Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014

01-01-2014

Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients

Authors: Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen, Kirstine Moll Harboe, Linda Bardram

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The number of Danish inhabitants older than 65 years is increasing, and cholecystectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed for this age group. This study aimed to analyze the role of age as an independent predictor of outcome for elderly cholecystectomy patients.

Methods

Data from the Danish Cholecystectomy Database (2006–2010) were used. The outcomes of interest were conversion rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, outpatient rate, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rate, and frequency of additional procedures and death within 30 days postoperatively.

Results

In this study, 697 patients 80 years of age or older and 4,915 patients ages 65–70 years were compared with 8,805 patients ages 50–64 years. Significantly more patients age 80 years or older underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis, and the conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was significantly higher in the oldest group. The older patients had longer postoperative hospital stays, but nearly 30 % of the patients age 80 years or older were admitted for only 0–1 day and not readmitted, and nearly half of the patients were admitted for only 0–3 days without readmission. Also, the mortality rate and the number of patients who underwent additional procedures within 30 days were higher in the oldest group (6 vs 0.1 and 28 vs 15 %, respectively). A subanalysis of the patients age 80 years or older classified as American Society of Anesthesiology 1 and 2 without acute cholecystitis showed that 44 % left the hospital within 1 day and 63 % within 3 days without readmission and that the 30-day mortality rate was only 2 %.

Conclusions

Age is an independent predictor for worse outcome after cholecystectomy. However, among otherwise healthy patients age 80 years or older who underwent surgery before acute inflammatory complications occurred, 63 % had a fast and uncomplicated course. Thus, it seems fair to recommend elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy when repeated gallstone symptoms have occurred also for the older patient, particularly before the patient experiences acute cholecystitis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705PubMedCrossRef Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reiss R, Deutsch AA (1985) Emergency abdominal procedures in patients above 70. J Gerontol 40:154–158PubMedCrossRef Reiss R, Deutsch AA (1985) Emergency abdominal procedures in patients above 70. J Gerontol 40:154–158PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kuy S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Desai R, Rosenthal RA (2011) Age matters: a study of clinical and economic outcomes following cholecystectomy in elderly Americans. Am J Surg 201:789–796PubMedCrossRef Kuy S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Desai R, Rosenthal RA (2011) Age matters: a study of clinical and economic outcomes following cholecystectomy in elderly Americans. Am J Surg 201:789–796PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Weber D (2003) Laparoscopic surgery, an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef Weber D (2003) Laparoscopic surgery, an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 138:1083–1088PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG (1998) Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 176:627–631PubMedCrossRef Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Rutledge R, Brinker CC, Maxwell BG (1998) Cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 and older. Am J Surg 176:627–631PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Maxwell BG, Brinker CC, Covington DL (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Am Surg 54:826–831 Maxwell JG, Tyler BA, Maxwell BG, Brinker CC, Covington DL (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians. Am Surg 54:826–831
8.
go back to reference Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E (2001) Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 67:637–640PubMed Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E (2001) Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 67:637–640PubMed
9.
go back to reference Pessaux P, Tuech J-J, Derouet N, Rouge C, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1067–1069PubMed Pessaux P, Tuech J-J, Derouet N, Rouge C, Regenet N, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1067–1069PubMed
10.
go back to reference Huber FD, Martin EW, Cooperman M (1983) Cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Am J Surg 146:719–722PubMedCrossRef Huber FD, Martin EW, Cooperman M (1983) Cholecystectomy in elderly patients. Am J Surg 146:719–722PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database. Int J Qual Health Care 23:565–573PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77:1014–1020PubMed Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77:1014–1020PubMed
16.
go back to reference Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, Bender JS (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: applicability in the geriatric population. Am Surg 63:91–96PubMed Magnuson TH, Ratner LE, Zenilman ME, Bender JS (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: applicability in the geriatric population. Am Surg 63:91–96PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishukawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2011) Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach, and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis. Int J Surg 9:392–399PubMedCrossRef Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishukawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2011) Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach, and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis. Int J Surg 9:392–399PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bergman S, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Fraser SA, Newman D, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Monette J (2011) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61PubMedCrossRef Bergman S, Sourial N, Vedel I, Hanna WC, Fraser SA, Newman D, Bilek AJ, Galatas C, Marek JE, Monette J (2011) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients
Authors
Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen
Kirstine Moll Harboe
Linda Bardram
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3144-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2014 Go to the issue