Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016

01-05-2016

Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?

Author: S. D. Schwaitzberg

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

More than 500,000 robotically assisted procedures were performed worldwide in 2013. Despite broad adoption, there remains a lack of clarity concerning the added cost of the robotic system to the procedure especially in light of an increasing number of ambulatory procedures which are now marketed by hospitals, surgeons and the manufacturer. These procedures are associated with much less reimbursement than inpatient procedures. It is unclear whether these added expenses can be absorbed in these scenarios. Reports vary in opinion concerning the added net costs during robotically assisted laparoscopic hernia or cholecystectomy.

Methods

The worldwide revenues, procedures, and the installed base of robotic system data were reviewed and reanalyzed from the 2013 Intuitive Surgical Investors report. This provided an opportunity to look cost per case projections from the vantage point of actual revenue.

Results

This analysis was based on revenue of 2.27 billion US dollars in the three categories of capital acquisition, instrumentation and accessories, and service revenue. These revenues were then spread across 523,000 cases with varying assumptions. Without regard to expense offsets, the additional cost ranges from $2908 to $8675 depending on what system was purchased and the ability to distribute costs against case volume. Estimates of commercial and government revenue were then compared against these expenses.

Conclusion

The use of the extraordinary technology in the face of low-morbidity low-cost established minimally invasive procedures needs to withstand scrutiny of outcome assessment, revenue and expense considerations and appropriateness review in order to create financially viable approaches to high-volume minimally invasive procedures. Revenue estimates associated with outpatient reimbursement make it difficult to support these expenses, recognizing inpatient procedures represent a different net financial picture.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Huilin L, Gail MH, Braithwaite RS, Gold HT, Walter D, Liu M, Gross CP, Makarov DV (2014) Are hospitals “keeping up with the Joneses”? Assessing the spatial and temporal diffusion of the surgical robot. Healthcare 2(2):152–157CrossRef Huilin L, Gail MH, Braithwaite RS, Gold HT, Walter D, Liu M, Gross CP, Makarov DV (2014) Are hospitals “keeping up with the Joneses”? Assessing the spatial and temporal diffusion of the surgical robot. Healthcare 2(2):152–157CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Elliott VG, Larsen W, Lerner S, Minnis KW, Huber C, Nolan J, Papaconstantinou H, Smythe WR (2014) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at Medicaid reimbursement rates? J Am Coll Surg 218(4):546–551CrossRefPubMed Frazee RC, Elliott VG, Larsen W, Lerner S, Minnis KW, Huber C, Nolan J, Papaconstantinou H, Smythe WR (2014) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at Medicaid reimbursement rates? J Am Coll Surg 218(4):546–551CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rosemurgy A, Ryan C, Klein R, Sukharamwala P, Wood T, Ross S (2015) Does the cost of robotic cholecystectomy translate to a financial burden? Surg Endosc 29(8):2115–2120 Rosemurgy A, Ryan C, Klein R, Sukharamwala P, Wood T, Ross S (2015) Does the cost of robotic cholecystectomy translate to a financial burden? Surg Endosc 29(8):2115–2120
12.
go back to reference Delto JC, Wayne G, Yanes R, Nieder AM, Bhandari A (2015) Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation. J Endourol 29(5):556–560 Delto JC, Wayne G, Yanes R, Nieder AM, Bhandari A (2015) Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation. J Endourol 29(5):556–560
13.
go back to reference Misra M, Schiff J, Rendon G, Rothschild J, Schwaitzberg S (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc 19(9):1266–1271CrossRefPubMed Misra M, Schiff J, Rendon G, Rothschild J, Schwaitzberg S (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc 19(9):1266–1271CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ismail I, Wolff S, Gronfier A, Mutter D, Swantröm LL (2014) A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies. Surg Endosc 29(8):2423–2432CrossRefPubMed Ismail I, Wolff S, Gronfier A, Mutter D, Swantröm LL (2014) A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies. Surg Endosc 29(8):2423–2432CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Financial modeling of current surgical robotic system in outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how should we think about the expense?
Author
S. D. Schwaitzberg
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4457-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016 Go to the issue