Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2015

01-09-2015

Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer

Authors: Ramzi Amri, Liliana G. Bordeianou, Patricia Sylla, David L. Berger

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Stapled gastrointestinal anastomosis has gained wide adoption among the surgical community for its ease, speed, and its applicability in laparoscopic surgery. Over the last decade, with the increase in laparoscopic techniques in colon surgery, anastomotic stapling has become the technique of choice for colon cancer surgery at our center. This abstract assesses whether the increasing adoption of anastomotic stapling affected the rate of anastomotic leaks and duration of surgery.

Methods

All patients surgically treated for colon cancer with a primary bowel anastomosis from 2004 through 2011 were included (n = 998). Duration of stay, surgery, and postoperative complication rates was compared between hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis.

Results

The number of stapled anastomoses grew significantly from 45.8 % in 2004–2007 to 80.3 % in 2008–2011 (p < 0.001), and an increasing portion of those is performed in laparoscopic procedures (29.8 to 43.3 %; p = 0.01). Surgeries using stapled anastomosis initially took longer, but a decreasing trend (2004–2007: 147.5 min to 2007–2011: 124 min; p < 0.001) along with an increasing duration in hand-sewn surgeries (94–118.5 min; p < 0.01) meant stapled procedures became shorter than hand-sewn procedures by 2009. Complication rates did not differ significantly between groups, with stapled anastomoses having lower percentages of anastomotic leaks (1.6 vs. 2.4 %; p = 0.38). By the second half of our research period, the median admission for patients with stapled anastomoses was two days shorter (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), independently of the chosen approach.

Conclusion

Stapled anastomoses did not increase anastomotic leak rates. If anything, leak rates appeared slightly lower. In addition, stapled anastomoses significantly shortened operation duration. With the benefit of being a tool that facilitates minimally invasive surgery, it is a safe way to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and promote faster and better recovery.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 148(2):190–201CrossRefPubMed Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2013) Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 148(2):190–201CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fingerhut A, Elhadad A, Hay JM, Lacaine F, Flamant Y (1994) Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 116(3):484–490PubMed Fingerhut A, Elhadad A, Hay JM, Lacaine F, Flamant Y (1994) Infraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples. A controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 116(3):484–490PubMed
4.
go back to reference MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189CrossRefPubMed MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ (1985) Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 72(8):603–605CrossRefPubMed McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ (1985) Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 72(8):603–605CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Neutzling CB, Lustosa SAS, Proenca IM, da Silva EMK, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:003144 Neutzling CB, Lustosa SAS, Proenca IM, da Silva EMK, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:003144
7.
go back to reference Reid JD, Robins RE, Atkinson KG (1984) Pelvic recurrence after anterior resection and EEA stapling anastomosis for potentially curable carcinoma of the rectum. Am J Surg 147(5):629–632CrossRefPubMed Reid JD, Robins RE, Atkinson KG (1984) Pelvic recurrence after anterior resection and EEA stapling anastomosis for potentially curable carcinoma of the rectum. Am J Surg 147(5):629–632CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bisgaard C, Svanholm H, Jensen AS (1986) Recurrent carcinoma after low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA staple gun. Acta Chir Scand. 152:157–160PubMed Bisgaard C, Svanholm H, Jensen AS (1986) Recurrent carcinoma after low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA staple gun. Acta Chir Scand. 152:157–160PubMed
9.
go back to reference Akyol AM, McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, Murray G, George WD (1991) Recurrence of colorectal cancer after sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses. Br J Surg 78(11):1297–1300CrossRefPubMed Akyol AM, McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, Murray G, George WD (1991) Recurrence of colorectal cancer after sutured and stapled large bowel anastomoses. Br J Surg 78(11):1297–1300CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 221(2):176–184PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 221(2):176–184PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Renewed assessment of the stapled anastomosis with the increasing role of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer
Authors
Ramzi Amri
Liliana G. Bordeianou
Patricia Sylla
David L. Berger
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3989-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2015 Go to the issue