Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013

01-07-2013

Survival following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery

Authors: Andrew R. Day, Ralph V. P. Smith, Iain C. Jourdan, Tim A. Rockall

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is known to provide increased benefits to patients during the postoperative recovery period. Initial scepticism over the oncological adequacy of resection has been dismissed by a number of major randomized trials. Emerging evidence indicates that laparoscopic surgery may provide a potential survival benefit in colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or open resection for colorectal cancer between October 2003 and December 2010 were analyzed. Data were collated and a database compiled. Survival analysis was calculated by using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 665 resections were performed with 457 laparoscopically and 208 open. The median length of stay was 4 days following laparoscopic resection and 7 days following open (p < 0.0005). There was no significant difference between the two groups apart from gender (p = 0.03), ASA (p = 0.03), and the number of patients with extranodal metastatic disease (p = 0.01). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the completed laparoscopic group was 75.8 versus 72.5 % in the open group (p = 0.12). The 5-year OS in patients who were converted was 52 %. The 5-year OS for nonmetastatic disease in the completed laparoscopic group was significantly greater at 79.4 versus 74 % in the open group (p = 0.03). There was no difference between the groups in OS for rectal cancer (p = 0.66), but there was an OS advantage for laparoscopically resected colon cancer (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic resection for nonmetastatic colon cancer may provide an overall survival advantage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aly EH (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(7):541–544PubMedCrossRef Aly EH (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(7):541–544PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R, Carus T, Stroux A, Schwenk W, Trialists LAPKONII (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1458–1467PubMedCrossRef Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R, Carus T, Stroux A, Schwenk W, Trialists LAPKONII (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96(12):1458–1467PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) (3):CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) (3):CD003145
5.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91(9):1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(8):921–928PubMedCrossRef Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(8):921–928PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8(5):375–388PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8(5):375–388PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND (2004) Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc 18(7):1022–1028PubMedCrossRef Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND (2004) Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review. Surg Endosc 18(7):1022–1028PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Evans C, Galustian C, Kumar D et al (2009) Impact of surgery on immunologic function: comparison between minimally invasive techniques and conventional laparotomy for surgical resection of colorectal tumors. Am J Surg 197(2):238–245PubMedCrossRef Evans C, Galustian C, Kumar D et al (2009) Impact of surgery on immunologic function: comparison between minimally invasive techniques and conventional laparotomy for surgical resection of colorectal tumors. Am J Surg 197(2):238–245PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(1):53–59PubMedCrossRef Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(1):53–59PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17(6):972–978PubMedCrossRef Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD et al (2003) Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17(6):972–978PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Novitsky YW, Litwin DE, Callery MP (2004) The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18(10):1411–1419PubMedCrossRef Novitsky YW, Litwin DE, Callery MP (2004) The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18(10):1411–1419PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Day W, Lau PY, Li KM, Kwok SY, Yip AW (2011) Clinical outcome of open and laparoscopic surgery in Dukes’ B and C rectal cancer: experience from a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 17(1):26–32PubMed Day W, Lau PY, Li KM, Kwok SY, Yip AW (2011) Clinical outcome of open and laparoscopic surgery in Dukes’ B and C rectal cancer: experience from a regional hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 17(1):26–32PubMed
17.
go back to reference Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo SH (2009) Comparison of outcome of open and laparoscopic resection for stage II and stage III rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1488–1493PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo SH (2009) Comparison of outcome of open and laparoscopic resection for stage II and stage III rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1488–1493PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(11):1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M et al (2004) European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M et al (2004) European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18(8):1163–1185PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wu FP, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Leeuwen PA, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2003) Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46(2):147–155PubMedCrossRef Wu FP, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, van Leeuwen PA, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (2003) Systemic and peritoneal inflammatory response after laparoscopic or conventional colon resection in cancer patients: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46(2):147–155PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Berglund A, Cedermark B, Glimelius B (2008) Is it deleterious to delay the start of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer stage III. Ann Oncol 19(2):400–402PubMedCrossRef Berglund A, Cedermark B, Glimelius B (2008) Is it deleterious to delay the start of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer stage III. Ann Oncol 19(2):400–402PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Survival following laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery
Authors
Andrew R. Day
Ralph V. P. Smith
Iain C. Jourdan
Tim A. Rockall
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2750-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013 Go to the issue