Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017

01-12-2017

Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis

Authors: Alberto Biondi, Pietro Santocchi, Francesco Pennestrì, Francesco Santullo, Domenico D’Ugo, Roberto Persiani

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study is to compare short- and long-term outcomes of totally laparoscopic right colectomy (TLRC) and laparoscopically assisted right colectomy (LARC), using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy between January 2006 and July 2016 was conducted. PSM analysis was performed to overcome patient selection bias between the two surgical techniques.

Results

A total of 116 patients were reviewed. After PSM, 54 patients for the TLRC group and 54 patients for the LARC group were compared. TLRC was associated with shorter post-operative hospital stay (6.81 vs. 4.79 days; p < 0.001) with no difference in 30-day morbidity and mortality. A lower incidence of long-term incisional hernia was observed in the TLRC group (1.9 vs. 21.2%; p = 0.002). TLRC showed better oncological accuracy as demonstrated by a greater number of lymph node achieved (19.21 vs. 15.19; p = 0.001) and higher vascular pedicle length (131.81 vs. 114.76 mm; p = 0.014).

Discussion

TLRC is a safe and feasible technique with similar results of LARC in terms of short-term morbidity and mortality. Major advantages related to TLRC are represented by shorter post-operative hospital stay and lower incidence of long-term incisional hernias. Further investigations are needed to assess the oncological outcomes for this technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Parés D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12CrossRefPubMed Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Parés D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic hemicolectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRefPubMed Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic hemicolectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure. Ann Surg 256:462–468CrossRefPubMed Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure. Ann Surg 256:462–468CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating in the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767CrossRefPubMed Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating in the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosic: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRefPubMed Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosic: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fabozzi M, Cirillo P, Corcione F (2016) Surgical approach to right colon cancer: from open technique to robot. State of art. World J Gastrointest Surg 27(8):564–573CrossRef Fabozzi M, Cirillo P, Corcione F (2016) Surgical approach to right colon cancer: from open technique to robot. State of art. World J Gastrointest Surg 27(8):564–573CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424CrossRef Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heinze G, Juni P (2011) An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Eur Heart J 32:1704–1708CrossRefPubMed Heinze G, Juni P (2011) An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses. Eur Heart J 32:1704–1708CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Austin PC (2009) The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measure covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Mak 29(6):661–677CrossRef Austin PC (2009) The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measure covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Med Decis Mak 29(6):661–677CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classifications of surgical complications. Five-years experiences. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classifications of surgical complications. Five-years experiences. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP, Napolitano C, Angiolini MR, Bracale U, Clemente M, D’ambra M, Luglio G, Musella M, Pace U, Rosati R, Milone F (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2314–2320CrossRefPubMed Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP, Napolitano C, Angiolini MR, Bracale U, Clemente M, D’ambra M, Luglio G, Musella M, Pace U, Rosati R, Milone F (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2314–2320CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gullà N, Mariani E, Bistoni G, Noya G (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studied. Colorectal Dis 14:447–469CrossRef Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gullà N, Mariani E, Bistoni G, Noya G (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studied. Colorectal Dis 14:447–469CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 5:675–679CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, Burke M, Reed JF 3rd, Arnaud JP (2008) Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1350–1355CrossRefPubMed Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, Burke M, Reed JF 3rd, Arnaud JP (2008) Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1350–1355CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Facy O, De Magistris L, Poulain V, Goergen M, Orlando G, Azagra JS (2013) Right colectomy: value of the totally laparoscopic approach. J Visc Surg 150:207–212CrossRefPubMed Facy O, De Magistris L, Poulain V, Goergen M, Orlando G, Azagra JS (2013) Right colectomy: value of the totally laparoscopic approach. J Visc Surg 150:207–212CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas AP, Blumberg D (2006) Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon? Surgery 140:675–683CrossRefPubMed Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas AP, Blumberg D (2006) Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon? Surgery 140:675–683CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMedPubMedCentral Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Feroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908CrossRefPubMed Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Borrelli A, Andan G, Lenzi E, Feroci F (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891CrossRefPubMed Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24:1886–1891CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Stein SA, Bergamaschi R (2013) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 17:S35–S39CrossRefPubMed Stein SA, Bergamaschi R (2013) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 17:S35–S39CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2013) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27:1730–1736CrossRefPubMed Chang K, Fakhoury M, Barnajian M, Tarta C, Bergamaschi R (2013) Laparoscopic right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 27:1730–1736CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L, Sarna S, Hatib K, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefit in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829CrossRefPubMed Shapiro R, Keler U, Segev L, Sarna S, Hatib K, Hazzan D (2016) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: short- and long-term benefit in comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30:3823–3829CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036CrossRefPubMed DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25:1031–1036CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Barnett RB, Clement GS, Drizin GS, Josselson AS, Prince DS (1992) Pulmonary changes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:125–127CrossRefPubMed Barnett RB, Clement GS, Drizin GS, Josselson AS, Prince DS (1992) Pulmonary changes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:125–127CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Totally laparoscopic right colectomy versus laparoscopically assisted right colectomy: a propensity score analysis
Authors
Alberto Biondi
Pietro Santocchi
Francesco Pennestrì
Francesco Santullo
Domenico D’Ugo
Roberto Persiani
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5601-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017 Go to the issue