Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016

01-05-2016

Importance of pouch size in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study of 14,168 patients

Authors: David Edholm, Johan Ottosson, Magnus Sundbom

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the most common bariatric procedures worldwide, but the importance of gastric pouch size is still under debate. We have studied how pouch size affects risk of marginal ulcer and excess body mass index loss (EBMIL%) at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively.

Methods

Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry included 14,168 LRYGB patients with linear stapled gastrojejunostomies, having complete pre- and postoperative data concerning length of stapler needed to complete the gastric pouch, incidence of marginal ulcers and weight loss. LRYGB technique in Sweden is highly standardized, and total length of stapler was used as a proxy for pouch size.

Results

Mean length of stapler used for the pouch was 145 mm. At 1 year, symptomatic marginal ulcers were noted in 0.9 % of the patients. The relative risk of marginal ulcer increased by 14 % (95 % confidence interval 9–20 %), for each centimeter of stapler used for the pouch. Body mass index (BMI) was reduced from 42.4 ± 5.1 to 36.1 kg/m2 at 6 weeks and 28.9 kg/m2 at 1 year. The total length of stapler predicted EBMIL% at 6 weeks but not at 1 year. Female gender, low preoperative BMI, young age and absence of diabetes predicted better EBMIL% at 1 year.

Conclusion

A smaller pouch reduces the risk of marginal ulcers, but does not predict better weight loss at 1 year. Additional stapling should be avoided as each extra centimeter increases the relative risk of marginal ulcers by 14 %.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Oien DM (2013) Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg 23:1–10CrossRef Buchwald H, Oien DM (2013) Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg 23:1–10CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Csendes A, Burgos AM, Altuve J, Bonacic S (2009) Incidence of marginal ulcer 1 month and 1 to 2 years after gastric bypass: a prospective consecutive endoscopic evaluation of 442 patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19:135–138CrossRefPubMed Csendes A, Burgos AM, Altuve J, Bonacic S (2009) Incidence of marginal ulcer 1 month and 1 to 2 years after gastric bypass: a prospective consecutive endoscopic evaluation of 442 patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19:135–138CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Azagury D, Dayyeh BA, Greenwalt I, Thompson C (2011) Marginal ulceration after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes. Endoscopy 43:950–954CrossRefPubMed Azagury D, Dayyeh BA, Greenwalt I, Thompson C (2011) Marginal ulceration after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes. Endoscopy 43:950–954CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Siilin H, Wanders A, Gustavsson S, Sundbom M (2005) The proximal gastric pouch invariably contains acid-producing parietal cells in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:771–777CrossRefPubMed Siilin H, Wanders A, Gustavsson S, Sundbom M (2005) The proximal gastric pouch invariably contains acid-producing parietal cells in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 15:771–777CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, Burrell M, Dziura J, Bell R (2007) Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1397–1402CrossRefPubMed Roberts K, Duffy A, Kaufman J, Burrell M, Dziura J, Bell R (2007) Size matters: gastric pouch size correlates with weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1397–1402CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P (2011) Pouch size after gastric bypass does not correlate with weight loss outcome. Obes Surg 21:1350–1354CrossRefPubMed Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P (2011) Pouch size after gastric bypass does not correlate with weight loss outcome. Obes Surg 21:1350–1354CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Flanagan L Jr (1996) Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg 6:38–43CrossRefPubMed Flanagan L Jr (1996) Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg 6:38–43CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fobi MA, Lee H, Holness R, Cabinda D (1998) Gastric bypass operation for obesity. World J Surg 22:925–935CrossRefPubMed Fobi MA, Lee H, Holness R, Cabinda D (1998) Gastric bypass operation for obesity. World J Surg 22:925–935CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Olbers T, Lönroth H, Fagevik-Olsén M, Lundell L (2003) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg 13:364–370CrossRefPubMed Olbers T, Lönroth H, Fagevik-Olsén M, Lundell L (2003) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg 13:364–370CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hedenbro J, Näslund E, Boman L, Lundegårdh G, Bylund A, Ekelund M, Laurenius A, Möller P, Olbers T, Sundbom M (2015) Formation of the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SOReg. Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1619-5 Hedenbro J, Näslund E, Boman L, Lundegårdh G, Bylund A, Ekelund M, Laurenius A, Möller P, Olbers T, Sundbom M (2015) Formation of the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, SOReg. Obes Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-015-1619-5
