Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012

Open Access 01-05-2012

Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?

Authors: S. A. F. Fransen, L. S. Mertens, S. M. B. I. Botden, L. P. S. Stassen, N. D. Bouvy

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopy is a step forward toward nearly scarless surgery. Concern has been raised that single-incision laparoscopy is technically more challenging than conventional laparoscopy. This study researched the performance curves of novice trainees for single-incision laparoscopy (SILS) versus conventional laparoscopy for performing two basic tasks on a box trainer.

Methods

In this study, 20 novice participants performed two tasks (peg transfer and a dissection task) on a standard box trainer. All the participants practiced each task 11 times and were randomized in two groups. The first group performed the tasks on a box trainer through three incisions. The second group used a single-incision access with the same box trainer. The assessment scores for errors and time were recorded. The 2nd, 8th, and 11th runs of both tasks in both settings were assessed to objectify the gain in basic laparoscopic skills.

Results

The performance curves for both groups improved significantly in terms of both time and errors in performing the two tasks [P < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. For the first task, no significant difference in time between the two groups was observed at the top of the performance curve (mean, 212 ± 64 vs. 182 ± 48 s), but the SILS group performed with fewer errors (1.3 ± 1.5 vs. 2.7 ± 2.11). However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.10). The dissection task was performed faster in the SILS group (mean, 205 ± 78 vs. 243 ± 40 s; P = 0, 18) with fewer errors (0.7 ± 1.05 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1; P = 0. 12), but the difference was not significant.

Conclusion

This study showed a significant improvement in basic skills for both the SILS and conventional laparoscopy settings after 11 repetitions. These data suggest that box training shows no significant difference between conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic settings in terms of error or time in performing basic tasks at a low complexity level for the novice. These data also show significant improvement in basic skills over a relatively short period.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chamberlain RS, Sakpal SV (2009) A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1733–1740PubMedCrossRef Chamberlain RS, Sakpal SV (2009) A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1733–1740PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Mc Clure N, Mc Guigan J et al (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, Mc Clure N, Mc Guigan J et al (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30:617–620PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:483–490PubMedCrossRef Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:483–490PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24:709–714PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24:709–714PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Botden SMBI, de Hingh IHJT, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) Suturing training in augmented reality: gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster. Surg Endosc 23:2131–2137PubMedCrossRef Botden SMBI, de Hingh IHJT, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) Suturing training in augmented reality: gaining proficiency in suturing skills faster. Surg Endosc 23:2131–2137PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Sickle KR (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231PubMedCrossRef Van Sickle KR (2005) Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc 19:1227–1231PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18:121–127PubMedCrossRef Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance. Surg Endosc 18:121–127PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558PubMedCrossRef Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: Is it really more difficult for the novice?
Authors
S. A. F. Fransen
L. S. Mertens
S. M. B. I. Botden
L. P. S. Stassen
N. D. Bouvy
Publication date
01-05-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2041-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2012 Go to the issue