Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2015

01-11-2015

Follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, can it be done by phone? A prospective study in 300 patients, the PINQ-PHONE

Authors: Baukje van den Heuvel, J. A. van Jarwaarde, P. Wichers, E. S. M. de Lange de Klerk, H. J. Bonjer, B. J. Dwars

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The most important long-term complications after inguinal hernia repair are chronic pain and recurrence. Previous follow-up studies showed that physical examination is the only reliable method of follow-up to detect recurrences. However, physical examination is laborious and time consuming. We designed a telephone questionnaire as a method of follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery; the PINQ-PHONE (Post-INguinal-repair-Questionnaire by telePHONE). The aim of this study is to validate the PINQ-PHONE for detecting both asymptomatic and symptomatic recurrences.

Methods

This prospective study contained 300 randomly selected patients after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. All patients were contacted by telephone and the PINQ-PHONE was carried out. The PINQ-PHONE contains four elements; three questions and a do-it-yourself Valsalva maneuvre. Subsequently, all patients were seen in clinic and physical examination (gold standard) was done.

Results

The majority (96 %) was male and the mean age was 66 (range 26–93) years old. The mean interval between surgery and study inclusion was 58 (range 6–141) months. In five (1.7 %) patients, a recurrence was found. All of them replied positively to one or more elements of the PINQ-PHONE. Two-hundred-fifty-two (84 %) patients replied negatively to all elements and none of them had a recurrence. The overall sensitivity was 1.00 and the overall specificity was 0.86.

Conclusion

This study validated the PINQ-PHONE. It is a reliable, practical, and simple method of follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrences.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051CrossRefPubMed Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy. A personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559CrossRefPubMed Lichtenstein IL (1987) Herniorrhaphy. A personal experience with 6,321 cases. Am J Surg 153:553–559CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Leibl BJ, Jäger C, Kraft B et al (2005) Laparoscopic hernia repair–TAPP or/and TEP? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:77–82CrossRefPubMed Leibl BJ, Jäger C, Kraft B et al (2005) Laparoscopic hernia repair–TAPP or/and TEP? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:77–82CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRefPubMed Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF et al (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C et al (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17:190–195CrossRefPubMed Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C et al (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17:190–195CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B et al (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc 12:226–231CrossRefPubMed Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B et al (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty. A multicenter study. Surg Endosc 12:226–231CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L et al (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400CrossRefPubMed Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L et al (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194:394–400CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference López-Cano M, Vilallonga R, Sánchez JL et al (2007) Short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders as a method of follow-up in hernia surgery. Hernia 11:397–402CrossRefPubMed López-Cano M, Vilallonga R, Sánchez JL et al (2007) Short postal questionnaire and selective clinical examination combined with repeat mailing and telephone reminders as a method of follow-up in hernia surgery. Hernia 11:397–402CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JS et al (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 164:533–536CrossRefPubMed Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JS et al (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 164:533–536CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28CrossRefPubMed Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Follow-up after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, can it be done by phone? A prospective study in 300 patients, the PINQ-PHONE
Authors
Baukje van den Heuvel
J. A. van Jarwaarde
P. Wichers
E. S. M. de Lange de Klerk
H. J. Bonjer
B. J. Dwars
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4080-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2015 Go to the issue