Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012

01-03-2012

A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Authors: Hiroyuki Daiko, Mitsuyo Nishimura

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TSEP) without thoracotomy is more invasive than right transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). However, TTE and TSEP have not been compared in terms of technical and oncological feasibility for thoracic esophageal carcinomas of the same stage.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with clinical stage I esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection from 2000 through 2010, 30 patients underwent right TTE through 2008, and 29 patients underwent TSEP from 2008 through 2010. TSEP was performed with four ports from 2008 through 2009 (13 patients) and with five ports—four conventional ports and a 5 mm camera port for the upper mediastinum—from 2009 (16 patients). We retrospectively evaluated the technical and oncologic feasibility of TSEP with extended lymph node dissection for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma by comparing surgical outcomes between TTE and TSEP and examined the historical improvements and current status of TSEP, including port placement.

Results

All 29 patients who underwent TSEP with three-field lymph node dissection achieved complete resection, and in the 13 patients followed up for more than 1 year, there were no surgery-related postoperative deaths and no recurrence. No significant difference was found between TTE and TSEP in the mean number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes, amount of blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, mean postoperative hospital stay, or rate of complete resection or locoregional control, but the mean duration of thoracic procedure was significantly longer for TSEP than for TTE. For TSEP, the incidence of complications was lower and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter with five ports than with four ports.

Conclusions

TSEP with extended lymphadenectomy is a feasible and appropriate surgical technique for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma. We believe that its oncological feasibility for advanced esophageal carcinoma also will be demonstrated.
Literature
1.
Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, Rentz JJ, Neumayer LA, Pappas TN, Daley J, Henderson WG, Krasnicka B, Khuri SF (2003) Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 75:217–222 Discussion 222PubMedCrossRef
2.
Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, Federico JA (2007) Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1667–1670PubMedCrossRef
3.
Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973PubMedCrossRef
4.
Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef
5.
Eguchi T, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Iwasaki M, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Umemura S (2006) Histopathological criteria for additional treatment after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal cancer: analysis of 464 surgically resected cases. Mod Pathol 19:475–480PubMedCrossRef
6.
Igaki H, Kato H, Tachimori Y, Daiko H, Fukaya M, Yajima S, Nakanishi Y (2001) Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with clinical stage I squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus treated with three-field lymph node dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20:1089–1094PubMedCrossRef
7.
Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494 Discussion 494–485PubMed
8.
Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr (2000) Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 135:920–925PubMedCrossRef
9.
Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Tech 2:21–25
10.
Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113PubMedCrossRef
11.
Puntambekar SP, Agarwal GA, Joshi SN, Rayate NV, Sathe RM, Patil AM (2010) Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 24:2407–2414PubMedCrossRef
12.
Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491PubMedCrossRef
13.
Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Brachini G, Binda B, Di Paola M, Ponzano C (2007) Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long-term results of a 100-patient series. Am J Surg 194:839–844 Discussion 844PubMedCrossRef
14.
Mochiki E, Ohno T, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in young and elderly patients. World J Surg 29:1585–1591PubMedCrossRef
15.
Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Nishikawa M, Ogata A, Osugi H (2005) Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1177–1181PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma
Authors
Hiroyuki Daiko
Mitsuyo Nishimura
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1934-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A modified two-port thoracoscopic technique versus axillary minithoracotomy for the treatment of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax: a prospective randomized study

OriginalPaper

Transgastric versus laparoendoscopic single-site peritoneoscopy in a rat model: effects on motility, inflammation, and nociception

Editorial

The world is getting smaller

OriginalPaper

Risk factors for pancreatitis following transpapillary self-expandable metal stent placement

Letter to the Editor

Incarcerated hiatal hernia after robot-assisted esophagectomy: transhiatal versus thoracoscopic approach

Dynamic Manuscript

Laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying using a novel device