Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018

Additional value of EUS in oesophageal cancer patients staged N0 on PET/CT: validation of a prognostic model

Authors: K. G. Foley, P. Fielding, W. G. Lewis, S. A. Roberts

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Lymph node metastases are a major prognostic indicator in oesophageal cancer. Radiological staging largely influences treatment decisions and is becoming more reliant on PET and CT. However, the sensitivity of these modalities is suboptimal and is known to under-stage disease. The primary aim of this study was to validate a published prognostic model in oesophageal cancer patients staged N0 with PET/CT, which showed that EUS nodal status was an independent predictor of survival. The secondary aim was to assess the prognostic significance of pathological lymph node metastases in this cohort.

Methods

An independent validation cohort included 139 consecutive patients from a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network staged N0 with PET/CT between 1st January 2013 and 31st June 2015. Replicating the original study, two Cox regression models were produced: one included EUS T-stage and EUS N-stage, and one included EUS T-stage and EUS N0 versus N+. The primary outcome of the prognostic model was overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis assessed differences in OS between pathological node-negative (pN0) and node-positive (pN+) groups. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean OS of the validation cohort was 29.8 months (95% CI 27.1–35.2). EUS T-stage was significantly and independently associated with OS in both models (p = 0.011 and p = 0.012, respectively). EUS N-stage and EUS N0 versus N+ were not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.553 and p = 0.359, respectively). There was a significant difference in OS between pN0 and pN+ groups (χ2 13.315, df 1, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Lymph node metastases have a significant detrimental effect on OS. This validation study did not replicate the results of the developed prognostic model but the continued benefit of EUS in patients staged N0 with PET/CT was demonstrated. EUS remains a valuable component of a multi-modality approach to oesophageal cancer staging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Gwynne S, Bateman A, Gollins S, Radhakrishna G, Hawkins M, Canham J, Lewis W, Grabsch HI, Sharma RA, Wade W, Maggs R, Tranter B, Roberts A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Maughan T, Griffiths G, Crosby T (2015) NEOSCOPE: a randomised phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine or paclitaxel/carboplatin based chemoradiation as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 15:48CrossRef Mukherjee S, Hurt CN, Gwynne S, Bateman A, Gollins S, Radhakrishna G, Hawkins M, Canham J, Lewis W, Grabsch HI, Sharma RA, Wade W, Maggs R, Tranter B, Roberts A, Sebag-Montefiore D, Maughan T, Griffiths G, Crosby T (2015) NEOSCOPE: a randomised phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by either oxaliplatin/capecitabine or paclitaxel/carboplatin based chemoradiation as pre-operative regimen for resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 15:48CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kayani B, Zacharakis E, Ahmed K, Hanna GB (2011) Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma—a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:747–753CrossRef Kayani B, Zacharakis E, Ahmed K, Hanna GB (2011) Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma—a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:747–753CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 88:1781–1787CrossRef Blazeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Alderson D (2000) A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Cancer 88:1781–1787CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roberts SA, Kay C (2014) Oesophagus and stomach cancers. In: Nicholson T (ed) Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management. Royal College of Radiologists, London Roberts SA, Kay C (2014) Oesophagus and stomach cancers. In: Nicholson T (ed) Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management. Royal College of Radiologists, London
5.
go back to reference National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (2016) An audit of the care received by people with oesophago-gastric cancer in England and Wales annual report. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit, London National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (2016) An audit of the care received by people with oesophago-gastric cancer in England and Wales annual report. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit, London
6.
go back to reference van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2008) Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 98:547–557CrossRef van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2008) Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 98:547–557CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Foley KG, Lewis WG, Fielding P, Karran A, Chan D, Blake P, Roberts SA (2014) N-staging of oesophageal and junctional carcinoma: is there still a role for EUS in patients staged N0 at PET/CT? Clin Radiol 69:959–964CrossRef Foley KG, Lewis WG, Fielding P, Karran A, Chan D, Blake P, Roberts SA (2014) N-staging of oesophageal and junctional carcinoma: is there still a role for EUS in patients staged N0 at PET/CT? Clin Radiol 69:959–964CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kapoor V, McCook BM, Torok FS (2004) An introduction to PET-CT imaging. Radiographics 24:523–543CrossRef Kapoor V, McCook BM, Torok FS (2004) An introduction to PET-CT imaging. Radiographics 24:523–543CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind CH (2009) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind CH (2009) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
10.
go back to reference Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan E, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 34:187–220 Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 34:187–220
12.
