Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

01-04-2018

Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones

Authors: Palanisamy Senthilnathan, Dhawal Sharma, Sandeep C. Sabnis, S. Srivatsan Gurumurthy, E. Senthil Anand, V. P. Nalankilli, Natesan Anand Vijai, Palanivelu Praveen Raj, Ramakrishnan Parthasarathy, Subbaiah Rajapandian, Chinnusamy Palanivelu

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stone extraction is generally accepted as first line management for common bile duct (CBD) stones. CBD exploration, either by open or laparoscopic approach nowadays, is usually reserved for ERCP failures, complicated stone locations, along with altered anatomical situations. The aim of this study was to highlight the increasing role of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy which is not only a reliable but also as a rescue procedure for those failed ERCP cases due to complicated bile duct stones.

Materials and methods

It is a retrospective review of the database, from a tertiary care teaching institution from India, from Jan 2012 up to December 2016.

Results

Out of total 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy, 28 had failed ERC stone clearance while two patients were directly offered drainage in view of unfavorable anatomy. The major reasons for failed ERC stone clearance were as follows—multiple large calculi (42.8%), recurrent stones (21.4%), and associated stricture (21.4%). Mean operating time was 130 (± 27) minutes with mean blood loss of 60 (± 19) ml. Stone extraction was successful, primarily by milking in 13 (43.33%) patients, rest required augmentation by Dormia basket/balloon. Two patients (6.66%) developed controlled bile leak which resolved with conservative treatment. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (IQR 3–9). Mean duration of follow-up was 17 (± 3.2) months.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with choledochoduodenostomy has been shown to be a safe, reliable, and efficient method for treating complex CBDS, especially after failed ERCP procedures.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bennet W, Zimmerman MA, Campsen J, Mandell MS, Bak T, Wachs M, Kam I (2009) Choledochoduodenostomy is a safe alternative to Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation. World J Surg 33:1022–1025. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9885-1 CrossRefPubMed Bennet W, Zimmerman MA, Campsen J, Mandell MS, Bak T, Wachs M, Kam I (2009) Choledochoduodenostomy is a safe alternative to Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation. World J Surg 33:1022–1025. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9885-1 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gold MS, Maginot A, Gliedman ML (1985) Choledochoduodenostomy after previous gastrectomy or duodenal operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:142–144PubMed Gold MS, Maginot A, Gliedman ML (1985) Choledochoduodenostomy after previous gastrectomy or duodenal operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:142–144PubMed
5.
go back to reference Jeyapalan M, Almeida JA, Michaelson RLP, Franklin ME (2002) Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: review of a 4-year experience with an uncommon problem. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:148–153CrossRefPubMed Jeyapalan M, Almeida JA, Michaelson RLP, Franklin ME (2002) Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: review of a 4-year experience with an uncommon problem. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:148–153CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Demirel BT, Kekilli M, Onal IK, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Kacar S, Kilic ZMY, Sasmaz N, Sahin B (2011) ERCP experience in patients with choledochoduodenostomy: diagnostic findings and therapeutic management. Surg Endosc 25:1043–1047. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1313-6 CrossRefPubMed Demirel BT, Kekilli M, Onal IK, Parlak E, Disibeyaz S, Kacar S, Kilic ZMY, Sasmaz N, Sahin B (2011) ERCP experience in patients with choledochoduodenostomy: diagnostic findings and therapeutic management. Surg Endosc 25:1043–1047. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1313-6 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bosanquet DC, Cole M, Conway KC, Lewis MH (2012) Choledochoduodenostomy re-evaluated in the endoscopic and laparoscopic era. Hepatogastroenterology 59:2410–2415. doi:10.5754/hge11057 PubMed Bosanquet DC, Cole M, Conway KC, Lewis MH (2012) Choledochoduodenostomy re-evaluated in the endoscopic and laparoscopic era. Hepatogastroenterology 59:2410–2415. doi:10.​5754/​hge11057 PubMed
10.
13.