13.
go back to reference Ying VWC, Kim SHH, Khan KJ, Farrokhyar F, D’Souza J, Gmora S, Anvari M, Hong D (2015) Prophylactic PPI help reduce marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Surg Endosc 29:1018–1023 Ying VWC, Kim SHH, Khan KJ, Farrokhyar F, D’Souza J, Gmora S, Anvari M, Hong D (2015) Prophylactic PPI help reduce marginal ulcers after gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Surg Endosc 29:1018–1023
14.
go back to reference Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, Näslund E, Boman L, Bylund A, Hedenbro J, Laurenius A, Lundegårdh G, Lönroth H (2013) Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg 260:1040–1047CrossRef Stenberg E, Szabo E, Agren G, Näslund E, Boman L, Bylund A, Hedenbro J, Laurenius A, Lundegårdh G, Lönroth H (2013) Early complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg 260:1040–1047CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lundell L, Forssell H, Jensen J, Leth R, Lind T, Lycke G, Olbe L (1986) Measurement of pouch volume and stoma diameter after gastroplasty. Int J Obes 11:169–174 Lundell L, Forssell H, Jensen J, Leth R, Lind T, Lycke G, Olbe L (1986) Measurement of pouch volume and stoma diameter after gastroplasty. Int J Obes 11:169–174
16.
go back to reference Näslund I (1986) The size of the gastric outlet and the outcome of surgery for obesity. Acta Chir Scand 152:205–210PubMed Näslund I (1986) The size of the gastric outlet and the outcome of surgery for obesity. Acta Chir Scand 152:205–210PubMed
17.
go back to reference Näslund I (1986) Gastric bypass versus gastroplasty. A prospective study of differences in two surgical procedures for morbid obesity. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 536:1–60 Näslund I (1986) Gastric bypass versus gastroplasty. A prospective study of differences in two surgical procedures for morbid obesity. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 536:1–60
18.
go back to reference Cottam DR, Fisher B, Sridhar V, Atkinson J, Dallal R (2009) The effect of stoma size on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results of a blinded randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg 19:13–17CrossRefPubMed Cottam DR, Fisher B, Sridhar V, Atkinson J, Dallal R (2009) The effect of stoma size on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: results of a blinded randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg 19:13–17CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mason EE, Ito C (1967) Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin N Am 47:1345–1351PubMed Mason EE, Ito C (1967) Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin N Am 47:1345–1351PubMed
20.
go back to reference Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, Kroh M, Chand B (2012) Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8:408–415CrossRefPubMed Heneghan HM, Yimcharoen P, Brethauer SA, Kroh M, Chand B (2012) Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8:408–415CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Edholm D, Svensson F, Näslund I, Karlsson FA, Rask E, Sundbom M (2013) Long-term results 11 years after primary gastric bypass in 384 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:708–713CrossRefPubMed Edholm D, Svensson F, Näslund I, Karlsson FA, Rask E, Sundbom M (2013) Long-term results 11 years after primary gastric bypass in 384 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:708–713CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ma Y, Pagoto SL, Olendzki BC, Hafner AR, Perugini RA, Mason R, Kelly JJ (2006) Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 16:1227–1231CrossRefPubMed Ma Y, Pagoto SL, Olendzki BC, Hafner AR, Perugini RA, Mason R, Kelly JJ (2006) Predictors of weight status following laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 16:1227–1231CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sima E, Hedberg J, Ehrenborg A, Sundbom M (2014) Differences in early complications between circular and linear stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 24:599–603CrossRefPubMed Sima E, Hedberg J, Ehrenborg A, Sundbom M (2014) Differences in early complications between circular and linear stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 24:599–603CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Importance of pouch size in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study of 14,168 patients
Authors
David Edholm
Johan Ottosson
Magnus Sundbom
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4432-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016 Go to the issue