Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017

01-08-2017

Hands-on 2.0: improving transfer of training via the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT) program

Authors: Jonathan Dort, Amber Trickey, John Paige, Erin Schwarz, Brian Dunkin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Practicing surgeons commonly learn new procedures and techniques by attending a “hands-on” course, though trainings are often ineffective at promoting subsequent procedure adoption in practice. We describe implementation of a new program with the SAGES All Things Hernia Hands-On Course, Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT), which employs standardized, proven teaching techniques, and 1-year mentorship. Attendee confidence and procedure adoption are compared between standard and ADOPT programs.

Methods

For the pilot ADOPT course implementation, a hands-on course focusing on abdominal wall hernia repair was chosen. ADOPT participants were recruited among enrollees for the standard Hands-On Hernia Course. Enrollment in ADOPT was capped at 10 participants and limited to a 2:1 student-to-faculty ratio, compared to the standard course 22 participants with a 4:1 student-to-faculty ratio. ADOPT mentors interacted with participants through webinars, phone conferences, and continuous email availability throughout the year. All participants were asked to provide pre- and post-course surveys inquiring about the number of targeted hernia procedures performed and related confidence level.

Results

Four of 10 ADOPT participants (40%) and six of 22 standard training participants (27%) returned questionnaires. Over the 3 months following the course, ADOPT participants performed more ventral hernia mesh insertion procedures than standard training participants (median 13 vs. 0.5, p = 0.010) and considerably more total combined procedures (median 26 vs. 7, p = 0.054). Compared to standard training, learners who participated in ADOPT reported greater confidence improvements in employing a components separation via an open approach (p = 0.051), and performing an open transversus abdominis release, though the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.14).

Discussion

These results suggest that the ADOPT program, with standardized and structured teaching, telementoring, and a longitudinal educational approach, is effective and leads to better transfer of learned skills and procedures to clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robinson DH, Toledo AH (2012) Historical development of modern anesthesia. J Invest Surg 25:141–149CrossRefPubMed Robinson DH, Toledo AH (2012) Historical development of modern anesthesia. J Invest Surg 25:141–149CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gariepy TP (1994) The introduction and acceptance of Listerian antisepsis in the United States. J Hist Med Allied Sci 49:167–206CrossRefPubMed Gariepy TP (1994) The introduction and acceptance of Listerian antisepsis in the United States. J Hist Med Allied Sci 49:167–206CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kelley WE (2008) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12:351–357PubMedPubMedCentral Kelley WE (2008) The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS 12:351–357PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRefPubMed Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M (2013) Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2253–2257CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Paige JT, Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2013) Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee. Surg Endosc 27(12):4429–4438CrossRefPubMed Paige JT, Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2013) Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee. Surg Endosc 27(12):4429–4438CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Paige JT, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2012) Practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery (2011): a report from the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee. Surg Endosc 26(12):3367–3381CrossRefPubMed Farrell TM, Bergman S, Selim N, Paige JT, Harzman AE, Schwarz E, Hori Y, Levine J, Scott DJ (2012) Practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery (2011): a report from the Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee. Surg Endosc 26(12):3367–3381CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91(12):1549–1558CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Langsford L, Anderson J, Thomas-Gibson S, Valori R, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Francis N (2015) Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England. Ann Surg 261(1):149–156CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Langsford L, Anderson J, Thomas-Gibson S, Valori R, Hanna GB, Coleman MG, Francis N (2015) Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England. Ann Surg 261(1):149–156CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Payne SC, Huffman AH (2005) A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad Manag J 48(1):158–168CrossRef Payne SC, Huffman AH (2005) A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad Manag J 48(1):158–168CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sinclair P, Fitzgerald JE, Hornby ST, Shalhoub J (2015) Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery. World J Surg 39(2):303–313CrossRefPubMed Sinclair P, Fitzgerald JE, Hornby ST, Shalhoub J (2015) Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery. World J Surg 39(2):303–313CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Entezami P, Franzblau LE, Chung KC (2012) Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand 7(1):30–36CrossRefPubMed Entezami P, Franzblau LE, Chung KC (2012) Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review. Hand 7(1):30–36CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Kent SA, Lefebvre KL, McCune ML, Jayaraman S (2009) A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1634–1638CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Kent SA, Lefebvre KL, McCune ML, Jayaraman S (2009) A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1634–1638CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK, Jayaraman S (2010) Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 24(4):841–844CrossRefPubMed Schlachta CM, Lefebvre KL, Sorsdahl AK, Jayaraman S (2010) Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 24(4):841–844CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2006) The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20(9):1389–1393CrossRef Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A, Hegge S, McKinley C, Anvari M (2006) The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 20(9):1389–1393CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hands-on 2.0: improving transfer of training via the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Acquisition of Data for Outcomes and Procedure Transfer (ADOPT) program
Authors
Jonathan Dort
Amber Trickey
John Paige
Erin Schwarz
Brian Dunkin
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5366-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017 Go to the issue