Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Dynamic Manuscript

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments

Authors: Hongyi Cui, John J. Kelly, Demetrius E. M. Litwin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) may increase the risk of bile duct injury due to compromised operative exposure. Dome-down laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides the ability to evaluate the cystic duct circumferentially prior to its division, thus minimizing the risks of bile duct injury. This study assesses the feasibility and safety of SILC using a modified dome-down approach with all conventional laparoscopic instruments.

Methods

Three low-profile 5-mm trocars are placed via a single transumbilical incision. The two working trocars are aimed laterally via the rectus to achieve adequate triangulation. An extralong 5-mm 30º laparoscope with an L-shaped light-cord adaptor is used to yield more external working space. Cephalic liver retraction is achieved with one transabdominal suture through the gallbladder fundus. Leaving the gallbladder fundus attached to the liver bed, a window is first created between the gallbladder body and the liver. The dissection is then carried down retrograde toward the porta hepatis. A 360º view of the gallbladder–cystic duct junction is achieved prior to transecting the cystic duct. The gallbladder is then freed by separation of the fundal attachments. The specimen is retrieved by enlarging the fascial incision. All fascial defects are then primarily closed.

Results

Sixteen patients (mean age 31 years, mean BMI 26.3 kg/m2) were enrolled in this study. Thirteen had elective surgery for symptomatic cholelithiasis, and three had emergency surgery for acute cholecystitis. Mean operating time was 80.3 min, and blood loss was minimal. All patients were discharged within 24 h without complications. Follow-up at 1 month revealed a barely visible scar within the umbilicus.

Conclusions

SILC using a modified dome-down approach is technically feasible with all straight instruments, and it is safe because of good delineation of ductal anatomy. Adoption of this approach may minimize the risk of bile duct injury during early experience of SILC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23:1419–1427PubMedCrossRef Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23:1419–1427PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–686PubMed Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–686PubMed
3.
go back to reference Mahmud S, Masaud M, Canna K, Nassar AHM (2002) Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a safe means of reducing the conversion rate. Surg Endosc 16:581–584PubMedCrossRef Mahmud S, Masaud M, Canna K, Nassar AHM (2002) Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a safe means of reducing the conversion rate. Surg Endosc 16:581–584PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tuveri M, Calo PG, Medas F, Tuveri A, Nicolosi A (2008) Limits and advantages of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol 18(1):69–75CrossRef Tuveri M, Calo PG, Medas F, Tuveri A, Nicolosi A (2008) Limits and advantages of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol 18(1):69–75CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Choi J, Milone L, Bessler M (2009) Emerging technologies—single-incision laparoscopic surgery: how and why? Bariatric Times 5(4):469–475 Choi J, Milone L, Bessler M (2009) Emerging technologies—single-incision laparoscopic surgery: how and why? Bariatric Times 5(4):469–475
6.
go back to reference Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 209(5):632–637PubMedCrossRef Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 209(5):632–637PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single port access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol 19(2):219–222CrossRef Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single port access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol 19(2):219–222CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Solomon D, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc 24(12):2954–2957PubMedCrossRef Solomon D, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc 24(12):2954–2957PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a modified dome-down approach with conventional laparoscopic instruments
Authors
Hongyi Cui
John J. Kelly
Demetrius E. M. Litwin
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1985-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2012 Go to the issue