Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019

Meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes after pure laparoscopic versus open liver surgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Authors: Jan Witowski, Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Magdalena Mizera, Michał Wysocki, Natalia Gajewska, Mateusz Sitkowski, Piotr Małczak, Piotr Major, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The advantages of laparoscopy are widely known. Nevertheless, its legitimacy in liver surgery is often questioned because of the uncertain value associated with minimally invasive methods. Our main goal was to compare the outcomes of pure laparoscopic (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases to find eligible studies. The most recent search was performed on December 1, 2017. Studies were regarded as suitable if they reported morbidity in patients undergoing LLR versus OLR. Extracted data were pooled and subsequently used in a meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Clinical applicability of results was evaluated using predictive intervals. Review was reported following the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

From 2085 articles, forty-three studies (N = 5100 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that LLR had lower overall morbidity than OLR (15.59% vs. 29.88%, p < 0.001). Moreover, major morbidity was reduced in the LLR group (3.78% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of mortality (1.58% vs. 2.96%, p = 0.05) and both 3- and 5-year overall survival (68.97% vs. 68.12%, p = 0.41) and disease-free survival (46.57% vs. 44.84%, p = 0.46).

Conclusions

The meta-analysis showed that LLR is beneficial in terms of overall morbidity and non-procedure-specific complications. That being said, these results are based on non-randomized trials. For these reasons, we are calling for randomization in upcoming studies. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42018084576.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yagmur Y, Akbulut S, Gumus S, Babur M, Can MA (2016) Laparoscopic management of hydatid cyst of the liver. S Afr J Surg 54:14–17PubMed Yagmur Y, Akbulut S, Gumus S, Babur M, Can MA (2016) Laparoscopic management of hydatid cyst of the liver. S Afr J Surg 54:14–17PubMed
14.
go back to reference Han EC, Ryoo S-B, Park JW, Yi JW, Oh H-K, Choe EK, Ha H-K, Park BK, Moon SH, Jeong S-Y, Park KJ (2017) Oncologic and surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity-matched study. PLoS ONE 12:e0178920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han EC, Ryoo S-B, Park JW, Yi JW, Oh H-K, Choe EK, Ha H-K, Park BK, Moon SH, Jeong S-Y, Park KJ (2017) Oncologic and surgical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with liver cirrhosis: a propensity-matched study. PLoS ONE 12:e0178920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G (2015) Meta-analysis with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G (2015) Meta-analysis with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463CrossRefPubMed Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMed
30.
37.
go back to reference Harada N, Maeda T, Yoshizumi T, Ikeda T, Kayashima H, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Takaki S, Maehara Y (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection is a feasible treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. 3498:3489–3497 Harada N, Maeda T, Yoshizumi T, Ikeda T, Kayashima H, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Takaki S, Maehara Y (2016) Laparoscopic liver resection is a feasible treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. 3498:3489–3497
38.
go back to reference Jiang X, Liu L, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, Huang J, Zhous H, Zeng L (2016) Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes. JBUON 21:135–141PubMed Jiang X, Liu L, Zhang Q, Jiang Y, Huang J, Zhous H, Zeng L (2016) Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes. JBUON 21:135–141PubMed
47.
go back to reference Harimoto N, Ikeda T, Takeishi K, Itoh S, Yamashita YI, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Kawanaka H, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2015) Outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy in the semi-prone position for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6, 7, or 8. Anticancer Res 35:4167–4170PubMed Harimoto N, Ikeda T, Takeishi K, Itoh S, Yamashita YI, Ikegami T, Yoshizumi T, Kawanaka H, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2015) Outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy in the semi-prone position for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6, 7, or 8. Anticancer Res 35:4167–4170PubMed
48.
go back to reference Jiang H, Cao J (2015) Impact of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy on perioperative clinical outcomes of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma Hai-tao. Chin Med Sci J 30:80–83CrossRefPubMed Jiang H, Cao J (2015) Impact of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy on perioperative clinical outcomes of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma Hai-tao. Chin Med Sci J 30:80–83CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Luo L, Zou H, Yao Y, Huang X (2015) Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes comparison. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:18772–18778PubMedPubMedCentral Luo L, Zou H, Yao Y, Huang X (2015) Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short- and long-term outcomes comparison. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:18772–18778PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Takemura S, Shinkawa H, Nishioka T, Hamano G, Kinoshita M, Ito T, Kubo S (2015) Outcomes of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study with propensity score matching. Eur Surg Res 55:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1159/000439274 CrossRefPubMed Tanaka S, Takemura S, Shinkawa H, Nishioka T, Hamano G, Kinoshita M, Ito T, Kubo S (2015) Outcomes of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study with propensity score matching. Eur Surg Res 55:291–301. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000439274 CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Siniscalchi A, Ercolani G, Tarozzi G, Gamberini L, Cipolat L, Pinna AD, Faenza S (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: differences in intraoperative and early postoperative outcome among cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a retrospective observational study. HPB Surg 2014:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/871251 CrossRef Siniscalchi A, Ercolani G, Tarozzi G, Gamberini L, Cipolat L, Pinna AD, Faenza S (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: differences in intraoperative and early postoperative outcome among cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a retrospective observational study. HPB Surg 2014:1–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1155/​2014/​871251 CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S, Kawamoto K, Wada H, Eguchi H, Tanemura M, Umeshita K, Doki Y, Mori M (2013) Hepatectomy based on the tumor hemodynamics for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison among the hybrid and pure laparoscopic procedures and open surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2499-6 CrossRef Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Marubashi S, Kawamoto K, Wada H, Eguchi H, Tanemura M, Umeshita K, Doki Y, Mori M (2013) Hepatectomy based on the tumor hemodynamics for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison among the hybrid and pure laparoscopic procedures and open surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 27:610–617. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-012-2499-6 CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Truant S, Bouras AF, Hebbar M, Boleslawski E, Fromont G, Dharancy S, Leteurtre E, Zerbib P, Pruvot FR (2011) Laparoscopic resection vs. open liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 25:3668–3677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1775-1 CrossRef Truant S, Bouras AF, Hebbar M, Boleslawski E, Fromont G, Dharancy S, Leteurtre E, Zerbib P, Pruvot FR (2011) Laparoscopic resection vs. open liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 25:3668–3677. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-011-1775-1 CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:2004–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9503-6 CrossRef Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:2004–2011. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-007-9503-6 CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Nguyen K, Marsh J, Tsung A, JL S, Gamblin T, DA G (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356CrossRefPubMed Nguyen K, Marsh J, Tsung A, JL S, Gamblin T, DA G (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes after pure laparoscopic versus open liver surgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients
Authors
Jan Witowski
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
Magdalena Mizera
Michał Wysocki
Natalia Gajewska
Mateusz Sitkowski
Piotr Małczak
Piotr Major
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6431-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019 Go to the issue