Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017

01-04-2017

Learning curve of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax

Authors: Hee Chul Yang, Sohee Kim, Sungwon Yum, Sukki Cho, Kwhanmien Kim, Sanghoon Jheon

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery (SITS) requires extensive time and practice to achieve satisfactory technical skills. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curves of SITS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP).

Methods

This study included a total of 274 consecutive patients who underwent PSP surgery by a single operator between May 2011 and February 2014. During this period, SITS was applied as a routine approach. Learning curves were made by the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method using the number of cases and four surgical technique-related factors, including operation time, postoperative complication, non-SITS rate, and ipsilateral PSP recurrence.

Results

Among the 274 patients, 16 patients who were presented with a previous 3-port wound scar or inadequate chest tube site before surgery were not eligible for SITS. Hence, SITS was attempted on 258 patients and performed successfully in 251 patients. For these successful SITS patients, the mean age was 22.9 ± 8.1 years, the mean operation time was 65.6 ± 22.2 min, the mean chest tube indwelling time was 1.5 ± 1.1 days, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.7 ± 1.1 days. The mean operation time decreased from 84.0 to 47.6 min when a comparison was made between patients operated in the initial 6 months and the last 6 months of the study period. As revealed by the CUSUM technique, more than 50 % of the cases experienced an operation time of <70 min after the first 92 cases. After 57 cases, the postoperative complication rate was maintained at <5 %. The non-SITS rate was achieved to be lower than 5 % after 112 cases. The ipsilateral PSP recurrence rate was maintained at below 8 % after 102 cases.

