Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2019

01-09-2019

Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)

Authors: Noelia Ibáñez, Jesús Abrisqueta, Juan Luján, Quiteria Hernández, María Dolores Rufete, Pascual Parrilla

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Right hemicolectomy is a very common surgery. Many studies compare different options for laparoscopic ileocolic anastomoses: intra- or extracorporeal; handsewn or stapled; side-to-side or end-to-side. However, there are no studies about the influence that peristalsis could have on this anastomosis. The aim of this study is to compare safety and feasibility of isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. The secondary endpoint is to compare long-term functional outcomes (chronic diarrhoea) and quality of life (GIQLI questionnaire) after a 1-year follow-up period.

Methods

A double-blind, randomised, prospective trial in patients undergoing scheduled surgery for right colon cancer with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and isoperistaltic (ISO) or antiperistaltic (ANTI) ileocolic anastomoses.

Results

Hundred and eight patients were included in the study. Patients were randomised either to isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic configuration (54 ISO/ANTI). No significant differences in baseline variables were found. No differences in surgical time (130 [120–150] min ISO vs. 140 [127–160] ANTI, p = 0.481), nor in anastomotic time (19 [17–22] vs. 20 [16–25], p = 0.207) and nor in postoperative complications: 37.0% ISO versus 40.7% ANTI, (p = 0.693) were found. There were no differences in postoperative ileus (p = 0.112) nor in anastomotic leakage (3.7% vs. 5.56%, p = 1.00). Differences in “time to first flatus” and “time to first deposition” were found in favour of the antiperistaltic group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017). Anastomotic configuration did not influence hospital stay (3 days [2–6] isoperistaltic vs. 3 [2–4] antiperistaltic, p = 0.236). During follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups at 1, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.154, p = 0.498 and p = 0.683), nor in chronic diarrhoea rates in GIQLI scores (24% ISO vs. 31.4% ANTI, p = 0.541).

Conclusions

The isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis present similar results in terms of performance, safety and functionality. However, further studies must be carried out in order to assess relationship between postoperative ileus and anastomosis configuration.

