Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

01-11-2016

Vaginal morcellation through the posterior cul-de-sac using an electromechanical morcellator after laparoscopic myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy: a retrospective, case–control study

Authors: Eun-Ju Lee, Dong-Ho Kim

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of vaginal morcellation (VM) through the posterior cul-de-sac (PCDS) using an electromechanical morcellator and to compare the perioperative outcomes of VM with those of abdominal morcellation (AM) to remove a single myoma.

Methods

The characteristics of 245 consecutive patients who had undergone VM after laparoscopic myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy were summarized. A retrospective, matched, case–control study was performed; 64 patients had a myoma weighting 100 g or more. Cases were matched with controls (ratio 1:2), who had undergone AM, by age, body mass index, specimen weight, surgical type, and surgeon. Body image questionnaires were used to assess the cosmetic outcome. Medians were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences between means were assessed using Student’s t test. Dichotomous groupings were analyzed using either the Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Results

All 245 patients underwent VM without complications. The mean weight of the specimens was 197.2 g (range 78.5–1477 g), and the mean duration of morcellation was 13.0 min (range 2.0–45.0 min). Two hours after surgery, the visual analog scale (VAS) score was significantly lower in the VM group than in the AM group (P = 0.03). Moreover, the morcellator used was significantly larger in the VM group (P < 0.001), and morcellation duration was significantly shorter in the VM group (P < 0.001). Finally, cosmetic outcome was significantly better in the VM group (P < 0.02). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of hospitalization duration, surgery duration or VAS score 24 and 47 h postoperatively.

