Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020

Open Access 01-01-2020 | Insulins

Clinical follow-up on weight loss, glycemic control, and safety aspects of 24 months of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner implantation

Authors: B. Betzel, M. I. Cooiman, E. O. Aarts, I. M. C. Janssen, P. J. Wahab, M. J. M. Groenen, J. P. H. Drenth, F. J. Berends

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device designed to induce weight loss and improve glycemic control. The liner is licensed for a maximum implant duration of 12 months. It might be hypothesized that extension of the dwelling time results in added value. The goals of our study were to determine weight change, change in glycemic control, and safety in patients with an intended 24 months of DJBL dwelling time.

Methods

Patients were initially selected for a 12-month implantation period. When no physical complaints or adverse events (AEs) occurred, motivated patients who responded well were selected for extension of dwelling time to 24 months. Patients underwent a control endoscopy 12 months after implantation and visited the out-patient clinic every 3 months up to explantation. Patients agreed to remove the DJBL when complaints or AEs occurred that could not be treated conservatively.

Results

Implantation was extended in 44 patients, and 24 (55%) patients completed the full 24 months. Twenty patients required early removal due to AEs. During dwelling time, body weight decreased significantly (15.9 kg; TBWL 14.6%). HbA1c decreased non-significantly (4.9 mmol/mol). The number of insulin users and daily dose of insulin both decreased significantly. At 24 months after removal, glycemic control had worsened, while body weight was still significantly lower compared to baseline. In total, 68% of the patients experienced at least one AE. Two patients developed a hepatic abscess.

Conclusions

DJBL treatment results in significant weight loss and improves glycemic control during implantation. The largest beneficial effects occur during the first 9–12 months after implantation. Extension of dwelling time to 24 months results only in stabilization of body weight and glycemic control. After explantation, weight improvements are maintained, but glycemic control worsens. As the cumulative risk of AEs increases with time, a maximal dwelling time of 12 months is advisable.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376(7):641–651CrossRef Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP et al (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376(7):641–651CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE et al (2017) Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med 377(12):1143–1155CrossRef Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE et al (2017) Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med 377(12):1143–1155CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jirapinyo P, Haas AV, Thompson CC (2018) Effect of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity: a meta-analysis with secondary analysis on weight loss and hormonal changes. Diabetes Care 41(5):1106–1115CrossRef Jirapinyo P, Haas AV, Thompson CC (2018) Effect of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity: a meta-analysis with secondary analysis on weight loss and hormonal changes. Diabetes Care 41(5):1106–1115CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Betzel B, Homan J, Aarts EO et al (2017) Weight reduction and improvement in diabetes by the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner: a 198 patient cohort study. Surg Endosc 31(7):2881–2891CrossRef Betzel B, Homan J, Aarts EO et al (2017) Weight reduction and improvement in diabetes by the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner: a 198 patient cohort study. Surg Endosc 31(7):2881–2891CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):446–454CrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):446–454CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Quezada N, Munoz R, Morelli C et al (2018) Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years. Surg Endosc 32(1):260–267CrossRef Quezada N, Munoz R, Morelli C et al (2018) Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner prototype in severe or morbidly obese subjects implanted for up to 3 years. Surg Endosc 32(1):260–267CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Betzel B, Koehestanie P, Homan J et al (2017) Changes in glycemic control and body weight after explantation of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):409–415CrossRef Betzel B, Koehestanie P, Homan J et al (2017) Changes in glycemic control and body weight after explantation of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner. Gastrointest Endosc 85(2):409–415CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vilarrasa N, de Gordejuela AG, Casajoana A et al (2017) Endobarrier(R) in grade I obese patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes: role of gastrointestinal hormones in glucose metabolism. Obes Surg 27(3):569–577CrossRef Vilarrasa N, de Gordejuela AG, Casajoana A et al (2017) Endobarrier(R) in grade I obese patients with long-standing type 2 diabetes: role of gastrointestinal hormones in glucose metabolism. Obes Surg 27(3):569–577CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Koehestanie P, Betzel B, Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Wahab P, Berends FJ (2015) Is reimplantation of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner feasible? Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(5):1099–1104CrossRef Koehestanie P, Betzel B, Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Wahab P, Berends FJ (2015) Is reimplantation of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner feasible? Surg Obes Relat Dis 11(5):1099–1104CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Imaz I, Martinez-Cervell C, Garcia-Alvarez EE, Sendra-Gutierrez JM, Gonzalez-Enriquez J (2008) Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis. Obes Surg 18(7):841–846CrossRef Imaz I, Martinez-Cervell C, Garcia-Alvarez EE, Sendra-Gutierrez JM, Gonzalez-Enriquez J (2008) Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis. Obes Surg 18(7):841–846CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Popov VB, Ou A, Schulman AR, Thompson CC (2017) The impact of intragastric balloons on obesity-related co-morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 112(3):429–439CrossRef Popov VB, Ou A, Schulman AR, Thompson CC (2017) The impact of intragastric balloons on obesity-related co-morbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 112(3):429–439CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Keren D, Rainis T (2018) Intragastric balloons for overweight populations-1 year post removal. Obes Surg 28(8):2368–2373CrossRef Keren D, Rainis T (2018) Intragastric balloons for overweight populations-1 year post removal. Obes Surg 28(8):2368–2373CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kalabin A, Mani VR, Dinesh A, Suman P, Ahmed L (2018) ReShape intragastric balloon complicated by gastric perforation and peritonitis. Obes Surg 28(7):2126–2129CrossRef Kalabin A, Mani VR, Dinesh A, Suman P, Ahmed L (2018) ReShape intragastric balloon complicated by gastric perforation and peritonitis. Obes Surg 28(7):2126–2129CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reed L, Edriss H, Nugent K (2018) Gastric ulceration and bleeding with hemodynamic instability caused by an intragastric balloon for weight loss. Clin Endosc 51(6):584CrossRef Reed L, Edriss H, Nugent K (2018) Gastric ulceration and bleeding with hemodynamic instability caused by an intragastric balloon for weight loss. Clin Endosc 51(6):584CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tate CM, Geliebter A (2018) Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: FDA safety updates. Adv Ther 35(1):1–4CrossRef Tate CM, Geliebter A (2018) Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: FDA safety updates. Adv Ther 35(1):1–4CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zechmeister-Koss I, Huic M, Fischer S (2014) The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg 24(2):310–323CrossRef Zechmeister-Koss I, Huic M, Fischer S (2014) The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or obesity: a systematic review. Obes Surg 24(2):310–323CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical follow-up on weight loss, glycemic control, and safety aspects of 24 months of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner implantation
Authors
B. Betzel
M. I. Cooiman
E. O. Aarts
I. M. C. Janssen
P. J. Wahab
M. J. M. Groenen
J. P. H. Drenth
F. J. Berends
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06752-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020 Go to the issue