Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2017

01-11-2017

Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Somashekar G. Krishna, Bhavana B. Rao, Emmanuel Ugbarugba, Zarine K. Shah, Alecia Blaszczak, Alice Hinton, Darwin L. Conwell, Phil A. Hart

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis in part due to delayed diagnosis. Even with advances in cross-sectional imaging, small pancreatic malignancies can be missed. We sought to determine the performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in those without an obvious mass on multi-detector CT scan (MDCT), but with clinical suspicion for pancreatic malignancy.

Methods

Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic performance of EUS after negative or inconclusive pancreatic protocol MDCT for detection of pancreatic malignancy when clinically suspected. A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria. The point estimates in each study were compared to the summary pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity with the aid of forest plots. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were employed to evaluate possible publication bias.

Results

EUS-guided fine needle aspiration was performed in all studies. EUS was performed in 206 subjects with a clinical suspicion of a pancreatic mass but with an indeterminate MDCT. A pancreatic mass (mean size 21 ± 1.2 mm) was identified in 70% (n = 144) of the subjects, and 42.2% (n = 87) were diagnosed with PDAC. The pooled estimates of EUS for diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of an indeterminate MDCT were a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 69–94%), specificity of 58% (95% CI 40–74%), positive predictive value of 77% (69–84%), negative predictive value of 66% (95% CI 53–77%), and an accuracy of 75% (95% CI 67–82). The summary area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95% CI 0.52–0.89). The funnel plots and Egger’s test did not show a significant publication bias.

