Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017

01-08-2017

Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?

Authors: Robert Wang, Zhe Liang, Ahmed M. Zihni, Shuddhadeb Ray, Michael M. Awad

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is increasing awareness of potential ergonomic challenges experienced by the laparoscopic surgeon. The purpose of this study is to quantify and compare the ergonomic stress experienced by a surgeon while performing open versus laparoscopic portions of a procedure. We hypothesize that a surgeon will experience greater ergonomic stress when performing laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

We designed a study to measure upper-body muscle activation during the laparoscopic and open portions of sigmoid colectomies in a single surgeon. A sample of five cases was recorded over a two-month time span. Each case contained significant portions of laparoscopic and open surgery. We obtained whole-case electromyography (EMG) tracings from bilateral biceps, triceps, deltoid, and trapezius muscles. After normalization to a maximum voltage of contraction (%MVC), these EMG tracings were used to calculate average muscle activation during the open and laparoscopic segments of each procedure. Paired Student’s t test was used to compare the average muscle activation between the two groups (*p < 0.05 considered statistically significant).

Results

Significant reductions in mean muscle activation in laparoscopic compared to open procedures were noted for the left triceps (4.07 ± 0.44% open vs. 2.65 ± 0.54% lap, 35% reduction), left deltoid (2.43 ± 0.45% open vs. 1.32 ± 0.16% lap, 46% reduction), left trapezius (9.93 ± 0.1.95% open vs. 4.61 ± 0.67% lap, 54% reduction), right triceps (2.94 ± 0.62% open vs. 1.85 ± 0.28% lap, 37% reduction), and right trapezius (10.20 ± 2.12% open vs. 4.69 ± 1.18% lap, 54% reduction).

Conclusions

Contrary to our hypothesis, the laparoscopic approach provided ergonomic benefit in several upper-body muscle groups compared to the open approach. This may be due to the greater reach of laparoscopic instruments and camera in the lower abdomen/pelvis. Patient body habitus may also have less of an effect in the laparoscopic compared to open approach. Future studies with multiple subjects and different types of procedures are planned to further investigate these findings.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, Graham TO, Slivka A, Lee KK, Schraut WH, Luketich JD (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 176:659–665CrossRefPubMed Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, McLaughlin RH, Graham TO, Slivka A, Lee KK, Schraut WH, Luketich JD (1998) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia. Am J Surg 176:659–665CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rashid AM, Nazir SM, Kakroo SMM, Chalkoo MAM, Razvi SAM, Wani AAM (2013) Laparoscopic interval appendectomy versus open interval appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech Febr 23:93–96. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e318277df6a CrossRef Rashid AM, Nazir SM, Kakroo SMM, Chalkoo MAM, Razvi SAM, Wani AAM (2013) Laparoscopic interval appendectomy versus open interval appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech Febr 23:93–96. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e318277df6a​ CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484. doi:10.​1016/​S1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11:139–142CrossRefPubMed Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11:139–142CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
21.
go back to reference Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Klein R, Park A (2007) Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: a review of tasks, models, and measurement systems. Surg Innov 14(3):153–167CrossRefPubMed Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Klein R, Park A (2007) Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: a review of tasks, models, and measurement systems. Surg Innov 14(3):153–167CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28(2):456–465. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z Epub 2013 Oct 3 CrossRefPubMed Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28(2):456–465. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-3213-z Epub 2013 Oct 3 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Which causes more ergonomic stress: Laparoscopic or open surgery?
Authors
Robert Wang
Zhe Liang
Ahmed M. Zihni
Shuddhadeb Ray
Michael M. Awad
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5360-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017 Go to the issue