go back to reference Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379CrossRef Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1373–1379CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594CrossRef Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 350:g7594CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paraf F, Flejou JF, Pignon JP, Fekete F, Potet F (1995) Surgical pathology of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus. Analysis of 67 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 19:183–191CrossRef Paraf F, Flejou JF, Pignon JP, Fekete F, Potet F (1995) Surgical pathology of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus. Analysis of 67 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 19:183–191CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Reid TD, Chan DS, Roberts SA, Crosby TD, Williams GT, Lewis WG (2012) Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography. Br J Cancer 107:1925–1931CrossRef Reid TD, Chan DS, Roberts SA, Crosby TD, Williams GT, Lewis WG (2012) Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography. Br J Cancer 107:1925–1931CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hiele M, DeLeyn P, Schurmans P, Lerut A, Huys S, Geboes K, Gevers AM, Rutgeerts P (1997) Relation between endoscopic ultrasound findings and outcome of patients with tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Gastrointest Endosc 45:381–386CrossRef Hiele M, DeLeyn P, Schurmans P, Lerut A, Huys S, Geboes K, Gevers AM, Rutgeerts P (1997) Relation between endoscopic ultrasound findings and outcome of patients with tumors of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Gastrointest Endosc 45:381–386CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Debray TP, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG (2015) A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 68:279–289CrossRef Debray TP, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG (2015) A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 68:279–289CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Egglin TK, Feinstein AR (1996) Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology. JAMA 276:1752–1755CrossRef Egglin TK, Feinstein AR (1996) Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology. JAMA 276:1752–1755CrossRef
19.
go back to reference McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277CrossRef McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Surti S (2015) Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med 56:98–105CrossRef Surti S (2015) Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med 56:98–105CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, Oyen WJ, Kotzerke J, Hoekstra OS, Pruim J, Marsden PK, Tatsch K, Hoekstra CJ, Visser EP, Arends B, Verzijlbergen FJ, Zijlstra JM, Comans EF, Lammertsma AA, Paans AM, Willemsen AT, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Schaefer-Prokop C, Delbeke D, Baum RP, Chiti A, Krause BJ (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:181–200CrossRef Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, Oyen WJ, Kotzerke J, Hoekstra OS, Pruim J, Marsden PK, Tatsch K, Hoekstra CJ, Visser EP, Arends B, Verzijlbergen FJ, Zijlstra JM, Comans EF, Lammertsma AA, Paans AM, Willemsen AT, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Schaefer-Prokop C, Delbeke D, Baum RP, Chiti A, Krause BJ (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:181–200CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Foley KG, Christian A, Fielding P, Lewis WG, Roberts SA (2017) Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 72:e691–e697CrossRef Foley KG, Christian A, Fielding P, Lewis WG, Roberts SA (2017) Accuracy of contemporary oesophageal cancer lymph node staging with radiological-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 72:e691–e697CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mallett S, Royston P, Waters R, Dutton S, Altman DG (2010) Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med 8:21CrossRef Mallett S, Royston P, Waters R, Dutton S, Altman DG (2010) Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med 8:21CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Abrams K, Kyzas PA, Malats N, Briggs A, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H, Group P (2013) Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research. PLoS Med 10:e1001380CrossRef Riley RD, Hayden JA, Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, Abrams K, Kyzas PA, Malats N, Briggs A, Schroter S, Altman DG, Hemingway H, Group P (2013) Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: prognostic factor research. PLoS Med 10:e1001380CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee DE, Altman DG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ 338:b375CrossRef Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, Grobbee DE, Altman DG (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ 338:b375CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kyzas PA, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP (2007) Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results. Eur J Cancer 43:2559–2579CrossRef Kyzas PA, Denaxa-Kyza D, Ioannidis JP (2007) Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results. Eur J Cancer 43:2559–2579CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Bartels H, Fink U (2001) Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 234:360–369CrossRef Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Bartels H, Fink U (2001) Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 234:360–369CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rice TW, Zuccaro G Jr, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH, Goldblum JR (1998) Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg 65:787–792CrossRef Rice TW, Zuccaro G Jr, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH, Goldblum JR (1998) Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg 65:787–792CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473CrossRef Altman DG, Royston P (2000) What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 19:453–473CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Additional value of EUS in oesophageal cancer patients staged N0 on PET/CT: validation of a prognostic model
Authors
K. G. Foley
P. Fielding
W. G. Lewis
S. A. Roberts
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6259-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2018 Go to the issue