Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017

01-12-2017

Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis decrease the risk of recurrent symptoms in small bowel obstruction? A propensity score-matched analysis

Authors: Siyuan Yao, Eiji Tanaka, Yugo Matsui, Atsushi Ikeda, Teppei Murakami, Tatsuo Okumoto, Takehisa Harada

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction have generally been satisfactory over the short term. However, the long-term outcomes, including recurrence of symptoms and management of recurrence, remain controversial. This study compares the long-term outcomes of a series of laparoscopic and open surgery procedures for the treatment of small bowel obstruction.

Methods

Patients who underwent adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction at our institution between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 156 patients were enrolled, 78 with laparoscopic and 78 with open surgery. Propensity score matching was used to minimize the bias in patient selection. Long-term outcomes included incidence of recurrent symptoms and reoperation. In addition to the comparison of outcomes, risk factor assessment for recurrent symptoms and analysis of detailed information in patients with reoperation were performed. Statistical methods included χ 2 test, Mann–Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazards model, and Kaplan–Meier plots with log-rank comparison.

Results

Laparoscopy was performed in a younger population with milder bowel dilation and less complicated etiologies. These factors were used to construct the propensity score model, which yielded a matched cohort of 52 legs in each group. Laparoscopy achieved good short-term outcomes including early recovery of gastrointestinal function, reduced incidence of complications, and shorter hospital stay. For long-term outcomes, while the overall recurrence rate did not differ between the groups (11.5 vs 7.7%), the incidence of reoperation for recurrence was significantly higher in the laparoscopically treated group (7.7 vs 0%, p = .017). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that multiple prior surgeries (≥3 times) were a risk factor for overall recurrence (hazard ratio 7.39, p = .041).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis did not decrease the incidence of recurrent symptoms; rather, it was related to higher incidence of recurrent small bowel obstruction requiring surgical treatment.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc 29:2525–2532. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-4015-7 CrossRefPubMed Byrne J, Saleh F, Ambrosini L, Quereshy F, Jackson TD, Okrainec A (2015) Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes. Surg Endosc 29:2525–2532. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-014-4015-7 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lombardo S, Baum K, Filho JD, Nirula R (2014) Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:696–703. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000156 CrossRefPubMed Lombardo S, Baum K, Filho JD, Nirula R (2014) Should adhesive small bowel obstruction be managed laparoscopically? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program propensity score analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:696–703. doi:10.​1097/​TA.​0000000000000156​ CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sato Y, Ido K, Kumagai M, Isoda N, Hozumi M, Nagamine N, Ono K, Shibusawa H, Togashi K, Sugano K (2001) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 54:476–479CrossRefPubMed Sato Y, Ido K, Kumagai M, Isoda N, Hozumi M, Nagamine N, Ono K, Shibusawa H, Togashi K, Sugano K (2001) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc 54:476–479CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mathieu X, Thill V, Simoens C, Smets D, Ngongang C, Debergh N, da Costa PM (2008) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study on 156 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 55:522–526PubMed Mathieu X, Thill V, Simoens C, Smets D, Ngongang C, Debergh N, da Costa PM (2008) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: a retrospective study on 156 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 55:522–526PubMed
14.
go back to reference Fevang BT, Fevang J, Lie SA, Soreide O, Svanes K, Viste A (2004) Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 240:193–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fevang BT, Fevang J, Lie SA, Soreide O, Svanes K, Viste A (2004) Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 240:193–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A, R French Association for Surgical (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71:641–646CrossRefPubMed Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A, R French Association for Surgical (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71:641–646CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schob O, Turina M (2010) Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:57–63. doi:10.1007/s00423-009-0490-z CrossRefPubMed Grafen FC, Neuhaus V, Schob O, Turina M (2010) Management of acute small bowel obstruction from intestinal adhesions: indications for laparoscopic surgery in a community teaching hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:57–63. doi:10.​1007/​s00423-009-0490-z CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lujan HJ, Oren A, Plasencia G, Canelon G, Gomez E, Hernandez-Cano A, Jacobs M (2006) Laparoscopic management as the initial treatment of acute small bowel obstruction. JSLS 10:466–472PubMedPubMedCentral Lujan HJ, Oren A, Plasencia G, Canelon G, Gomez E, Hernandez-Cano A, Jacobs M (2006) Laparoscopic management as the initial treatment of acute small bowel obstruction. JSLS 10:466–472PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Khaikin M, Schneidereit N, Cera S, Sands D, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AM 3rd, Wexner SD (2007) Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc 21:742–746. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9212-1 CrossRefPubMed Khaikin M, Schneidereit N, Cera S, Sands D, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AM 3rd, Wexner SD (2007) Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost-effectiveness. Surg Endosc 21:742–746. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-007-9212-1 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sallinen V, Wikstrom H, Victorzon M, Salminen P, Koivukangas V, Haukijarvi E, Enholm B, Leppaniemi A, Mentula P (2014) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction—a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Surg 14:77. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-14-77 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sallinen V, Wikstrom H, Victorzon M, Salminen P, Koivukangas V, Haukijarvi E, Enholm B, Leppaniemi A, Mentula P (2014) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction—a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Surg 14:77. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2482-14-77 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Garimella V, Monson JR, Fleming FJ (2014) Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg Endosc 28:65–73. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3162-6 CrossRefPubMed Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Rickles AS, Garimella V, Monson JR, Fleming FJ (2014) Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg Endosc 28:65–73. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3162-6 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Davies SW, Gillen JR, Guidry CA, Newhook TE, Pope NH, Hranjec T, Sawyer RG, Hallowell PT (2014) A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care center. Am Surg 80:261–269PubMedPubMedCentral Davies SW, Gillen JR, Guidry CA, Newhook TE, Pope NH, Hranjec T, Sawyer RG, Hallowell PT (2014) A comparative analysis between laparoscopic and open adhesiolysis at a tertiary care center. Am Surg 80:261–269PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis decrease the risk of recurrent symptoms in small bowel obstruction? A propensity score-matched analysis
Authors
Siyuan Yao
Eiji Tanaka
Yugo Matsui
Atsushi Ikeda
Teppei Murakami
Tatsuo Okumoto
Takehisa Harada
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5615-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017 Go to the issue