Conclusions

Although PSP is the most applicable scenario for the beginner of SITS, at least 100 cases of experience are needed to achieve optimal technical level.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ng CS, Rocco G, Wong RH, Lau RW, Yu SC, Yim AP (2014) Uniportal and single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery: the state of the art. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19(4):661–666CrossRefPubMed Ng CS, Rocco G, Wong RH, Lau RW, Yu SC, Yim AP (2014) Uniportal and single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery: the state of the art. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 19(4):661–666CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sihoe AD (2014) The evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: implications for the practice of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 6:604–617 Sihoe AD (2014) The evolution of minimally invasive thoracic surgery: implications for the practice of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis 6:604–617
3.
go back to reference Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G (2005) Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:43–46CrossRefPubMed Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G (2005) Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:43–46CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A, Sabbatini A (2008) Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 7:63–66CrossRefPubMed Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A, Sabbatini A (2008) Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 7:63–66CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Song IH, Yum S, Choi W, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, Yang HC (2014) Clinical application of single incision thoracoscopic surgery: early experience of 264 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg 9:44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song IH, Yum S, Choi W, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, Yang HC (2014) Clinical application of single incision thoracoscopic surgery: early experience of 264 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg 9:44CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kang do K, Min HK, Jun HJ, Hwang YH, Kang MK (2014) Early outcomes of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47:384–388CrossRefPubMed Kang do K, Min HK, Jun HJ, Hwang YH, Kang MK (2014) Early outcomes of single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 47:384–388CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S (2013) Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery. Surg Endosc 27:139–145CrossRefPubMed Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S (2013) Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery. Surg Endosc 27:139–145CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yamazaki K, Haratake N, Shikada Y, Mori R, Kouso H, Shoji F, Takeo S (2015) Initial experience of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for 100 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21:513–516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamazaki K, Haratake N, Shikada Y, Mori R, Kouso H, Shoji F, Takeo S (2015) Initial experience of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for 100 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 21:513–516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of Surgical Complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of Surgical Complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77:583–586CrossRefPubMed Yap CH, Colson ME, Watters DA (2007) Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. ANZ J Surg 77:583–586CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E (2004) Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thoracic Surg 77:726–728CrossRef Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E (2004) Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thoracic Surg 77:726–728CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen CH, Lee SY, Chang H, Liu HC, Hung TT, Chen CH (2012) The adequacy of single-incisional thoracoscopic surgery as a first-line endoscopic approach for the management of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 7:99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen CH, Lee SY, Chang H, Liu HC, Hung TT, Chen CH (2012) The adequacy of single-incisional thoracoscopic surgery as a first-line endoscopic approach for the management of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg 7:99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Park JS, Han WS, Kim HK, Choi YS (2012) Pleural abrasion for mechanical pleurodesis in surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: is it effective? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:62–64CrossRefPubMed Park JS, Han WS, Kim HK, Choi YS (2012) Pleural abrasion for mechanical pleurodesis in surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: is it effective? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:62–64CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Min X, Huang Y, Yang Y, Chen Y, Cui J, Wang C, Huang Y, Liu J, Wang J (2014) Mechanical pleurodesis does not reduce recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1790–1796CrossRefPubMed Min X, Huang Y, Yang Y, Chen Y, Cui J, Wang C, Huang Y, Liu J, Wang J (2014) Mechanical pleurodesis does not reduce recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1790–1796CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee S, Kim HR, Cho S, Huh DM, Lee EB, Ryu KM, Cho DG, Paik HC, Kim DK, Lee SH, Cho JS, Lee JI, Choi H, Kim K, Jheon S, Korean Pneumothorax Study G (2014) Staple line coverage after bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 98:2005–2011CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Kim HR, Cho S, Huh DM, Lee EB, Ryu KM, Cho DG, Paik HC, Kim DK, Lee SH, Cho JS, Lee JI, Choi H, Kim K, Jheon S, Korean Pneumothorax Study G (2014) Staple line coverage after bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 98:2005–2011CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, Mendez L, Fernandez R, de la Torre M (2013) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 5(Suppl 3):234–245 Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, Mendez L, Fernandez R, de la Torre M (2013) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 5(Suppl 3):234–245
18.
go back to reference Yang HC, Lee JY, Ahn S, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, Kim JS (2015) Pain control of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection: is pre-emptive local bupivacaine injection able to replace the intravenous patient controlled analgesia? J Thorac Dis 7:1960–1969PubMedPubMedCentral Yang HC, Lee JY, Ahn S, Cho S, Kim K, Jheon S, Kim JS (2015) Pain control of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection: is pre-emptive local bupivacaine injection able to replace the intravenous patient controlled analgesia? J Thorac Dis 7:1960–1969PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Zhao H, Bu L, Yang F, Li J, Li Y, Wang J (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve. World J Surg 34:2368–2372CrossRefPubMed Zhao H, Bu L, Yang F, Li J, Li Y, Wang J (2010) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve. World J Surg 34:2368–2372CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McKenna RJ Jr (2008) Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:275–280CrossRefPubMed McKenna RJ Jr (2008) Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:275–280CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Melfi FM, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thoracic surgery clinics 18:289–295CrossRefPubMed Melfi FM, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thoracic surgery clinics 18:289–295CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Viti A, Terzi A (2013) Geometrical characteristics of uniportal VATS. J Thorac Dis 5(Suppl 3):214–216 Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Viti A, Terzi A (2013) Geometrical characteristics of uniportal VATS. J Thorac Dis 5(Suppl 3):214–216
23.
go back to reference Rocco G (2012) One-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracic surgical resections–a clear advance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:27–31CrossRef Rocco G (2012) One-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracic surgical resections–a clear advance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:27–31CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Castro C, Smith S, Alqassis A, Ketterl T, Sun Y, Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Savage PP, Gitlin RD (2012) MARVEL: a wireless miniature anchored robotic videoscope for expedited laparoscopy. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference 2926–2931 Castro C, Smith S, Alqassis A, Ketterl T, Sun Y, Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Savage PP, Gitlin RD (2012) MARVEL: a wireless miniature anchored robotic videoscope for expedited laparoscopy. Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE International Conference 2926–2931
Metadata
Title
Learning curve of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax
Authors
Hee Chul Yang
Sohee Kim
Sungwon Yum
Sukki Cho
Kwhanmien Kim
Sanghoon Jheon
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5158-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017 Go to the issue