Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013

01-10-2013

Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy

Authors: Rachel M. Owen, Sebastian D. Perez, Nathan Lytle, Ankit Patel, S. S. Davis, Edward Lin, John F. Sweeney

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prolonged operative duration is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is associated with longer operative duration compared with open colectomy (OC), research shows paradoxically decreased morbidity following LC versus OC. The direct impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) following LC versus OC has not been analyzed.

Methods

We queried the ACS/NSQIP 2009-2010 Public Use File for patients who underwent elective LC and OC. The associations between operative duration and a PPC (pneumonia, intubation >48 h, and unplanned intubation) were evaluated. Multivariable regression models were created to determine the independent effect of operative time on the development of PPC controlling for LC versus OC.

Results

A total of 25,419 colectomies (13,741 laparoscopic and 11,678 open) were reviewed; 765 (3 %) patients experienced at least one PPC. Regression modeling demonstrated that for both LC and OC each 60-min increase in operative time up to 480 min was associated with 13 % increased odds of PPC [odds ratio (OR) 1.13; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.19]. Beyond 480 min, each additional 60-min interval was associated with 33 % increased risk of PPC (OR 1.33; 95 % CI 1.12–1.58). Overall, PPCs occurred half as often following LC [270 (2 %) laparoscopic vs. 497 (4.3 %) open; OR 0.45; 95 % CI 0.39–0.53].

Conclusions

Operative duration is independently associated with increased risk of PPC in patients undergoing LC and OC. However, a laparoscopic approach carries half the absolute risk of PPC and, when safe, should be preferentially utilized despite a potential for prolonged operative duration.
Literature
1.
Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB (2010) General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 210:60–65.e61–62
2.
Jackson TD, Wannares JJ, Lancaster RT, Rattner DW, Hutter MM (2011) Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 25:2288–2295PubMedCrossRef
3.
Johnson RG, Arozullah AM, Neumayer L, Henderson WG, Hosokawa P, Khuri SF (2007) Multivariable predictors of postoperative respiratory failure after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg 204:1188–1198PubMedCrossRef
4.
Mitchell CK, Smoger SH, Pfeifer MP, Vogel RL, Pandit MK, Donnelly PJ, Garrison RN, Rothschild MA (1998) Multivariate analysis of factors associated with postoperative pulmonary complications following general elective surgery. Arch Surg 133:194–198PubMedCrossRef
5.
Qaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, Hornbake ER, Lawrence VA, Smetana GW, Weiss K, Owens DK, Aronson M, Barry P, Casey DE Jr, Cross JT Jr, Sherif KD, Weiss KB (2006) Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 144:575–580PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
Smetana GW (2009) Postoperative pulmonary complications: an update on risk assessment and reduction. Clevel Clin J Med 76(Suppl 4):S60–S65CrossRef
8.
Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell DA Jr (2004) Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 199:531–537PubMedCrossRef
9.
Khuri SF, Henderson WG, DePalma RG, Mosca C, Healey NA, Kumbhani DJ (2005) Determinants of long-term survival after major surgery and the adverse effect of postoperative complications. Ann Surg 242:326–341PubMed
10.
Khan NA, Quan H, Bugar JM, Lemaire JB, Brant R, Ghali WA (2006) Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center. J Gen Intern Med 21:177–180PubMed
11.
Arozullah AM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley JC (2001) Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 135:847–857PubMedCrossRef
12.
Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J (2010) Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 113:1338–1350PubMedCrossRef
13.
Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse RA, Morrow LE (2011) Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest 140:1207–1215PubMedCrossRef
14.
Fry DE, Pine M, Jones BL, Meimban RJ (2010) Patient characteristics and the occurrence of never events. Arch Surg 145:148–151PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hall JC, Tarala RA, Hall JL, Mander J (1991) A multivariate analysis of the risk of pulmonary complications after laparotomy. Chest 99:923–927PubMedCrossRef
16.
Pokala N, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2005) Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:531–535PubMedCrossRef
17.
Webb S, Rubinfeld I, Velanovich V, Horst HM, Reickert C (2012) Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for risk adjustment to compare Clavien 4 and 5 complications in open and laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 26:732–737PubMedCrossRef
18.
Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733PubMedCrossRef
19.
Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, De Sanctis A (2000) Laparoscopic colonic resections versus open surgery: a prospective non-randomized study on 310 unselected cases. Hepatogastroenterology 47:697–708PubMed
20.
Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef
21.
Nelson H, Sargent DJ (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
22.
Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72PubMed
23.
Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1314 discussion 1314–1315PubMedCrossRef
24.
Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52:183–186PubMedCrossRef
25.
Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 196:403–406PubMedCrossRef
26.
Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Nguyen B, Tung V, Stamos MJ, Mills S (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in elective surgery for diverticulitis. World J Surg 35:2143–2148PubMedCrossRef
27.
Jones RS, Brown C, Opelka F (2005) Surgeon compensation: “Pay for performance,” the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, the Surgical Care Improvement Program, and other considerations. Surgery 138:829–836PubMedCrossRef
28.
Khuri SF (2006) Safety, quality, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Am Surg 72:994–998 discussion 1021–1030, 1133-1048PubMed
29.
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Barbour G, Lowry P, Irvin G, Gibbs J, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Stremple JF et al (1995) The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg 180:519–531PubMed
30.
Atherly A, Fink AS, Campbell DC, Mentzer RM Jr, Henderson W, Khuri S, Culler SD (2004) Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery. Am J Surg 188:566–570PubMedCrossRef
31.
Gordon HS, Johnson ML, Wray NP, Petersen NJ, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Geraci JM (2005) Mortality after noncardiac surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data. Med Care 43:159–167PubMedCrossRef
32.
Hall BL, Hirbe M, Waterman B, Boslaugh S, Dunagan WC (2007) Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution. J Am Coll Surg 205:767–777PubMedCrossRef
33.
Steinberg SM, Popa MR, Michalek JA, Bethel MJ, Ellison EC (2008) Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement. Surgery 144:662–667 discussion 662-667PubMedCrossRef
34.
Brooks-Brunn JA (1997) Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest 111:564–571PubMedCrossRef
35.
da Luz MoreiraA, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Geisler DP, Church JM, Garofalo T, Fazio VW (2010) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 24:1280–1286CrossRef
36.
Bruce CJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Roberts PL, Rusin LC (1996) Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S1–S6PubMedCrossRef
37.
Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mattar SG, Venkatesh KR, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ (2004) Laparoscopic vs open resection for the treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 18:276–280PubMedCrossRef
38.
Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10:15–18PubMedCrossRef
39.
Vaid S, Tucker J, Bell T, Grim R, Ahuja V (2012) Cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population database. Am Surg 78:635–641PubMed
40.
Kassin MT, Owen RM, Perez S, Leeds I, Cox JC, Schnier K, Sadiraj V, Sweeney JF (2012) Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 215(3):322–330PubMedCrossRef
41.
Lengyel BI, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkoli A (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: What is the price of conversion? Surgery 152:173–178PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy
Authors
Rachel M. Owen
Sebastian D. Perez
Nathan Lytle
Ankit Patel
S. S. Davis
Edward Lin
John F. Sweeney
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2949-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Single-port thoracoscopic surgery using the SILS port

OriginalPaper

Impact of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) on subjective and objective GERD indices: a systematic review of the published literature

OriginalPaper

Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up

OriginalPaper

Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery

OriginalPaper

Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients

OriginalPaper

A prospective assessment of renal oxygenation in children undergoing laparoscopy using near-infrared spectroscopy