Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

01-04-2018

Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?

Authors: H. Alejandro Rodriguez, Monica T. Young, Hope T. Jackson, Brant K. Oelschlager, Andrew S. Wright

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the current era, trainees frequently use unvetted online resources for their own education, including viewing surgical videos on YouTube. While operative videos are an important resource in surgical education, YouTube content is not selected or organized by quality but instead is ranked by popularity and other factors. This creates a potential for videos that feature poor technique or critical safety violations to become the most viewed for a given procedure.

Methods

A YouTube search for “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy” was performed. Search results were screened to exclude animations and lectures; the top ten operative videos were evaluated. Three reviewers independently analyzed each of the 10 videos. Technical skill was rated using the GOALS score. Establishment of a critical view of safety (CVS) was scored according to CVS “doublet view” score, where a score of ≥5 points (out of 6) is considered satisfactory. Videos were also screened for safety concerns not listed by the previous tools.

Results

Median competence score was 8 (±1.76) and difficulty was 2 (±1.8). GOALS score median was 18 (±3.4). Only one video achieved adequate critical view of safety; median CVS score was 2 (range 0–6). Five videos were noted to have other potentially dangerous safety violations, including placing hot ultrasonic shears on the duodenum, non-clipping of the cystic artery, blind dissection in the hepatocystic triangle, and damage to the liver capsule.

Conclusions

Top ranked laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos on YouTube show suboptimal technique with half of videos demonstrating concerning maneuvers and only one in ten having an adequate critical view of safety. While observing operative videos can be an important learning tool, surgical educators should be aware of the low quality of popular videos on YouTube. Dissemination of high-quality content on video sharing platforms should be a priority for surgical societies.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Al-Sabah S, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC (2011) A tool for training and evaluation of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the Global Operative assessment of laparoscopic skills-groin hernia (GOALS-GH). Am J Surg 201:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.006 CrossRefPubMed Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Al-Sabah S, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC (2011) A tool for training and evaluation of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the Global Operative assessment of laparoscopic skills-groin hernia (GOALS-GH). Am J Surg 201:54–61. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2010.​09.​006 CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Kramp KH, van Det MJ, Hoff C, Lamme B, Veeger NJGM, Pierie J-PEN (2015) Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ 72:351–358. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.006 CrossRefPubMed Kramp KH, van Det MJ, Hoff C, Lamme B, Veeger NJGM, Pierie J-PEN (2015) Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Educ 72:351–358. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jsurg.​2014.​08.​006 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bellorin O, Kundel A, Sharma S, Ramirez-Valderrama A, Lee P (2016) Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score. Surg Endosc 30:3654–3660. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4617-8 CrossRefPubMed Bellorin O, Kundel A, Sharma S, Ramirez-Valderrama A, Lee P (2016) Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score. Surg Endosc 30:3654–3660. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4617-8 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JBF, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1639-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JBF, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-1639-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Fanelli RD, Asbun HJ, Aggarwal R (2015) SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 29:1–12. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4079-z Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Fanelli RD, Asbun HJ, Aggarwal R (2015) SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 29:1–12. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4079-z
17.
Metadata
Title
Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?
Authors
H. Alejandro Rodriguez
Monica T. Young
Hope T. Jackson
Brant K. Oelschlager
Andrew S. Wright
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5853-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Go to the issue