Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Dynamic Manuscript

Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes

Authors: Tommaso Simoncini, Eleonora Russo, Paolo Mannella, Andrea Giannini

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Abdominal sacral hystero-cervicopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for the treatment of apical prolapse, but requires advanced laparoscopic skills and exposes to potentially life-threatening complications. Lateral apical suspension to the abdominal wall with mesh is a feasible alternative of ASC where robotic assistance may offer specific advantages. We here describe the surgical technique and the short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted lateral apical suspension (R-ALS) with the use of a titan-covered T-shaped mesh.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients with stage III or IV symptomatic anterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse underwent R-ALS between September 2014 and September 2015.

Results

R-ALS was completed without complications in all cases with a mean operative time of 117 ± 26 min. From a technical standpoint, robotic assistance allowed for an extremely reproducible technique, with a swift learning curve and consistent length of the surgical steps. The procedure was extremely well tolerated and resulted in complete resolution of POP-associated symptoms and in improvements of POP- and incontinence-related quality-of-life scores (PQOL and IIQ7) at 1 month from surgery.

Conclusions

R-ALS is feasible, safe, well-tolerated and effective at a short-term follow-up. R-ALS may represent an effective and simple alternative to abdominal sacral hystero-cervicopexy for the treatment of high-grade apical and anterior POP, avoiding the challenges of sacral mesh fixation. Robotic assistance helps achieving optimally tailored anatomic reconstruction, allowing seamless deep pelvic dissection and suturing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Initiative WH (2004) Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 104(3):489–497CrossRefPubMed Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Initiative WH (2004) Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 104(3):489–497CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A (2013) New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27(3):363–379CrossRefPubMed Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A (2013) New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27(3):363–379CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jelovsek JE, Barber MD (2006) Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(5):1455–1461CrossRefPubMed Jelovsek JE, Barber MD (2006) Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(5):1455–1461CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mannella P, Giannini A, Russo E, Naldini G, Simoncini T (2015) Personalizing pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in aging women. Maturitas S0378–5122(15):00736–00737 Mannella P, Giannini A, Russo E, Naldini G, Simoncini T (2015) Personalizing pelvic floor reconstructive surgery in aging women. Maturitas S0378–5122(15):00736–00737
7.
go back to reference Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V, Network PS (2012) Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: “UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse”. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):5–9CrossRefPubMed Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V, Network PS (2012) Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: “UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse”. Int Urogynecol J 23(1):5–9CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O’Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):360e.1–360e.7CrossRef Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O’Rourke P (2011) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):360e.1–360e.7CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H, Network PFD (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):805–823CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H, Network PFD (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):805–823CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C et al (2005) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 47(2):230–236CrossRefPubMed Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C et al (2005) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 47(2):230–236CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R et al (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55(5):1089–1103CrossRefPubMed Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R et al (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55(5):1089–1103CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988CrossRefPubMed Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Dubuisson JB, Yaron M, Wenger JM, Jacob S (2008) Treatment of genital prolapse by laparoscopic lateral suspension using mesh: a series of 73 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(1):49–55CrossRefPubMed Dubuisson JB, Yaron M, Wenger JM, Jacob S (2008) Treatment of genital prolapse by laparoscopic lateral suspension using mesh: a series of 73 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(1):49–55CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dubuisson JB, Eperon I, Jacob S et al (2011) Laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: a continuous series of 218 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39(3):127–131CrossRefPubMed Dubuisson JB, Eperon I, Jacob S et al (2011) Laparoscopic repair of pelvic organ prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh: a continuous series of 218 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39(3):127–131CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3(5):291–306CrossRefPubMed Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA (1994) Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual Life Res 3(5):291–306CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C (2009) Validation of a German version of the P-QOL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(6):641–649CrossRefPubMed Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C (2009) Validation of a German version of the P-QOL Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(6):641–649CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685CrossRefPubMed Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681–685CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118(5):1005–1013CrossRefPubMed Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118(5):1005–1013CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Scott DJ (2011) Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 25(7):2141–2146CrossRefPubMed Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Scott DJ (2011) Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 25(7):2141–2146CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Osmundsen BC, Clark A, Goldsmith C et al (2012) Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):86–88CrossRefPubMed Osmundsen BC, Clark A, Goldsmith C et al (2012) Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18(2):86–88CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Köckerling FA (2006) Lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc 20(3):402–409CrossRefPubMed Schug-Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Köckerling FA (2006) Lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc 20(3):402–409CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Horstmann R, Hellwig M, Classen C, Röttgermann S, Palmes D (2006) Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. World J Surg 30(9):1742–1749CrossRefPubMed Horstmann R, Hellwig M, Classen C, Röttgermann S, Palmes D (2006) Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes. World J Surg 30(9):1742–1749CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD (2013) Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):103–109CrossRefPubMed Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD (2013) Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19(2):103–109CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR (2010) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 117(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR (2010) Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 117(1):62–68CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Leron E, Stanton SL (2001) Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 108(6):629–633PubMed Leron E, Stanton SL (2001) Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG 108(6):629–633PubMed
28.
go back to reference Propst K, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Schimpf MO, Ridgeway B (2014) Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 25(1):21–31CrossRefPubMed Propst K, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Schimpf MO, Ridgeway B (2014) Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 25(1):21–31CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Muffly TM, Diwadkar GB, Paraiso MF (2010) Lumbosacral osteomyelitis after robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 21(12):1569–1571CrossRefPubMed Muffly TM, Diwadkar GB, Paraiso MF (2010) Lumbosacral osteomyelitis after robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 21(12):1569–1571CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes
Authors
Tommaso Simoncini
Eleonora Russo
Paolo Mannella
Andrea Giannini
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4924-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016 Go to the issue