Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012

01-03-2012

Plasma from the second and third weeks after open colorectal resection for cancer stimulates in vitro endothelial cell growth, migration, and invasion

Authors: H. M. C. Shantha Kumara, Daniel Kirchoff, Samer Naffouje, Michael Grieco, Sonali A. C. Herath, Nadav Dujovny, Matthew F. Kalady, Neil Hyman, Linda Njoh, Richard L. Whelan

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Angiogenesis is central to wound healing and tumor growth. Postoperative (postop) plasma from weeks 2 and 3 after minimally invasive colorectal resection (MICR) stimulates endothelial cell (EC) migration (MIG), invasion (INV), and proliferation (all vital to angiogenesis) compared with preoperative (preop) plasma results and may promote postop tumor growth. The purpose of this study was to determine whether plasma from open colorectal resection (OCR) patients has similar proangiogenic EC effects in vitro.

Methods

OCR cancer patient plasma from institutional review board-approved banks was used; patients with preop and one postop sample from postoperative days (POD) 7–33 were eligible. Samples were bundled into 7- to 13-day periods and considered as single time points. In vitro cultures of human umbilical venous ECs were used for the EC proliferation (BPF, Branch Point Formation), INV, and MIG assays performed with preop, POD 7–13, POD 14–20, and POD 21–33 plasma. Data were analyzed by paired t test and were reported as mean ± standard deviation (significance, P < 0.05).

Results

Plasma from 53 cancer patients (25 rectal and 28 colon) was used. Because of limited postop samples, the number for each time point varies: POD 7–13, n = 30; POD 14–20, n = 26; and POD 21–33, n = 17. In vitro EC BPF was significantly greater at the POD 7–13 (P < 0.0001) and POD 14–20 (P < 0.0001) time points versus preop results. Significantly greater EC INV and MIG were noted on POD 7–13 and POD 14–20 versus the preop plasma results (P < 0.0001). In regards to POD 21–33, a significantly greater result was noted only for the INV assay versus preop.

Conclusions

Plasma from weeks 2 and 3 after OCR stimulates in vitro EC BPF, INV, and MIG. A significant difference from preop baseline was noted only for the INV assay in week 4. The OCR and previous MICR results were largely similar. Tumor angiogenesis may be stimulated after OCR and MICR for 3 weeks. Further studies are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shantha Kumara HMC, Feingold D, Kalady M, Dujovny N, Senagore A, Hyman N, Cekic V, Whelan RL (2009) Colorectal resection is associated with persistent proangiogenic plasma protein changes: postoperative plasma stimulates in vitro endothelial cell growth, migration, and invasion. Ann Surg 249:973–977. Erratum in: Ann Surg 2009;250(6):1046 Shantha Kumara HMC, Feingold D, Kalady M, Dujovny N, Senagore A, Hyman N, Cekic V, Whelan RL (2009) Colorectal resection is associated with persistent proangiogenic plasma protein changes: postoperative plasma stimulates in vitro endothelial cell growth, migration, and invasion. Ann Surg 249:973–977. Erratum in: Ann Surg 2009;250(6):1046
2.
go back to reference Shantha Kumara HMC, Kirman I, Feingold D, Cekic V, Nasar A, Arnell T, Balik E, Hoffman A, Baxter R, Conte S, Whelan RL (2009) Perioperative GMCSF limits the proangiogenic plasma protein changes associated with colorectal cancer resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:295–301PubMedCrossRef Shantha Kumara HMC, Kirman I, Feingold D, Cekic V, Nasar A, Arnell T, Balik E, Hoffman A, Baxter R, Conte S, Whelan RL (2009) Perioperative GMCSF limits the proangiogenic plasma protein changes associated with colorectal cancer resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:295–301PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shantha Kumara HMC, Cabot JC, Yan X, Herath SA, Luchtefeld M, Kalady MF, Feingold DL, Baxter R, Whelan RL (2011) Minimally invasive colon resection is associated with a persistent increase in plasma PlGF levels following cancer resection. Surg Endosc 25(7):2153–2158PubMedCrossRef Shantha Kumara HMC, Cabot JC, Yan X, Herath SA, Luchtefeld M, Kalady MF, Feingold DL, Baxter R, Whelan RL (2011) Minimally invasive colon resection is associated with a persistent increase in plasma PlGF levels following cancer resection. Surg Endosc 25(7):2153–2158PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–664PubMedCrossRef Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–664PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hazebroek EJ, Color Study Group (2002) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16(6):949–953PubMedCrossRef Hazebroek EJ, Color Study Group (2002) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 16(6):949–953PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hormbrey E, Han C, Roberts A, McGrouther DA, Harris AL (2003) The relationship of human wound vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) after breast cancer surgery to circulating VEGF and angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 9:4332–4339PubMed Hormbrey E, Han C, Roberts A, McGrouther DA, Harris AL (2003) The relationship of human wound vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) after breast cancer surgery to circulating VEGF and angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 9:4332–4339PubMed
8.
go back to reference Nissen NN, Polverini PJ, Koch AE, Volin MV, Gamelli RL, Di Pietro LA (1996) Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates angiogenic activity during the proliferative phase of wound healing. Am J Pathol 148(6):1851–1860PubMed Nissen NN, Polverini PJ, Koch AE, Volin MV, Gamelli RL, Di Pietro LA (1996) Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates angiogenic activity during the proliferative phase of wound healing. Am J Pathol 148(6):1851–1860PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lauer G, Sollberg S, Cole M, Jörg Stürzebecher IF, Mann K, Krieg T, Eming SA (2000) Expression and proteolysis of vascular endothelial growth factor is increased in chronic wounds. J Investig Dermatol 115:12–18PubMedCrossRef Lauer G, Sollberg S, Cole M, Jörg Stürzebecher IF, Mann K, Krieg T, Eming SA (2000) Expression and proteolysis of vascular endothelial growth factor is increased in chronic wounds. J Investig Dermatol 115:12–18PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Werner S, Grose R (2003) Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 83:835–870PubMed Werner S, Grose R (2003) Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 83:835–870PubMed
Metadata
Title
Plasma from the second and third weeks after open colorectal resection for cancer stimulates in vitro endothelial cell growth, migration, and invasion
Authors
H. M. C. Shantha Kumara
Daniel Kirchoff
Samer Naffouje
Michael Grieco
Sonali A. C. Herath
Nadav Dujovny
Matthew F. Kalady
Neil Hyman
Linda Njoh
Richard L. Whelan
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1953-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012 Go to the issue