Conclusion

VM through the PCDS using an electromechanical morcellator is a safe and feasible technique for surgical excision. The benefits of the procedure over AM are reduced immediate postoperative pain, shorter morcellation time, and better cosmesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee EJ, Kang H, Kim DH (2011) A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:83–86CrossRefPubMed Lee EJ, Kang H, Kim DH (2011) A comparative study of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with radical abdominal hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:83–86CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Steiner RA, Wight E, Tadir Y, Haller U (1993) Electrical cutting device for laparoscopic removal of tissue from the abdominal cavity. Obstet Gynecol 81:471–474PubMed Steiner RA, Wight E, Tadir Y, Haller U (1993) Electrical cutting device for laparoscopic removal of tissue from the abdominal cavity. Obstet Gynecol 81:471–474PubMed
4.
go back to reference Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG (1994) Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol 84:881–884PubMed Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG (1994) Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol 84:881–884PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 14:490–497CrossRef Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 14:490–497CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Garccau E (1895) Vaginal hysterectomy as done in France. Am J Obstet Gynecol 31:305–316 Garccau E (1895) Vaginal hysterectomy as done in France. Am J Obstet Gynecol 31:305–316
7.
go back to reference Hoffman MS, DeCesare S, Kalter C (1994) Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:309–313 (discussion 313–305) CrossRefPubMed Hoffman MS, DeCesare S, Kalter C (1994) Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:309–313 (discussion 313–305) CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S, Bosuk M, Montz F (1995) Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Obstet Gynecol 86:60–64CrossRefPubMed Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S, Bosuk M, Montz F (1995) Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Obstet Gynecol 86:60–64CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kammerer-Doak D, Mao J (1996) Vaginal hysterectomy with and without morcellation: the University of New Mexico hospital’s experience. Obstet Gynecol 88:560–563CrossRefPubMed Kammerer-Doak D, Mao J (1996) Vaginal hysterectomy with and without morcellation: the University of New Mexico hospital’s experience. Obstet Gynecol 88:560–563CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA (1997) The Pryor technique of uterine morcellation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 58:299–303CrossRefPubMed Pelosi MA 3rd, Pelosi MA (1997) The Pryor technique of uterine morcellation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 58:299–303CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Taylor SM, Romero AA, Kammerer-Doak DN, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2003) Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1579–1582 (discussion 1582–1573) CrossRefPubMed Taylor SM, Romero AA, Kammerer-Doak DN, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2003) Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1579–1582 (discussion 1582–1573) CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gunthert AR, Christmann C, Kostov P, Mueller MD (2015) Safe vaginal uterine morcellation following total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(546):e541–e544 Gunthert AR, Christmann C, Kostov P, Mueller MD (2015) Safe vaginal uterine morcellation following total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(546):e541–e544
13.
go back to reference Kho KA, Shin JH, Nezhat C (2009) Vaginal extraction of large uteri with the Alexis retractor. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:616–617CrossRefPubMed Kho KA, Shin JH, Nezhat C (2009) Vaginal extraction of large uteri with the Alexis retractor. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:616–617CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wong WS, Lee TC, Lim CE (2010) Novel Vaginal “paper roll” uterine morcellation technique for removal of large (>500 g) uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:374–378CrossRefPubMed Wong WS, Lee TC, Lim CE (2010) Novel Vaginal “paper roll” uterine morcellation technique for removal of large (>500 g) uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:374–378CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dubuisson JB, Chapron C (1996) Uterine fibroids: place and modalities of laparoscopic treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 65:91–94CrossRefPubMed Dubuisson JB, Chapron C (1996) Uterine fibroids: place and modalities of laparoscopic treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 65:91–94CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Flint E, Jon LC (1999) Chain removal of myomata by colpotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6:337–338CrossRefPubMed Flint E, Jon LC (1999) Chain removal of myomata by colpotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6:337–338CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Goldfarb HA, Fanarjian NJ (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal myomectomy: a case report and literature review. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 5:81–85 Goldfarb HA, Fanarjian NJ (2001) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal myomectomy: a case report and literature review. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 5:81–85
18.
go back to reference Ou CS, Harper A, Liu YH, Rowbotham R (2002) Laparoscopic myomectomy technique. Use of colpotomy and the harmonic scalpel. J Reprod Med 47:849–853PubMed Ou CS, Harper A, Liu YH, Rowbotham R (2002) Laparoscopic myomectomy technique. Use of colpotomy and the harmonic scalpel. J Reprod Med 47:849–853PubMed
19.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Lee JM, Yu HT, Huang CY, Chin HY, Wang SM (2014) Comparison of morcellator and culdotomy for extraction of uterine fibroids laparoscopically. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 183:183–187CrossRefPubMed Wang CJ, Lee JM, Yu HT, Huang CY, Chin HY, Wang SM (2014) Comparison of morcellator and culdotomy for extraction of uterine fibroids laparoscopically. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 183:183–187CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Steinemann DC, Raptis DA, Lurje G, Oberkofler CE, Wyss R, Zehnder A, Lesurtel M, Vonlanthen R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S (2011) Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). BMC Surg 11:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steinemann DC, Raptis DA, Lurje G, Oberkofler CE, Wyss R, Zehnder A, Lesurtel M, Vonlanthen R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S (2011) Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). BMC Surg 11:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Kim D, Lee J, Bae D (1995) Clinical analysis of pelviscopic classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2:289–297CrossRefPubMed Kim D, Lee J, Bae D (1995) Clinical analysis of pelviscopic classic intrafascial Semm hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2:289–297CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Thele F, Zygmunt M, Glitsch A, Heidecke CD, Schreiber A (2008) How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery? Endoscopy 40:576–580CrossRefPubMed Thele F, Zygmunt M, Glitsch A, Heidecke CD, Schreiber A (2008) How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery? Endoscopy 40:576–580CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P (2012) Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(112):e111–e116 Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P (2012) Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(112):e111–e116
24.
go back to reference Teng FY, Muzsnai D, Perez R, Mazdisnian F, Ross A, Sayre JW (1996) A comparative study of laparoscopy and colpotomy for the removal of ovarian dermoid cysts. Obstet Gynecol 87:1009–1013CrossRefPubMed Teng FY, Muzsnai D, Perez R, Mazdisnian F, Ross A, Sayre JW (1996) A comparative study of laparoscopy and colpotomy for the removal of ovarian dermoid cysts. Obstet Gynecol 87:1009–1013CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Casarin J, Serati M, Ghezzi F (2013) Transvaginal specimen extraction at laparoscopy without concomitant hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:583–590CrossRefPubMed Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Casarin J, Serati M, Ghezzi F (2013) Transvaginal specimen extraction at laparoscopy without concomitant hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20:583–590CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Vaginal morcellation through the posterior cul-de-sac using an electromechanical morcellator after laparoscopic myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy: a retrospective, case–control study
Authors
Eun-Ju Lee
Dong-Ho Kim
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4821-1

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Go to the issue