Conclusions

The yield of EUS is comparatively higher for the diagnosis of a pancreatic malignancy in patients with suspected cancer, but a non-diagnostic MDCT. Importantly, the majority of the lesions missed on CT represent PDAC, in which early diagnosis is essential.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Pannala R, Leibson CL, Rabe KG, Timmons LJ, Ransom J, de Andrade M, Petersen GM, Chari ST (2009) Temporal association of changes in fasting blood glucose and body mass index with diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2318–2325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pannala R, Leibson CL, Rabe KG, Timmons LJ, Ransom J, de Andrade M, Petersen GM, Chari ST (2009) Temporal association of changes in fasting blood glucose and body mass index with diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2318–2325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wang W, Shpaner A, Krishna SG, Ross WA, Bhutani MS, Tamm EP, Raju GS, Xiao L, Wolff RA, Fleming JB, Lee JH (2013) Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT. Gastrointest Endosc 78:73–80CrossRefPubMed Wang W, Shpaner A, Krishna SG, Ross WA, Bhutani MS, Tamm EP, Raju GS, Xiao L, Wolff RA, Fleming JB, Lee JH (2013) Use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm without a definitive mass on CT. Gastrointest Endosc 78:73–80CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Deerenberg EB, Poley JW, Hermans JJ, Ganesh S, van der Harst E, van Eijck CH (2011) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients suspected of pancreatic cancer with negative helical MDCT scan. Dig Surg 28:398–403CrossRefPubMed Deerenberg EB, Poley JW, Hermans JJ, Ganesh S, van der Harst E, van Eijck CH (2011) Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients suspected of pancreatic cancer with negative helical MDCT scan. Dig Surg 28:398–403CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Meijer OL, Weersma RK, van der Jagt EJ, van Dullemen HM (2010) Endoscopic ultrasonography in suspected pancreatic malignancy and indecisive CT. Neth J Med 68:360–364PubMed Meijer OL, Weersma RK, van der Jagt EJ, van Dullemen HM (2010) Endoscopic ultrasonography in suspected pancreatic malignancy and indecisive CT. Neth J Med 68:360–364PubMed
7.
go back to reference Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99:844–850CrossRefPubMed Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99:844–850CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, Kamel IR, Schulick R, Zhang Z, Topazian M, Takahashi N, Fletcher J, Petersen G, Klein AP, Axilbund J, Griffin C, Syngal S, Saltzman JR, Mortele KJ, Lee J, Tamm E, Vikram R, Bhosale P, Margolis D, Farrell J, Goggins M, American Cancer of the Pancreas Screening C (2012) Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology 142:796–804 (quiz e714–795)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, Kamel IR, Schulick R, Zhang Z, Topazian M, Takahashi N, Fletcher J, Petersen G, Klein AP, Axilbund J, Griffin C, Syngal S, Saltzman JR, Mortele KJ, Lee J, Tamm E, Vikram R, Bhosale P, Margolis D, Farrell J, Goggins M, American Cancer of the Pancreas Screening C (2012) Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology 142:796–804 (quiz e714–795)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Systematic Reviews beyond the Basics, Ottowa Hospital Research Institute Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Systematic Reviews beyond the Basics, Ottowa Hospital Research Institute
11.
go back to reference Tamm EP, Loyer EM, Faria SC, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C (2007) Retrospective analysis of dual-phase MDCT and follow-up EUS/EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Abdom Imaging 32:660–667CrossRefPubMed Tamm EP, Loyer EM, Faria SC, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C (2007) Retrospective analysis of dual-phase MDCT and follow-up EUS/EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Abdom Imaging 32:660–667CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141:753–763CrossRefPubMed DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S (2004) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 141:753–763CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Singh S, Reddymasu S, Waheed S, Vail M, He J, Talapaneni J, Olyaee M (2008) Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with non-specific changes of the pancreas on computed tomography: a single-center experience. Dig Dis Sci 53:2799–2804CrossRefPubMed Singh S, Reddymasu S, Waheed S, Vail M, He J, Talapaneni J, Olyaee M (2008) Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with non-specific changes of the pancreas on computed tomography: a single-center experience. Dig Dis Sci 53:2799–2804CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Horwhat JD, Gerke H, Acosta RD, Pavey DA, Jowell PS (2009) Focal or diffuse “fullness” of the pancreas on CT. Usually benign, but EUS plus/minus FNA is warranted to identify malignancy. JOP 10:37–42PubMed Horwhat JD, Gerke H, Acosta RD, Pavey DA, Jowell PS (2009) Focal or diffuse “fullness” of the pancreas on CT. Usually benign, but EUS plus/minus FNA is warranted to identify malignancy. JOP 10:37–42PubMed
15.
go back to reference Reddymasu SC, Gupta N, Singh S, Oropeza-Vail M, Jafri SF, Olyaee M (2011) Pancreato-biliary malignancy diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography in absence of a mass lesion on transabdominal imaging: prevalence and predictors. Dig Dis Sci 56:1912–1916CrossRefPubMed Reddymasu SC, Gupta N, Singh S, Oropeza-Vail M, Jafri SF, Olyaee M (2011) Pancreato-biliary malignancy diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography in absence of a mass lesion on transabdominal imaging: prevalence and predictors. Dig Dis Sci 56:1912–1916CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Network NCC (2016) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Network NCC (2016) Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®)
17.
go back to reference Wasif N, Ko CY, Farrell J, Wainberg Z, Hines OJ, Reber H, Tomlinson JS (2010) Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging? Ann Surg Oncol 17:2312–2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wasif N, Ko CY, Farrell J, Wainberg Z, Hines OJ, Reber H, Tomlinson JS (2010) Impact of tumor grade on prognosis in pancreatic cancer: should we include grade in AJCC staging? Ann Surg Oncol 17:2312–2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference DeWitt J, Yu M, Al-Haddad MA, Sherman S, McHenry L, Leblanc JK (2010) Survival in patients with pancreatic cancer after the diagnosis of malignant ascites or liver metastases by EUS-FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 71:260–265CrossRefPubMed DeWitt J, Yu M, Al-Haddad MA, Sherman S, McHenry L, Leblanc JK (2010) Survival in patients with pancreatic cancer after the diagnosis of malignant ascites or liver metastases by EUS-FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 71:260–265CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee YT, Ng EK, Hung LC, Chung SC, Ching JY, Chan WY, Chu WC, Sung JJ (2005) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients. Gut 54:1541–1545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee YT, Ng EK, Hung LC, Chung SC, Ching JY, Chan WY, Chu WC, Sung JJ (2005) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients. Gut 54:1541–1545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Singh P, Mukhopadhyay P, Bhatt B, Patel T, Kiss A, Gupta R, Bhat S, Erickson RA (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound versus CT scan for detection of the metastases to the liver: results of a prospective comparative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:367–373CrossRefPubMed Singh P, Mukhopadhyay P, Bhatt B, Patel T, Kiss A, Gupta R, Bhat S, Erickson RA (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound versus CT scan for detection of the metastases to the liver: results of a prospective comparative study. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:367–373CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference DeWitt J, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, McGreevy K, Sherman S (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:609–615CrossRefPubMed DeWitt J, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, McGreevy K, Sherman S (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:609–615CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ngamruengphong S, Swanson KM, Shah ND, Wallace MB (2015) Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration does not impair survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gut 64:1105–1110CrossRefPubMed Ngamruengphong S, Swanson KM, Shah ND, Wallace MB (2015) Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration does not impair survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gut 64:1105–1110CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli RD, Baron TH, Faigel DO, Asge (2005) ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 61:8–12CrossRefPubMed Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli RD, Baron TH, Faigel DO, Asge (2005) ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 61:8–12CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tamm EP, Loyer EM, Faria S, Raut CP, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Dubrow RA, Charnsangavej C (2006) Staging of pancreatic cancer with multidetector CT in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Abdom Imaging 31:568–574CrossRefPubMed Tamm EP, Loyer EM, Faria S, Raut CP, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Dubrow RA, Charnsangavej C (2006) Staging of pancreatic cancer with multidetector CT in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Abdom Imaging 31:568–574CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H, Choi H, David C, DuBrow RA, Broemeling LD, Cleary KR, Charnsangavej C (2004) Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:619–623CrossRefPubMed Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H, Choi H, David C, DuBrow RA, Broemeling LD, Cleary KR, Charnsangavej C (2004) Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:619–623CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Faria SC, Tamm EP, DuBrow R, David C, Loyer E, Herron D, Sawaf Y, Ball G, Silverman PM, Charnsangavej C (2004) Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Abdom Imaging 29:231–238CrossRefPubMed Faria SC, Tamm EP, DuBrow R, David C, Loyer E, Herron D, Sawaf Y, Ball G, Silverman PM, Charnsangavej C (2004) Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Abdom Imaging 29:231–238CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Harinck F, Konings IC, Kluijt I, Poley JW, van Hooft JE, van Dullemen HM, Nio CY, Krak NC, Hermans JJ, Aalfs CM, Wagner A, Sijmons RH, Biermann K, van Eijck CH, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Bruno MJ, Dutch Research Group on Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-risk i (2015) A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Gut 65:1505–1513CrossRefPubMed Harinck F, Konings IC, Kluijt I, Poley JW, van Hooft JE, van Dullemen HM, Nio CY, Krak NC, Hermans JJ, Aalfs CM, Wagner A, Sijmons RH, Biermann K, van Eijck CH, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Bruno MJ, Dutch Research Group on Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-risk i (2015) A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Gut 65:1505–1513CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Somashekar G. Krishna
Bhavana B. Rao
Emmanuel Ugbarugba
Zarine K. Shah
Alecia Blaszczak
Alice Hinton
Darwin L. Conwell
Phil A. Hart
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5516-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2017 Go to the issue