go back to reference Escudero-Fabre A, Escallon A, Sack J, Halpern NB, Aldrete JS (1991) Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5–15 years. Ann Surg 213:635–42 (discussion 643–44) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Escudero-Fabre A, Escallon A, Sack J, Halpern NB, Aldrete JS (1991) Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5–15 years. Ann Surg 213:635–42 (discussion 643–44) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Madden JL, Chun JY, Kandalaft S, Parekh M (1970) Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure? Am J Surg 119:45–54CrossRefPubMed Madden JL, Chun JY, Kandalaft S, Parekh M (1970) Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure? Am J Surg 119:45–54CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Degenshein GA (1974) Choledochoduodenostomy: an 18 year study of 175 consecutive cases. Surgery 76:319–324PubMed Degenshein GA (1974) Choledochoduodenostomy: an 18 year study of 175 consecutive cases. Surgery 76:319–324PubMed
16.
go back to reference Engin A, Haberal M, Sanaç Y (1978) Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 65:99–100CrossRefPubMed Engin A, Haberal M, Sanaç Y (1978) Side-to-side choledochoduodenostomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 65:99–100CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kaminski DL, Barner HB, Codd JE, Wolfe BM (1979) Evaluation of the results of external choledochoduodenostomy for retained, recurrent, or primary common duct stones. Am J Surg 137:162–166CrossRefPubMed Kaminski DL, Barner HB, Codd JE, Wolfe BM (1979) Evaluation of the results of external choledochoduodenostomy for retained, recurrent, or primary common duct stones. Am J Surg 137:162–166CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Thomas CG, Nicholson CP, Owen J (1971) Effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincterotomy in the treatment of benign obstruction of the common duct. Ann Surg 173:845–856CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas CG, Nicholson CP, Owen J (1971) Effectiveness of choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincterotomy in the treatment of benign obstruction of the common duct. Ann Surg 173:845–856CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ (1981) Choledochoduodenostomy in calculous biliary tract disease. Br J Surg 68:762–765CrossRefPubMed Lygidakis NJ (1981) Choledochoduodenostomy in calculous biliary tract disease. Br J Surg 68:762–765CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ (1983) Surgical approaches to recurrent choledocholithiasis. Choledochoduodenostomy versus T-tube drainage after choledochotomy. Am J Surg 145:636–639CrossRefPubMed Lygidakis NJ (1983) Surgical approaches to recurrent choledocholithiasis. Choledochoduodenostomy versus T-tube drainage after choledochotomy. Am J Surg 145:636–639CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Keighley MR, Burdon DW, Baddeley RM, Dorricott NJ, Oates GD, Watts GT, Alexander-Williams J (1976) Complications of supraduodenal choledochotomy: a comparison of three methods of management. Br J Surg 63:754–758CrossRefPubMed Keighley MR, Burdon DW, Baddeley RM, Dorricott NJ, Oates GD, Watts GT, Alexander-Williams J (1976) Complications of supraduodenal choledochotomy: a comparison of three methods of management. Br J Surg 63:754–758CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Vallon AG (1981) British experience with duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 68:373–375CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Vallon AG (1981) British experience with duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 68:373–375CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Baker AR, Neoptolemos JP, Leese T, Fossard DP (1987) Choledochoduodenostomy, transduodenal sphincteroplasty and sphincterotomy for calculi of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:245–251PubMed Baker AR, Neoptolemos JP, Leese T, Fossard DP (1987) Choledochoduodenostomy, transduodenal sphincteroplasty and sphincterotomy for calculi of the common bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:245–251PubMed
28.
go back to reference Thomas E, Grant AK, Holford M, Ringwood D, Derrington AW, Magarey JR (1973) Bacterial flora in the duodenum of patients after biliary fenestration. Br J Surg 60:107–111CrossRefPubMed Thomas E, Grant AK, Holford M, Ringwood D, Derrington AW, Magarey JR (1973) Bacterial flora in the duodenum of patients after biliary fenestration. Br J Surg 60:107–111CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Baker AR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP (1985) Sump syndrome following choledochoduodenostomy and its endoscopic treatment. Br J Surg 72:433–435CrossRefPubMed Baker AR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP (1985) Sump syndrome following choledochoduodenostomy and its endoscopic treatment. Br J Surg 72:433–435CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones
Authors
Palanisamy Senthilnathan
Dhawal Sharma
Sandeep C. Sabnis
S. Srivatsan Gurumurthy
E. Senthil Anand
V. P. Nalankilli
Natesan Anand Vijai
Palanivelu Praveen Raj
Ramakrishnan Parthasarathy
Subbaiah Rajapandian
Chinnusamy Palanivelu
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5868-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Go to the issue