Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016

Open Access 01-07-2016

Where are my instruments? Hazards in delivery of surgical instruments

Authors: Annetje C. P. Guédon, Linda S. G. L. Wauben, Anne C. van der Eijk, Alex S. N. Vernooij, Frédérique C. Meeuwsen, Maarten van der Elst, Vivian Hoeijmans, Jenny Dankelman, John J. van den Dobbelsteen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Unavailability of instruments is recognised to cause delays and stress in the operating room, which can lead to additional risks for the patients. The aim was to provide an overview of the hazards in the entire delivery process of surgical instruments and to provide insight into how Information Technology (IT) could support this process in terms of information availability and exchange.

Methods

The process of delivery was described according to the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effects Analysis methodology for two hospitals. The different means of information exchange and availability were listed. Then, hazards were identified and further analysed for each step of the process.

Results

For the first hospital, 172 hazards were identified, and 23 of hazards were classified as high risk. Only one hazard was considered as ‘controlled’ (when actions were taken to remove the hazard later in the process). Twenty-two hazards were ‘tolerated’ (when no actions were taken, and it was therefore accepted that adverse events may occur). For the second hospital, 158 hazards were identified, and 49 of hazards were classified as high risk. Eight hazards were ‘controlled’ and 41 were ‘tolerated’. The means for information exchange and information systems were numerous for both cases, while there was not one system that provided an overview of all relevant information.

