Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014

01-03-2014

Design and validation of an assessment tool for open surgical procedures

Authors: Neil Rittenhouse, Bharat Sharma, Ranil Sonnadara, Alex Mihailidis, Teodor Grantcharov

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy is currently the gold standard for cholecystectomy. Recent literature suggests surgical trainees have limited exposure to open cholecystectomy, which may result in suboptimal performance in the event of conversion. Furthermore, most training and assessment models are designed for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with limited opportunities for open simulator training. The present study’s purpose was to design an inexpensive model for open cholecystectomy and to validate a performance assessment tool.

Methods

The simulator comprises a porcine liver and gallbladder in a mock human abdomen with silicon skin. The assessment tool utilizes inexpensive infrared (IR) cameras to provide tracking of participant hand motions. Eleven novice general surgery trainees (<20 cholecystectomies) and five expert surgeons (>100 cholecystectomies) completed an open cholecystectomy using the simulator. Procedures were recorded and assessed by a blinded evaluator using a global rating scale. Tracking data analysis was based on number of movements and total path length.

Results

Novices (t = 36.18 min) completed the procedure significantly slower than did experts (t = 19.53 min) (Mann–Whitney test U = 20, p < 0.05) and had significantly more hand movements (Mann–Whitney test U = 20, p < 0.05). Analysis of the total global rating scale scores showed a significant difference between novice (14/35) and expert (24/35) performance in all categories (Mann–Whitney test U = 58, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The present model presents a realistic, low-cost tool for training and assessment of procedural skills in open cholecystectomy. The study demonstrated the validity of the IR tracking device as an objective assessment tool for open surgical skills training. Future training should incorporate this low-cost, highly effective training device into surgical curricula.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM et al (1991) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the harvard medical practice study I. N Engl J Med 324:370–376PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IAMJ et al (2005) The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course: improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 19(9):1220–1226PubMedCrossRef Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ, Broeders IAMJ et al (2005) The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course: improving operating room performance using virtual reality training: results from the first E.A.E.S. accredited virtual reality trainings curriculum. Surg Endosc 19(9):1220–1226PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240(3):518–525 discussion 525–528PubMedCrossRef Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240(3):518–525 discussion 525–528PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD006231 Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD006231
6.
go back to reference Visser BC, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2008) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoendoscopic era. Am J Surg 195(1):108–114PubMedCrossRef Visser BC, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2008) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoendoscopic era. Am J Surg 195(1):108–114PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H et al (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19(3):401–405PubMedCrossRef Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H et al (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19(3):401–405PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference García Galisteo E, Del Rosal Samaniego JM, Baena González V et al (2006) Laparoscopic surgery training in pelvitrainer and virtual simulators. Actas Urol Esp 30(5):451–456PubMedCrossRef García Galisteo E, Del Rosal Samaniego JM, Baena González V et al (2006) Laparoscopic surgery training in pelvitrainer and virtual simulators. Actas Urol Esp 30(5):451–456PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ et al (1998) Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 50:124–130PubMed Taffinder N, Sutton C, Fishwick RJ et al (1998) Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 50:124–130PubMed
10.
go back to reference Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278PubMedCrossRef Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K et al (2008) Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room. Ann Surg 247(2):372–379PubMedCrossRef Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K et al (2008) Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room. Ann Surg 247(2):372–379PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M et al (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193(5):479–485PubMedCrossRef Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M et al (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193(5):479–485PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sonnadara RR, Rittenhouse N, Khan A et al (2012) A novel multimodal platform for assessing surgical technical skills. Am J Surg 203(1):32–36PubMedCrossRef Sonnadara RR, Rittenhouse N, Khan A et al (2012) A novel multimodal platform for assessing surgical technical skills. Am J Surg 203(1):32–36PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference King RC, Atallah L, Lo BPL, Yang G (2009) Development of a wireless sensor glove for surgical skills assessment. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(5):673–679PubMedCrossRef King RC, Atallah L, Lo BPL, Yang G (2009) Development of a wireless sensor glove for surgical skills assessment. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 13(5):673–679PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dosis A, Aggarwal R, Bello F et al (2005) Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg 140(3):293–299PubMedCrossRef Dosis A, Aggarwal R, Bello F et al (2005) Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg 140(3):293–299PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N et al (2008) Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc 22(4):885–900PubMedCrossRef Powers KA, Rehrig ST, Irias N et al (2008) Simulated laparoscopic operating room crisis: an approach to enhance the surgical team performance. Surg Endosc 22(4):885–900PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Svoboda T, Martinec D, Pajdla T (2005) A convenient multi-camera self-calibration for virtual environments. PRESENCE Teleoper Virtual Environ 14(4):407–422CrossRef Svoboda T, Martinec D, Pajdla T (2005) A convenient multi-camera self-calibration for virtual environments. PRESENCE Teleoper Virtual Environ 14(4):407–422CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Design and validation of an assessment tool for open surgical procedures
Authors
Neil Rittenhouse
Bharat Sharma
Ranil Sonnadara
Alex Mihailidis
Teodor Grantcharov
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3247-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014 Go to the issue