Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017

01-12-2017

A comparison between totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy and scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation for pediatric cord hydrocele

Authors: Byung Seo Choi, Geon Young Byun, Seong Bae Hwang, Bum Hwan Koo, Sung Ryul Lee

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to report clinical characteristics and to investigate the feasibility and safety of totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy (TLH) compared to scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation (SIH) for pediatric cord hydrocele (CH).

Methods

From September 2011 to February 2016, 148 patients underwent SIH, and 342 patients underwent TLH for CH. In the TLH group, a large hydrocele that could not pass through the internal ring was removed after percutaneous syringe aspiration. Age, laterality of hydrocele, inguinal comorbidities, operation time, surgical complications, and recurrences were evaluated.

Results

All the patients had spermatic cord cysts and patent processus vaginalis in proximity to hydrocele (mixed type). The mean age of CH patients was 34.1 ± 22.1 months. CHs are more common on the right side (61.0%) than on the left (35.7%). Bilaterality occurred in 3.3%. Comorbidities such as hernia (8.6%) and cryptorchidism (1.2%) were observed. There were no complications except for two cases of wound hematoma in SIH group. There was one (0.7%) case of recurrence appeared in communicating hydrocele in SIH group. There were no significant differences in the age, laterality of hydrocele, inguinal comorbidities, operation time, complications, and recurrences between TLH and SIH groups. However, TLH for unilateral cord hydrocele had significantly shorter operation time compared to SIH. The mean operation time in TLH group was 15.6 ± 5.96 min and there was no conversion to open surgery.

Conclusions

TLH for pediatric CH is a feasible and safe procedure without additional incisions. Therefore, TLH can be one of the surgical options for pediatric CH especially in mixed type.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Martin LC, Share JC, Peters C, Atala A (1996) Hydrocele of the spermatic cord: embryology and ultrasonographic appearance. Pediatr Radiol 26:528–530CrossRefPubMed Martin LC, Share JC, Peters C, Atala A (1996) Hydrocele of the spermatic cord: embryology and ultrasonographic appearance. Pediatr Radiol 26:528–530CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wilson JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, Baskin LS (2008) Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? J Urol 180:1724–1727 discussion 1727-1728 CrossRefPubMed Wilson JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, Baskin LS (2008) Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? J Urol 180:1724–1727 discussion 1727-1728 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lao OB, Fitzgibbons RJ, Cusick RA (2012) Pediatric inguinal hernias, hydroceles, and undescended testicles. Surg Clin North Am 92:487–504CrossRefPubMed Lao OB, Fitzgibbons RJ, Cusick RA (2012) Pediatric inguinal hernias, hydroceles, and undescended testicles. Surg Clin North Am 92:487–504CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schier F (2006) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1081–1084CrossRefPubMed Schier F (2006) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg 41:1081–1084CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Saranga Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V (2008) Minimal access surgery of pediatric inguinal hernias: a review. Surg Endosc 22:1751–1762CrossRefPubMed Saranga Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V (2008) Minimal access surgery of pediatric inguinal hernias: a review. Surg Endosc 22:1751–1762CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Janetschek G, Reissigl A, Bartsch G (1994) Laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydroceles. J Endourol 8:415–417CrossRefPubMed Janetschek G, Reissigl A, Bartsch G (1994) Laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydroceles. J Endourol 8:415–417CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A (2006) Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:980–986CrossRefPubMed Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A (2006) Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:980–986CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chang YT, Lee JY, Wang JY, Chiou CS, Chang CC (2010) Hydrocele of the spermatic cord in infants and children: its particular characteristics. Urology 76:82–86CrossRefPubMed Chang YT, Lee JY, Wang JY, Chiou CS, Chang CC (2010) Hydrocele of the spermatic cord in infants and children: its particular characteristics. Urology 76:82–86CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saka R, Okuyama H, Sasaki T, Nose S, Yoneyama C, Tsukada R (2014) Laparoscopic treatment of pediatric hydrocele and the evaluation of the internal inguinal ring. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:664–668CrossRefPubMed Saka R, Okuyama H, Sasaki T, Nose S, Yoneyama C, Tsukada R (2014) Laparoscopic treatment of pediatric hydrocele and the evaluation of the internal inguinal ring. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24:664–668CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lau ST, Lee YH, Caty MG (2007) Current management of hernias and hydroceles. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:50–57CrossRefPubMed Lau ST, Lee YH, Caty MG (2007) Current management of hernias and hydroceles. Semin Pediatr Surg 16:50–57CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Group IPE (2010) IPEG Guidelines for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:10–14 Group IPE (2010) IPEG Guidelines for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:10–14
12.
go back to reference Naji H, Ingolfsson I, Isacson D, Svensson JF (2012) Decision making in the management of hydroceles in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr 171:807–810CrossRefPubMed Naji H, Ingolfsson I, Isacson D, Svensson JF (2012) Decision making in the management of hydroceles in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr 171:807–810CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang Z, Xu L, Chen Z, Yao C, Su Z (2014) Modified single-port minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal repair for pediatric hydrocele: a single-center experience with 279 surgeries. World J Urol 32:1613–1618CrossRefPubMed Wang Z, Xu L, Chen Z, Yao C, Su Z (2014) Modified single-port minilaparoscopic extraperitoneal repair for pediatric hydrocele: a single-center experience with 279 surgeries. World J Urol 32:1613–1618CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schier F, Montupet P, Esposito C (2002) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children: a three-center experience with 933 repairs. J Pediatr Surg 37:395–397CrossRefPubMed Schier F, Montupet P, Esposito C (2002) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children: a three-center experience with 933 repairs. J Pediatr Surg 37:395–397CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yang XD, Wu Y, Xiang B, Wong K, Pei J, Li FY (2015) Ten year experience of laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydrocele and the long-term follow-up results. J Pediatr Surg 50:1987–1990CrossRefPubMed Yang XD, Wu Y, Xiang B, Wong K, Pei J, Li FY (2015) Ten year experience of laparoscopic repair of pediatric hydrocele and the long-term follow-up results. J Pediatr Surg 50:1987–1990CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Peng Y, Li C, Lin W, Xu L (2015) Application of a laparoscopic, single-port, double-needle technique for pediatric hydroceles with multiple peritoneal folds: a trial from a single-center 5-year experience. Urology 85:1466–1470CrossRefPubMed Peng Y, Li C, Lin W, Xu L (2015) Application of a laparoscopic, single-port, double-needle technique for pediatric hydroceles with multiple peritoneal folds: a trial from a single-center 5-year experience. Urology 85:1466–1470CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A comparison between totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy and scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation for pediatric cord hydrocele
Authors
Byung Seo Choi
Geon Young Byun
Seong Bae Hwang
Bum Hwan Koo
Sung Ryul Lee
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5582-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017 Go to the issue