Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016

Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery

Authors: W. A. A. Borstlap, N. Harran, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to report on the feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) as a novel approach to redo colorectal or ileoanal anastomoses.

Methods

From October 2014, a prospective institutional database was created for all consecutive patients who underwent redo surgery by TAMIS for presacral sinus or anastomotic stenosis after low anterior resection or pouch-related problems following restorative proctocolectomy. Intra-operative feasibility, 30-day postoperative outcomes, intestinal continuity and complications after 6-month follow-up were evaluated.

Results

Of 17 included patients, 14 underwent anastomotic reconstruction and three completion proctectomy. The median operation time was 265 min (range 201–413). A successful rendezvous with simultaneous transabdominal access was achieved in 15 patients, and the procedure was completed by TAMIS alone in two. Five patients were readmitted within 30 days (29 %). Two (14 %) patients developed an anastomotic leakage within 30 days and 4 (24 %) developed a pelvic abscess requiring reintervention. One patient developed an urethra stenosis and was managed with a suprapubic catheter. Median follow-up was 9 (6–15) months. Within 6-month follow-up, the redo-TAMIS 1 patient developed a delayed anastomotic leak and 1 patient had a recurrent presacral abscess after stoma closure. Intestinal continuity was reached in 71 % of the patients at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion

TAMIS is a valuable approach in redo pelvic surgery, but is still associated with high complication rates related to the complexity of the underlying problem.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205CrossRefPubMed Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S (2014) A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol 18:775–788CrossRefPubMed Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S (2014) A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol 18:775–788CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C et al (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)–short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27:3165–3172CrossRefPubMed de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C et al (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)–short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27:3165–3172CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Penna M, Knol JJ, Tuynman JB, Tekkis PP, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R (2016) Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol 20:185–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Penna M, Knol JJ, Tuynman JB, Tekkis PP, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R (2016) Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol 20:185–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182CrossRefPubMed Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wexner SD, Berho M (2014) Transanal TAMIS total mesorectal excision (TME)-a work in progress. Tech Coloproctol 18:423–425CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Berho M (2014) Transanal TAMIS total mesorectal excision (TME)-a work in progress. Tech Coloproctol 18:423–425CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Atallah S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:10–16CrossRefPubMed Atallah S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:10–16CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261:228–233CrossRefPubMed Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261:228–233CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Velthuis S, Nieuwenhuis DH, Ruijter TE, Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C (2014) Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 28:3494–3499CrossRefPubMed Velthuis S, Nieuwenhuis DH, Ruijter TE, Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ, Sietses C (2014) Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 28:3494–3499CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18:19–36CrossRefPubMed Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18:19–36CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gill S, Stetler JL, Patel A, et al. (2015) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): standardizing a reproducible procedure. J Gastrointest Surg Gill S, Stetler JL, Patel A, et al. (2015) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): standardizing a reproducible procedure. J Gastrointest Surg
14.
go back to reference Gardenbroek TJ, Musters GD, Buskens CJ et al (2015) Early reconstruction of the leaking ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a novel solution to an old problem. Colorectal Dis 17:426–432CrossRefPubMed Gardenbroek TJ, Musters GD, Buskens CJ et al (2015) Early reconstruction of the leaking ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a novel solution to an old problem. Colorectal Dis 17:426–432CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M et al (2013) Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 56:747–755CrossRefPubMed Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M et al (2013) Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 56:747–755CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery
Authors
W. A. A. Borstlap
N. Harran
P. J. Tanis
W. A. Bemelman
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4889-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2016 Go to the issue