Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018

01-05-2018

Laparoscopy as a useful selection tool for patients with prior surgery and peritoneal metastases suitable for multimodality treatment strategies

Authors: Philipp von Breitenbuch, Thomas Boerner, Tonia Jeiter, Pompiliu Piso, Hans J. Schlitt

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complete macroscopic cytoreduction in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is the basic requirement for long-term survival. Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) can be difficult and of limited clinical value secondary to postoperative or tumor-induced adhesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of DL in patients with prior surgery and PC.

Methods

The database of the surgical department of the University Medical Center of Regensburg was reviewed (9/2010–10/2014) selecting for DL in patients with PC. The operative report had a standardized format allowing for the determination of the extent of the intra-abdominal visible area and the extent of tumor on the surface of the small intestine. For the classification we used our own developed score.

Results

DL was performed in 102 patients. The complete abdominal cavity was evaluable in 48%. At least two quadrants and the largest part of the small intestine could be assessed in 70%. 37% of the patients had massive tumor manifestation on the small intestine or its mesentery. PCI (Peritoneal Cancer Index) could not be calculated in 71% of the patients due to incomplete visualization of the abdominal cavity and/or multiple tumor manifestations on the small intestine. 54% of patients were classified as non-resectable and 85% who seemed suitable for cytoreductive surgery underwent a CCR-0 resection and HIPEC.

Conclusions

In spite of prior surgery and PC, DL is frequently possible and a useful tool to define the extent of tumor spread. Lots of patients can be prevented from needless open laparotomy. The extent of tumor involvement of the small intestine seems to be more relevant than calculation of the PCI to determine the potential for complete resection. Therefore, in the presence of adhesions, inspection of the complete abdominal cavity does not offer added clinical benefit and further adhesiolysis can be avoided.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bakrin N, Bereder JM, Decullier E et al (2013) Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(12):1435–1443CrossRefPubMed Bakrin N, Bereder JM, Decullier E et al (2013) Peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a French multicentre retrospective cohort study of 566 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(12):1435–1443CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Esquivel J, Piso P, Verwaal V et al (2014) American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies opinion statement on defining expectations from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 110(7):777–778CrossRefPubMed Esquivel J, Piso P, Verwaal V et al (2014) American Society of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies opinion statement on defining expectations from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 110(7):777–778CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Glehen O, Gilly FN, Boutitie F et al (2010) Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a multi-institutional study of 1290 patients. Cancer 116(24):5608–5618CrossRefPubMed Glehen O, Gilly FN, Boutitie F et al (2010) Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a multi-institutional study of 1290 patients. Cancer 116(24):5608–5618CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Glehen O, Mithieux F, Osinsky D et al (2003) Surgery combined with peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia in abdominal cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 21(5):799–806CrossRefPubMed Glehen O, Mithieux F, Osinsky D et al (2003) Surgery combined with peritonectomy procedures and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia in abdominal cancers with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 21(5):799–806CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Spiliotis J, Halkia E, Lianos E et al (2015) Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective randomized phase III study. Annal Surg Oncol 22(5):1570–1575CrossRef Spiliotis J, Halkia E, Lianos E et al (2015) Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective randomized phase III study. Annal Surg Oncol 22(5):1570–1575CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sugarbaker PH (2006) New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome? Lancet Oncol 7(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed Sugarbaker PH (2006) New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome? Lancet Oncol 7(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E et al (2003) Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3737–3743CrossRefPubMed Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E et al (2003) Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3737–3743CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Glehen O, Gilly FN (2003) Quantitative prognostic indicators of peritoneal surface malignancy: carcinomatosis, sarcomatosis, and peritoneal mesothelioma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12(3):649–671CrossRefPubMed Glehen O, Gilly FN (2003) Quantitative prognostic indicators of peritoneal surface malignancy: carcinomatosis, sarcomatosis, and peritoneal mesothelioma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 12(3):649–671CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Elias D, Lefevre JH, Chevalier J et al (2009) Complete cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. J Clin Oncol 27(5):681–685CrossRefPubMed Elias D, Lefevre JH, Chevalier J et al (2009) Complete cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. J Clin Oncol 27(5):681–685CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82:359–374CrossRefPubMed Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82:359–374CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Portilla AG, Shigeki K, Dario B, Marcello D (2008) The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. J Surg Oncol 98(4):228–231CrossRefPubMed Portilla AG, Shigeki K, Dario B, Marcello D (2008) The intraoperative staging systems in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. J Surg Oncol 98(4):228–231CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mohkam K, Passot G, Cotte E et al (2016) Resectability of peritoneal carcinomatosis: learnings from a prospective cohort of 533 consecutive patients selected for cytoreductive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 23(4):1261–1270CrossRefPubMed Mohkam K, Passot G, Cotte E et al (2016) Resectability of peritoneal carcinomatosis: learnings from a prospective cohort of 533 consecutive patients selected for cytoreductive surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 23(4):1261–1270CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Klumpp B, Schwenzer NF, Gatidis S et al (2014) Assessment of relapse in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using F-18-FDG-PET/CT. RoFo 186(4):359–366CrossRefPubMed Klumpp B, Schwenzer NF, Gatidis S et al (2014) Assessment of relapse in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy using F-18-FDG-PET/CT. RoFo 186(4):359–366CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Esquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A et al (2010) Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol 102(6):565–570CrossRefPubMed Esquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A et al (2010) Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol 102(6):565–570CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH (1993) Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 72(5):1631–1636CrossRefPubMed Jacquet P, Jelinek JS, Steves MA, Sugarbaker PH (1993) Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer 72(5):1631–1636CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL (2009) Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 16(2):327–333CrossRefPubMed Koh JL, Yan TD, Glenn D, Morris DL (2009) Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 16(2):327–333CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rivard JD, Temple WJ, McConnell YJ, Sultan H, Mack LA (2014) Preoperative computed tomography does not predict resectability in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Surg 207(5):760–764. (Discussion 764–765).CrossRefPubMed Rivard JD, Temple WJ, McConnell YJ, Sultan H, Mack LA (2014) Preoperative computed tomography does not predict resectability in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Am J Surg 207(5):760–764. (Discussion 764–765).CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cotte E, Passot G, Gilly FN, Glehen O (2010) Selection of patients and staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2(1):31–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cotte E, Passot G, Gilly FN, Glehen O (2010) Selection of patients and staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2(1):31–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Pomel C, Appleyard TL, Gouy S, Rouzier R, Elias D (2005) The role of laparoscopy to evaluate candidates for complete cytoreduction of peritoneal carcinomatosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(5):540–543CrossRefPubMed Pomel C, Appleyard TL, Gouy S, Rouzier R, Elias D (2005) The role of laparoscopy to evaluate candidates for complete cytoreduction of peritoneal carcinomatosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 31(5):540–543CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Valle M, Garofalo A (2006) Laparoscopic staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(6):625–627CrossRefPubMed Valle M, Garofalo A (2006) Laparoscopic staging of peritoneal surface malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(6):625–627CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Garofalo A, Valle M (2003) [Staging videolaparoscopy of peritoneal carcinomatosis]. Tumori 89(4 Suppl):70–77PubMed Garofalo A, Valle M (2003) [Staging videolaparoscopy of peritoneal carcinomatosis]. Tumori 89(4 Suppl):70–77PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopy as a useful selection tool for patients with prior surgery and peritoneal metastases suitable for multimodality treatment strategies
Authors
Philipp von Breitenbuch
Thomas Boerner
Tonia Jeiter
Pompiliu Piso
Hans J. Schlitt
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5923-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018 Go to the issue