learning goals/principles, challenges/concerns, strategies, and decision-making. The specific insights under each of these categories were systematically mapped to the various tasks inherent to the ESD procedure.

Conclusions

The CTA approach was applied to identify cognitive themes related to ESD procedural tasks. Insights developed based on the qualitative analysis of interviews and observations of ESD practitioners can be used to inform the design of ESD training systems, such as virtual reality-based simulators.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Yamamoto H, Hirobumi K, Tomizo Y, Norio I, Yukihiro S, Yutaka S, Toshihiko H, Kenji U, Kenichi I, Kentaro S (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto H, Hirobumi K, Tomizo Y, Norio I, Yukihiro S, Yutaka S, Toshihiko H, Kenji U, Kenichi I, Kentaro S (1999) A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium. Gastrointest Endosc 50:701–704CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T, Miyata Y, Takahashi A, Kitamura Y, Tomori A (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306CrossRefPubMed Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T, Miyata Y, Takahashi A, Kitamura Y, Tomori A (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu K-I, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8 CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu K-I, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-009-0562-8 CrossRefPubMed
14.
18.
go back to reference Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
19.
go back to reference Clark R, Pugh C, Yates K, Inaba K, Green D, Sullivan M (2012) The use of cognitive task analysis to improve instructional descriptions of procedures. J Surg Res 173:e37–e42CrossRefPubMed Clark R, Pugh C, Yates K, Inaba K, Green D, Sullivan M (2012) The use of cognitive task analysis to improve instructional descriptions of procedures. J Surg Res 173:e37–e42CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher S, McLaughlin M, Narayanan S, Piepol D (2004) Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:114–120PubMed Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher S, McLaughlin M, Narayanan S, Piepol D (2004) Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 98:114–120PubMed
28.
go back to reference Scientific Software Development, GmbH: Atlas.ti 7, Berlin, Germany Scientific Software Development, GmbH: Atlas.ti 7, Berlin, Germany
29.
go back to reference Ignatov V, Tonev A, Kolev N, Zlatarov A, Shterev S, Kirilova T, Ivanov K (2016) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon cancer. In: Colorectal Cancer—From Pathogenesis to Treatment. InTech Ignatov V, Tonev A, Kolev N, Zlatarov A, Shterev S, Kirilova T, Ivanov K (2016) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon cancer. In: Colorectal Cancer—From Pathogenesis to Treatment. InTech
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a cognitive task analysis framework toward training design
Authors
Sudeep Hegde
Mark A. Gromski
Tansel Halic
Melih Turkseven
Zhaohui Xia
Berk Çetinsaya
Mandeep S. Sawhney
Daniel B. Jones
Suvranu De
Cullen D. Jackson
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06822-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2020 Go to the issue