Trial registration

Randomised Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT02309931).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2017) Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66(4):683–691CrossRef Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2017) Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66(4):683–691CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Martí Martínez E, Álvarez Pérez JA, Codina Cazador A, Espí A, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(1):105–114CrossRefPubMed Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos Rodríguez JL, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Martí Martínez E, Álvarez Pérez JA, Codina Cazador A, Espí A, Garcia-Granero E, ANACO Study Group (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(1):105–114CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jian-Cheng T, Shu-Sheng W, Bo Z, Jian F, Liang Z (2016) Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(48):e5538CrossRef Jian-Cheng T, Shu-Sheng W, Bo Z, Jian F, Liang Z (2016) Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer: an evaluation of short-term outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(48):e5538CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271CrossRef Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–271CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef Senagore A, Delaney C, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tan WS, Chew MH, Ooi BS, Ng KH, Lim JF, Ho KS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1333–1339CrossRefPubMed Tan WS, Chew MH, Ooi BS, Ng KH, Lim JF, Ho KS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1333–1339CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Takahashi G, Yamada M, Uchida E (2015) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis for colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 196(1):107–112CrossRefPubMed Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Takahashi G, Yamada M, Uchida E (2015) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic stapled side-to-side anastomosis for colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 196(1):107–112CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi J, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767CrossRef Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi J, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Puleo S, Sofia M, Trovato MA, Pesce A, Portale TR, Russello D, La Greca G (2013) Ileocolonic anastomosis: preferred techniques in 999 patients. A multicentric study. Surg Today 43:1145–1149CrossRefPubMed Puleo S, Sofia M, Trovato MA, Pesce A, Portale TR, Russello D, La Greca G (2013) Ileocolonic anastomosis: preferred techniques in 999 patients. A multicentric study. Surg Today 43:1145–1149CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Tewari M, Shukla HS (2005) Right colectomy with isoperistaltic side-to-side stapled ileocolic anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 89(2):99–101CrossRefPubMed Tewari M, Shukla HS (2005) Right colectomy with isoperistaltic side-to-side stapled ileocolic anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 89(2):99–101CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ovenson BC, Bergamaschi R (2016) Twisting in the wind: intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 20:51–512CrossRef Ovenson BC, Bergamaschi R (2016) Twisting in the wind: intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 20:51–512CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Folaranmi S, Rakoczy G, Bruce J, Humphrey G, Bowen J, Morabito A, Kapur P, Morecroft J, Craigie R, Cserni T (2011) Ileocaecal valve: how important is it? Pediatr Surg Int 27:613–615CrossRefPubMed Folaranmi S, Rakoczy G, Bruce J, Humphrey G, Bowen J, Morabito A, Kapur P, Morecroft J, Craigie R, Cserni T (2011) Ileocaecal valve: how important is it? Pediatr Surg Int 27:613–615CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P (2017) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1349–1356CrossRefPubMed Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P (2017) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1349–1356CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222CrossRef Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmülling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2003) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1730–1736CrossRef Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2003) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27(5):1730–1736CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kornmann VNN, Hagendoorn J, van Koeverden S, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB (2013) Totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is a technically and oncologically safe procedure. Acta Chir Belg 113:439–443CrossRefPubMed Kornmann VNN, Hagendoorn J, van Koeverden S, van Ramshorst B, Smits AB (2013) Totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is a technically and oncologically safe procedure. Acta Chir Belg 113:439–443CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Theodoropoulos GE, Papanikolaou IG, Karantanos T (2013) Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol 17:525–536CrossRefPubMed Theodoropoulos GE, Papanikolaou IG, Karantanos T (2013) Post-colectomy assessment of gastrointestinal function: a prospective study on colorectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol 17:525–536CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ben-Chaim J, Shenfeld O, Goldwasser B, Shemesh E (1995) Does de use of the ileocecal region in reconstructive urology cause persistent diarrhea? Eur Urol 27:315–318CrossRefPubMed Ben-Chaim J, Shenfeld O, Goldwasser B, Shemesh E (1995) Does de use of the ileocecal region in reconstructive urology cause persistent diarrhea? Eur Urol 27:315–318CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRefPubMed Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jessen M, Nerstrom M, Wilbek TE, Roepstorff S, Rasmussen MS, Krarup PM (2016) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1619–1624CrossRefPubMed Jessen M, Nerstrom M, Wilbek TE, Roepstorff S, Rasmussen MS, Krarup PM (2016) Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1619–1624CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Abrisqueta J, Ibañez N, Lujan J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P.(2016) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 30:65–72CrossRefPubMed Abrisqueta J, Ibañez N, Lujan J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P.(2016) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 30:65–72CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bakkevold KE (2009) Construction of an ileocolic neosphincter—Nipple valve anastomosis for prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the neoterminal ileum after ileocecal or ileocolic resection. A long-term follow-up study. J Crohns Colitis 3(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed Bakkevold KE (2009) Construction of an ileocolic neosphincter—Nipple valve anastomosis for prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease in the neoterminal ileum after ileocecal or ileocolic resection. A long-term follow-up study. J Crohns Colitis 3(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Roland BC, Mullin GE, Passi M, Zheng X, Salem A, Yolken R, Pasricha PJ (2017) A prospective evaluation of ileocecal valve dysfunction and intestinal motility derangements in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci 62(12):3525–3535CrossRef Roland BC, Mullin GE, Passi M, Zheng X, Salem A, Yolken R, Pasricha PJ (2017) A prospective evaluation of ileocecal valve dysfunction and intestinal motility derangements in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Dig Dis Sci 62(12):3525–3535CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Palmisano S, Silvestri M, Troian M, Germani P, Giudici F, de Manzini N (2017) Ileocaecal valve syndrome after surgery in adult patients: myth of reality? Colorectal Dis 19(8):e288–e295CrossRefPubMed Palmisano S, Silvestri M, Troian M, Germani P, Giudici F, de Manzini N (2017) Ileocaecal valve syndrome after surgery in adult patients: myth of reality? Colorectal Dis 19(8):e288–e295CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Magdeburg J, Glatz N, Post S (2016) Long-term functional outcome of colonic resections: how much does faecal impairment influence quality of life? Colorectal Dis 18(11):405–413CrossRef Magdeburg J, Glatz N, Post S (2016) Long-term functional outcome of colonic resections: how much does faecal impairment influence quality of life? Colorectal Dis 18(11):405–413CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Thorsen Y, Stimec B, Andersen SN, Lindstrom JC, Pfeffer F, Oresland T, Ignjatovic D, RCC study group (2016) Bowel function and quality of life after superior mesenteric nerve plexus transection in right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy. Tech Coloproctol 20(7):445–453CrossRefPubMed Thorsen Y, Stimec B, Andersen SN, Lindstrom JC, Pfeffer F, Oresland T, Ignjatovic D, RCC study group (2016) Bowel function and quality of life after superior mesenteric nerve plexus transection in right colectomy with D3 extended mesenterectomy. Tech Coloproctol 20(7):445–453CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
Authors
Noelia Ibáñez
Jesús Abrisqueta
Juan Luján
Quiteria Hernández
María Dolores Rufete
Pascual Parrilla
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6580-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2019 Go to the issue