Conclusions

The majority of the high-risk hazards are expected to be controlled by the use of IT support. Centralised information and information availability for different parties reduce risks related to unavailability of instruments in the operating room.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Archer T, Macario A (2006) The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:171–176CrossRefPubMed Archer T, Macario A (2006) The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:171–176CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sieber TJ, Leibundgut DL (2002) Operating room management and strategies in Switzerland: results of a survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:415–423CrossRefPubMed Sieber TJ, Leibundgut DL (2002) Operating room management and strategies in Switzerland: results of a survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol 19:415–423CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Denton BT, Miller AJ, Balasubramanian HJ, Huschka TR (2010) Optimal allocation of surgery blocks to operating rooms under uncertainty. Oper Res 58:802–816CrossRef Denton BT, Miller AJ, Balasubramanian HJ, Huschka TR (2010) Optimal allocation of surgery blocks to operating rooms under uncertainty. Oper Res 58:802–816CrossRef
4.
6.
go back to reference Wubben I, van Manen JG, van den Akker BJ, Vaartjes SR, van Harten WH (2010) Equipment-related incidents in the operating room: an analysis of occurrence, underlying causes and consequences for the clinical process. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e64. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.037515 PubMed Wubben I, van Manen JG, van den Akker BJ, Vaartjes SR, van Harten WH (2010) Equipment-related incidents in the operating room: an analysis of occurrence, underlying causes and consequences for the clinical process. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e64. doi:10.​1136/​qshc.​2009.​037515 PubMed
7.
go back to reference Baines RJ, Langelaan M, de Bruijne MC, Asscheman H, Spreeuwenberg P, van de Steeg L, Siemerink KM, van Rosse F, Broekens M, Wagner C (2013) Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study. BMJ Qual Saf 22(4):290–298. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126 CrossRefPubMed Baines RJ, Langelaan M, de Bruijne MC, Asscheman H, Spreeuwenberg P, van de Steeg L, Siemerink KM, van Rosse F, Broekens M, Wagner C (2013) Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study. BMJ Qual Saf 22(4):290–298. doi:10.​1136/​bmjqs-2012-001126 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Greenberg CC (2009) Learning from adverse events and near misses. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 13:3–5CrossRef Greenberg CC (2009) Learning from adverse events and near misses. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 13:3–5CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K, Zinner MJ, Dierks MM (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139:159–173CrossRefPubMed Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Roth EM, Sheridan TB, Gandhi TK, Dwyer K, Zinner MJ, Dierks MM (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139:159–173CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. Bmj 320:768–770PubMed Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. Bmj 320:768–770PubMed
11.
go back to reference Weerakkody RA, Cheshire NJ, Riga C, Lear R, Hamady MS, Moorthy K, Darzi AW, Vincent C, Bicknell CD (2013) Surgical technology and operating-room safety failures: a systematic review of quantitative studies. BMJ Qual Saf 22:710–718CrossRefPubMed Weerakkody RA, Cheshire NJ, Riga C, Lear R, Hamady MS, Moorthy K, Darzi AW, Vincent C, Bicknell CD (2013) Surgical technology and operating-room safety failures: a systematic review of quantitative studies. BMJ Qual Saf 22:710–718CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, van der Elst M, Karsten TM, Dankelman J (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery—an observational study. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 21:275–279CrossRef Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, van der Elst M, Karsten TM, Dankelman J (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery—an observational study. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 21:275–279CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, Wilkinson M, Hirst G, Dale T, de Leval MR (2007) Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery 142:102–110CrossRefPubMed Catchpole KR, Giddings AE, Wilkinson M, Hirst G, Dale T, de Leval MR (2007) Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations. Surgery 142:102–110CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N, Tierney T, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am J Surg 199:60–65CrossRefPubMed Arora S, Hull L, Sevdalis N, Tierney T, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room. Am J Surg 199:60–65CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tucker AL (2004) The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J Oper Manag 22:151–169CrossRef Tucker AL (2004) The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J Oper Manag 22:151–169CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van de Klundert J, Muls P, Schadd M (2008) Optimizing sterilization logistics in hospitals. Health Care Manag Sci 11(1):23–33CrossRefPubMed van de Klundert J, Muls P, Schadd M (2008) Optimizing sterilization logistics in hospitals. Health Care Manag Sci 11(1):23–33CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Claassen MJT, van Weele AF, van Raaij EM (2008) Performance outcomes and success factors of vendor managed inventory (VMI). Supply Chain Manag 13:406–414CrossRef Claassen MJT, van Weele AF, van Raaij EM (2008) Performance outcomes and success factors of vendor managed inventory (VMI). Supply Chain Manag 13:406–414CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2003) Designing and managing the supply chain. McGraw-Hill, New York Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2003) Designing and managing the supply chain. McGraw-Hill, New York
19.
go back to reference Fisher JA, Monahan T (2012) Evaluation of real-time location systems in their hospital contexts. Int J Med Inform 81:705–712CrossRefPubMed Fisher JA, Monahan T (2012) Evaluation of real-time location systems in their hospital contexts. Int J Med Inform 81:705–712CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference FDA (2014) Medical device tracking. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Document issued on March 27, 2014 FDA (2014) Medical device tracking. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff Document issued on March 27, 2014
21.
go back to reference Esmail R, Cummings C, Dersch D, Duchscherer G, Glowa J, Liggett G, Hulme T, Patient S, Adverse Events T (2005) Using healthcare failure mode and effect analysis tool to review the process of ordering and administrating potassium chloride and potassium phosphate. Healthc Q 8(Spec):73–80CrossRefPubMed Esmail R, Cummings C, Dersch D, Duchscherer G, Glowa J, Liggett G, Hulme T, Patient S, Adverse Events T (2005) Using healthcare failure mode and effect analysis tool to review the process of ordering and administrating potassium chloride and potassium phosphate. Healthc Q 8(Spec):73–80CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, Nudell T (2002) Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the VA National Center for patient safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 28(248–267):209 DeRosier J, Stalhandske E, Bagian JP, Nudell T (2002) Using health care failure mode and effect analysis: the VA National Center for patient safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 28(248–267):209
23.
go back to reference Habraken MM, Van der Schaaf TW, Leistikow IP, Reijnders-Thijssen PM (2009) Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: a systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA in Dutch health care. Ergonomics 52:809–819CrossRefPubMed Habraken MM, Van der Schaaf TW, Leistikow IP, Reijnders-Thijssen PM (2009) Prospective risk analysis of health care processes: a systematic evaluation of the use of HFMEA in Dutch health care. Ergonomics 52:809–819CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (2012) Guide for risk analysis (Praktijkgids Prospectieve Risico Inventarisatie) Veiligheidsmanagementsysteem (2012) Guide for risk analysis (Praktijkgids Prospectieve Risico Inventarisatie)
25.
go back to reference Linkin DR, Sausman C, Santos L, Lyons C, Fox C, Aumiller L, Esterhai J, Pittman B, Lautenbach E (2005) Applicability of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 41:1014–1019CrossRef Linkin DR, Sausman C, Santos L, Lyons C, Fox C, Aumiller L, Esterhai J, Pittman B, Lautenbach E (2005) Applicability of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to healthcare epidemiology: evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 41:1014–1019CrossRef
26.
go back to reference van der Eijk AC, Rook D, Dankelman J, Smit BJ (2013) Defining hazards of supplemental oxygen therapy in neonatology using the FMEA tool. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 38:221–228CrossRefPubMed van der Eijk AC, Rook D, Dankelman J, Smit BJ (2013) Defining hazards of supplemental oxygen therapy in neonatology using the FMEA tool. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 38:221–228CrossRefPubMed
27.
Metadata
Title
Where are my instruments? Hazards in delivery of surgical instruments
Authors
Annetje C. P. Guédon
Linda S. G. L. Wauben
Anne C. van der Eijk
Alex S. N. Vernooij
Frédérique C. Meeuwsen
Maarten van der Elst
Vivian Hoeijmans
Jenny Dankelman
John J. van den Dobbelsteen
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4537-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue